1 / 25

Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What ’ s New in North Carolina?

Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What ’ s New in North Carolina?. Objectives. Become familiar with the current work of NCDPI regarding Responsiveness to Instruction ( RtI ) Know the key differences between the four and three tier RtI model

emmanuel-parsons
Télécharger la présentation

Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What ’ s New in North Carolina?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What’s New in North Carolina?

  2. Objectives • Become familiar with the current work of NCDPI regarding Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) • Know the key differences between the four and three tier RtI model • Understand the critical components of RtI as a framework for school improvement

  3. History of RtI in NC

  4. North Carolina Problem-Solving Model • 2000 Study began • 2004 Five pilot sites • 2006 State wide training • 2008 Regional training & trainers • 2010 General education partnership • 2011 Implementation Science • 2012 Transition to RtI three tier model

  5. NC DPI Definition of RtI NC Responsiveness to Instruction (NCRtI) is a multi-tiered framework which promotes school improvement through engaging, high quality instruction. NCRtI employs a team approach to guide educational practices, using a problem-solving model based on data, to address student needs and maximize growth for all.

  6. Critical Components of RtI • Leadership and Shared Responsibility • Curriculum and Instruction • Assessment • Problem-Solving/Data-Based Decision Making • Family and Community Partnerships • Sustainability and Integration

  7. Transitioning from Four to Three Tier Model

  8. Adjusting Mindsets Process for some students Framework for total school improvement

  9. Why Shift? • Place focus on problem-solving core for total school improvement • Increase focus on general education • Movement away from viewing RtI as a process to a framework for all students • Integrate with Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS)

  10. Special Education Educating in silos AIG ESL Title I Slide created by Dale Cusumano, Ph.D.

  11. Educating Collaboratively Special Education AIG ESL Title I Slide adapted from Dale Cusumano, Ph.D.

  12. Defining, Analyzing and Monitoring Tiers I, II and III

  13. Layering of Support Intensive Support Supplemental Support Differentiated Core

  14. Foundational Core: Tier I Who: All students are in Tier I (Core) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to produce good outcomes for the majority of students Effectiveness: If at least 80% of all students in all subgroups are meeting benchmarks in Core (with no additional support)

  15. Tier I – Three TierFocus on Core • Includes all students • Focus on all students across a grade and response to core • Document on one grade level problem-solving form • Monitor response (of all students) to instructional changes

  16. Tier I – Focus on Core • Enhanced core • Increased academic engaged time • Less paperwork • Less progress monitoring

  17. Analyzing Core

  18. Analyzing Core • Are at least 80% of your students proficient in each subgroup with foundational core alone? • What is working? Why? How do you know? • What’s not working? Why? How do you know? • Do teachers have needed skills & content knowledge?

  19. Supplemental Instruction: Tier II Who: Students needing supplemental support in addition to Core instruction (approx. 20% of students) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to improving performance in Core Effectiveness: If at least 70-80% of students improve performance (towards Core standards) Slide adapted from G. Batsche

  20. Tier II – Supplemental + Core • Instruction is connected to core content • Supplemental instruction does not supplant core • Documentation is on same form for individual student • Analysis of effectiveness of Tier II instruction for all students (towards Core Standards)

  21. Intensive Instruction: Tier III Who: Students needing intensive support in addition to supplemental and Core instruction (approx. 5% of students) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to improving performance Effectiveness: If there is progress towards performance (in Core standards) Slide adapted from G. Batsche

  22. Tier III – Intensive + Supplemental + Core • Instruction is most intensive in the building • Increase intensity and frequency (time, duration, or digging deeper in specific skill) • Documentation is on same form for individual student • Analysis of effectiveness of Tier III instruction for all students (towards Core Standards)

  23. NCDPI Responsiveness to Instruction http://www.ncpublicschools.org/curriculum/responsiveness/

  24. Contact Information • Amy Jablonskiamy.jablonski@dpi.nc.gov

  25. Questions

More Related