1 / 57

JL-001

Québec/Ontario A Fresh Look (or: Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear) présentation by Jean-François Lisée CERIUM.ca at the Chair of Quebec studies, Glendon College, February 2005. JL-001. Question # 1 Is Québec closing the gap ?. JL-002. A decade of growth. JL-004.

emmy
Télécharger la présentation

JL-001

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Québec/OntarioA Fresh Look(or: Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear)présentation by Jean-François LiséeCERIUM.caat the Chair of Quebec studies, Glendon College, February 2005 JL-001

  2. Question # 1 Is Québec closing the gap ? JL-002

  3. A decade of growth JL-004

  4. A decade of growth JL-004

  5. Déchiffrer le modèle québécois • A significant leap: In the OECD, only Ireland did better • In North-America Québec is historically poorerBut is closing the gap JL-002

  6. A full cycle Québec/Ontario Growth (1989-2000) Prosperity in principle or per person? JL-003

  7. Is the trend holding ?Québec/Ontario (2000-2003) JL-003

  8. Will the trend hold ?Québec/Ontario (2004-2005) (ConfB. estimates) JL-003

  9. Closing the wealth gap Québec/Canada 1992-2002 JL-004

  10. Closing the wealth gap Québec/Ontario 1960-2004 JL-004

  11. Closing the wealth gap Québec/United States 1992-2004 This is an average JL-004

  12. Trying not to keep up with these Johneses.. JL-005

  13. Revenue concentration at the top US 1% - 1973-2003 So, one has to beware of averages JL-004

  14. At the low end of the ladder • Family poverty rate, 1997 18% USA 12% European Union 10% Canada 9% Québec 1997, PPA JL-005

  15. Middle class Median disposable work income, 1997 Per cap, PPP, $US de 1995 Canada 20 300 $ Québec 20 500 $ Ontario 21 600 $ USA 21 700 $ Source: Pierre Fortin, UQAM JL-005

  16. Cost of living, after taxes, Toronto/Montréal JL-005

  17. Cost of living, after taxes, Toronto/Montréal JL-005

  18. Cost of living, after taxes, Toronto/Montréal JL-005

  19. Cost of living, after taxes, Toronto/Montréal JL-005

  20. Cost of living, after taxes, Toronto/Montréal JL-005

  21. Cost of living, after taxes, Toronto/Montréal JL-005

  22. To sum up… • Québec’s wealth is growing rapidly. • The 25% of Quebeckers at the bottom of the revenue scale have a higher standard of living than their counterparts in Canada and the US. • The standard of living of the Quebec middle class is close to that of Ontario and the US (-5%) and higher than that of Canada. • The very rich are richer in Ontario and much, much richer in the US. JL-005

  23. Question # 2 Are immigrants afraid of Québec ? JL-002

  24. Attracting int’l immigrants: Québec / Ontario JL-004

  25. Attracting int’l immigrants: Québec / Ontario JL-004

  26. Total migratory balance: Québec / North-East JL-004

  27. Attracting int’l immigrants: Québec Canada USA JL-004

  28. Total migratory balance : Québec Canada USA JL-004

  29. Déchiffrer le modèle québécois • So… A significant ability to attract international immigrants. A steadily growing retention rate (now 83% vs 86% in ROC) or these immigrants Against a negative (but improving) interprovincial anglophone migratory balance On an anglophone continent, not a bad performance. JL-002

  30. Question # 3 The bureaucrat- heavy-province ? JL-002

  31. « The bureaucratic empire » Québec/Ontario JL-005

  32. « The bureaucratic empire » Québec/Ontario JL-005

  33. « The bureaucratic empire » Québec/Ontario JL-005

  34. « The bureaucratic empire » Québec/Ontario JL-005

  35. « The bureaucratic empire » Québec/Ontario JL-005

  36. Question # 4 Québec’s fiscal hell JL-002

  37. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario 1 400 JL-005

  38. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario Québec expenses and services not offered by Ontario, 2001-2002 (partial list) Sum (in millions) Use of the supplementary fiscal revenues (balance) Supplementary fiscal revenues 2 800 JL-005

  39. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario Québec expenses and services not offered by Ontario, 2001-2002 (partial list) Sum (in millions) Use of the supplementary fiscal revenues (balance) Supplementary fiscal revenues 2 800 5$ (now 7$) a day daycare 1 020 1 780 JL-005

  40. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario Québec expenses and services not offered by Ontario, 2001-2002 (partial list) Sum (in millions) Use of the supplementary fiscal revenues (balance) Supplementary fiscal revenues 2 800 5$ (now 7$) a day daycare 1 020 1 780 Supplementary child benefit 565 1 215 JL-005

  41. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario Québec expenses and services not offered by Ontario, 2001-2002 (partial list) Sum (in millions) Use of the supplementary fiscal revenues (balance) Supplementary fiscal revenues 2 800 5$ (now 7$) a day daycare 1 020 1 780 Supplementary child benefit 565 1 215 Pharmacare 1 686 -471 JL-005

  42. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario Québec expenses and services not offered by Ontario, 2001-2002 (partial list) Sum (in millions) Use of the supplementary fiscal revenues (balance) Supplementary fiscal revenues 2 800 5$ (now 7$) a day daycare 1 020 1 780 Supplementary child benefit 565 1 215 Pharmacare 1 686 -471 Student grants 177 -648 JL-005

  43. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario Québec expenses and services not offered by Ontario, 2001-2002 (partial list) Sum (in millions) Use of the supplementary fiscal revenues (balance) Supplementary fiscal revenues 2 800 5$ (now 7$) a day daycare 1 020 1 780 Supplementary child benefit 565 1 215 Pharmacare 1 686 -471 Student grants 177 -648 Private schools grants 307 -955 JL-005

  44. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario Québec expenses and services not offered by Ontario, 2001-2002 (partial list) Sum (in millions) Use of the supplementary fiscal revenues (balance) Supplementary fiscal revenues 2 800 5$ (now 7$) a day daycare 1 020 1 780 Supplementary child benefit 565 1 215 Pharmacare 1 686 -471 Student grants 177 -648 Private schools grants 307 -955 Local developement budgets 219 -1 174 JL-005

  45. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario Québec expenses and services not offered by Ontario, 2001-2002 (partial list) Sum (in millions) Use of the supplementary fiscal revenues (balance) Supplementary fiscal revenues 2 800 5$ (now 7$) a day daycare 1 020 1 780 Supplementary child benefit 565 1 215 Pharmacare 1 686 -471 Student grants 177 -648 Private schools grants 307 -955 Local developement budgets 219 -1 174 Culture (supplementary effort) 155 -1 329 JL-005

  46. « The fiscal hell » Québec vs Ontario Québec expenses and services not offered by Ontario, 2001-2002 (partial list) Sum (in millions) Use of the supplementary fiscal revenues (balance) Supplementary fiscal revenues 2 800 5$ (now 7$) a day daycare 1 020 1 780 Supplementary child benefit 565 1 215 Pharmacare 1 686 -471 Student grants 177 -648 Private schools grants 307 -955 Local developement budgets 219 -1 174 Culture (supplementary effort) 155 -1 329 Total 4 129 JL-005

  47. To sum up… For every tax dollar, Quebeckers have more services than Ontarians. Furthermore, Torontonians pay their electricity at rates 64% higher than Quebeckers. JL-002

  48. Tax Freedom day : The Fraser Institute Test

  49. Tax Freedom day : The Fraser Institute Test

  50. Tax Freedom day : The Fraser Institute Test

More Related