1 / 23

Multiphoton and Spectral Imaging

Multiphoton and Spectral Imaging. Multiphoton microscopy. Predicted by Maria G öppert-Mayer in 1931 Implemented by Denk in early 1990’s

emlyn
Télécharger la présentation

Multiphoton and Spectral Imaging

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Multiphoton and Spectral Imaging

  2. Multiphoton microscopy • Predicted by Maria Göppert-Mayer in 1931 • Implemented by Denk in early 1990’s • Principle: Instead of raising a molecule to an excited state with a single energetic photon, it cam be raised to an excited state by the quasi-simulatneous absorption of two (2-photon) or 3 (3-photon) less energetic photons

  3. Multiphoton-photon Jablonski diagram

  4. Multiphoton • In multiphoton microscopy, the intermediate state is not a defined state, and so is “quantum forbidden” • However, in quantum mechanics, forbidden is not absolute • Therefore, the requirement for quasi-simultaneity • Practically, it means within ~10-18 seconds • In single photon, probablility of excitation is proportional to I; in two-photon, it is proportional to I2

  5. Excitation volume http://www.loci.wisc.edu/multiphoton/mp.html

  6. Advantages of multiphoton microscopy • Fluorescence excitation is confined to a femtoliter volume – less photobleaching • Excitation wavelengts are not absorbef by fluorophore above plane of focus • Longer excitation wavelengths penetrate more deeply into biological tissue • Inherent optical sectioning

  7. Increased contrast in multiphoton Centonze,V.E and J.G.White. (1998) Biophysical J. 75:2015-2024

  8. Light sources • Light flux necessary for multiphoton microscopy can be achieved by femtosecond pulsed IR lasers • Ti-Sapphire lasers tunable from 700-900 nm • http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/lasers/tsunami/index.html

  9. Spectra Physics Mai Tai, Coherent Chameleon Tuning Ranges 680-1080 nm Sealed box units; no adjustments necessary Computer controlled tuning Stable pointing as you scan spectrum

  10. Dyes for multiphoton microscopy • Multiphoton excitation spectra for dyes is an active field of exploration • Generally, 2PE peaks are broad • General rule: start a little more energetic than λmax for single photon • For example: EGFP: λmax for single photon = 488; λmax for two photon ≈ 900 nm

  11. 2PE Spectra

  12. Detector configuration for multiphoton Molecular Expressions web site Note, in particular the descanned detector and the “Whole Area PMT Detector” = Nondescanned detector.

  13. Descanned detector • Uses same scan mirror to descan beam as was used to scan it. • Better alignment with confocal • However, only collects the amount of light represented by the projection of the mirror onto the specimen: less sensitivity • Do not forget to open up the confocal pinhole, because the nature of multiphoton restricts excitation to a femtoliter volume

  14. Nondescanned detector • Because our excitation volume is restricted to a femtoliter volume, and is automatically an optical section, we do not need to descan • Cone projected onto specimen is much wider, so much more sensitivity • However, also much more sensitive to stray light

  15. Confocal spectral imaging • In many case, the spectra of dyes overlap either in their excitation spectrum, their emission spectrum, or both. • What can we do? • Excitation overlap – for instance, tetramethylrhodamine excitation spectrum overlaps that of fluorescein, so if we use the 488 and 543 lines simulatanously, we see overlap • Solution: • Choose different dyey (fluorescein and Texas red) • Multitracking (sequential scanning) – excite at 488 while the fluorescein image is being collected and at 543 while the rhodamine is.

  16. What about emission? Choose different dyes Molecular Probes

  17. Sometimes you can’t avoid overlap • Autofluorescence frequently overlaps fluorescein emission • NADH/Flavoprotein: on 2-P excitation at 800 nm, the 450 nm NADH emission is clean, but the 550 nm flavoprotein emission band has about 30% NADH emission • Fluorescent proteins

  18. Example: Lambda stack of cells expressing either CFP or GFP on chromatin

  19. What do we do? • Acquire a Lambda stack of our image • Acquire a lambda stack of our reference dyes, or, alternatively, identify areas in the image that will be pure. • Mathematicall, through linear unmixing, apply linear algebra to separate the individual dye spectra from the multispectral image

  20. Linear Unmixing • Different amounts of pink and blue generate different spectra

  21. Pairwise comparison of dyes that can or cannot be unmixed Note that for pairs that cannot be unmixed (ie, DiO and eGFP), the shape of the spectra are very similar

  22. Unmixing: fluorescein phalloidin and Sytox green

  23. Problems with linear unmixing • It takes a lot longer to acquire lambda stacks than single images • The software – at least on the Leica – is not transparent to use Solutions Zeiss META Both use a prism to separate Nikon CSI the spectrum to multiple channels Both have software that is easier to use

More Related