1 / 26

Robotics

Robotics. CMSC 25000 Artificial Intelligence March 11, 2008. Roadmap. Robotics is AI-complete Integration of many AI techniques Classic AI Search in configuration space (Ultra) Modern AI Subsumption architecture Multi-level control Conclusion. Mobile Robots. Robotics is AI-complete.

Télécharger la présentation

Robotics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Robotics CMSC 25000 Artificial Intelligence March 11, 2008

  2. Roadmap • Robotics is AI-complete • Integration of many AI techniques • Classic AI • Search in configuration space • (Ultra) Modern AI • Subsumption architecture • Multi-level control • Conclusion

  3. Mobile Robots

  4. Robotics is AI-complete • Robotics integrates many AI tasks • Perception • Vision, sound, haptics • Reasoning • Search, route planning, action planning • Learning • Recognition of objects/locations • Exploration

  5. Sensors and Effectors • Robotics interact with real world • Need direct sensing for • Distance to objects – range finding/sonar/GPS • Recognize objects – vision • Self-sensing – proprioception: pose/position • Need effectors to • Move self in world: locomotion: wheels, legs • Move other things in world: manipulators • Joints, arms: Complex many degrees of freedom

  6. Real World Complexity • Real world is hardest environment • Partially observable, multiagent, stochastic • Problems: • Localization and mapping • Where things are • What routes are possible • Where robot is • Sensors may be noisy; Effectors are imperfect • Don’t necessarily go where intend • Solved in probabilistic framework

  7. Navigation

  8. Application: Configuration Space • Problem: Robot navigation • Move robot between two objects without changing orientation • Possible? • Complex search space: boundary tests, etc

  9. Configuration Space • Basic problem: infinite states! Convert to finite state space. • Cell decomposition: • divide up space into simple cells, each of which can be traversed “easily" (e.g., convex) • Skeletonization: • Identify finite number of easily connected points/lines that form a graph such that any two points are connected by a path on the graph

  10. Skeletonization Example • First step: Problem transformation • Model robot as point • Model obstacles by combining their perimeter + path of robot around it • “Configuration Space”: simpler search

  11. Navigation

  12. Navigation

  13. Navigation as Simple Search • Replace funny robot shape in field of funny shaped obstacles with • Point robot in field of configuration shapes • All movement is: • Start to vertex, vertex to vertex, or vertex to goal • Search: Start, vertices, goal, & connections • A* search yields efficient least cost path

  14. Online Search • Offline search: • Think a lot, then act once • Online search: • Think a little, act, look, think,.. • Necessary for exploration, (semi)dynamic env • Components: Actions, step-cost, goal test • Compare cost to optimal if env known • Competitive ratio (possibly infinite)

  15. Online Search Agents • Exploration: • Perform action in state -> record result • Search locally • Why? DFS? BFS? • Backtracking requires reversibility • Strategy: Hill-climb • Use memory: if stuck, try apparent best neighbor • Unexplored state: assume closest • Encourages exploration

  16. Acting without Modeling • Goal: Move through terrain • Problem I: Don’t know what terrain is like • No model! • E.g. rover on Mars • Problem II: Motion planning is complex • Too hard to model • Solution: Reactive control

  17. Reactive Control Example • Hexapod robot in rough terrain • Sensors inadequate for full path planning • 2 DOF*6 legs: kinematics, plan intractable

  18. Model-free Direct Control • No environmental model • Control law: • Each leg cycles: on ground; in air • Coordinate so that 3 legs on ground (opposing) • Retain balance • Simple, works on flat terrain

  19. Handling Rugged Terrain • Problem: Obstacles • Block leg’s forward motion • Solution: Add control rule • If blocked, lift higher and repeat • Implementable as FSM • Reflex agent with state

  20. FSM Reflex Controller Retract, lift higher yes no S3 Stuck? S4 Move Forward Set Down Lift up S2 S1 Push back

  21. Emergent Behavior • Reactive controller walks robustly • Model-free; no search/planning • Depends on feedback from the environment • Behavior emerges from interaction • Simple software + complex environment • Controller can be learned • Reinforcement learning

  22. Subsumption Architecture • Assembles reactive controllers from FSMs • Test and condition on sensor variables • Arcs tagged with messages; sent when traversed • Messages go to effectors or other FSMs • Clocks control time to traverse arc- AFSM • E.g. previous example • Reacts to contingencies between robot and env • Synchronize, merge outputs from AFSMs

  23. Subsumption Architecture • Composing controllers from composition of AFSM • Bottom up design • Single to multiple legs, to obstacle avoidance • Avoids complexity and brittleness • No need to model drift, sensor error, effector error • No need to model full motion

  24. Subsumption Problems • Relies on raw sensor data • Sensitive to failure, limited integration • Typically restricted to local tasks • Hard to change task • Emergent behavior – not specified plan • Hard to understand • Interactions of multiple AFSMs complex

  25. Solution • Hybrid approach • Integrates classic and modern AI • 3 layer architecture • Base reactive layer: low-level control • Fast sensor action loop • Executive (glue) layer • Sequence actions for reactive layer • Deliberate layer • Generates global solutions to complex tasks with planning • Model based: pre-coded and/or learned • Slower • Some variant appears in most modern robots

  26. Conclusion • Robotics as AI microcosm • Back to PEAS model • Performance measure, environment, actuators, sensors • Robots as agents act in full complex real world • Tasks, rely on actuators and sensing of environment • Exploits perceptions, learning, and reasoning • Integrates classic AI search, representation with modern learning, robustness, real-world focus

More Related