1 / 25

The CASPAR view on: What digital curators do and what they need to know : Research Perspectives

The CASPAR view on: What digital curators do and what they need to know : Research Perspectives. David Giaretta CASPAR Project Director. What digital curators do:. Struggle with: Funders Reluctant to provide long-term commitments Information providers Unwilling to provide what is needed

erich-oliver
Télécharger la présentation

The CASPAR view on: What digital curators do and what they need to know : Research Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The CASPAR view on:What digital curators do and what they need to know :Research Perspectives David Giaretta CASPAR Project Director

  2. What digital curators do: • Struggle with: • Funders • Reluctant to provide long-term commitments • Information providers • Unwilling to provide what is needed • Users • demanding ever more sophistication Cost control, Cost estimates Ways to capture required info Ways to ensure info is understandable

  3. The CASPAR Consortium http://www.casparpreserves.eu

  4. What do digital curators need to know

  5. Curation: do preservation and publication/access - but do not confuse them Transient tools and technologies with changing demands and implementations • Needs of access: • Responsive • Sophisticated search techniques • Users often familiar with the material • Needs of Preservation: • Ensure the information trapped in the bits is authentic and understandable • To the Designated Community Not transient Curation also implies making fit for purpose – adding to info

  6. There are disincentives for preservation: COST Budget available Money If cost of preserving old information increases… Time Need to show that costs are contained

  7. Preservation can be sold as benefiting Publication/Access : Use of Unfamiliar Data • Global Cyber-Infrastructures allow users to find and try to use data from many sources • Some sources will be familiar • Most available sources will be unfamiliar • How can one be sure that the unfamiliar data is used correctly • Need understanding • Garbage in – garbage out • Need to be able to deal with unfamiliar data whether it is contemporary or old (preserved)

  8. Digital Preservation… • Easy to do… • …as long as you can provide money forever • Easy to test claims about tools… • …as long as you live a long time

  9. Know what is being preserved: the great Data / Document divide • Need to preserve information & knowledge – not just “the bits” • Documents, videos are rendered – simple? • Data – must be processed – in new ways - harder Publication of data as well as documents What is the cost of publication and preservation?

  10. Information is the important thing Information: Any type of knowledge that can be exchanged. In an exchange, it is represented by data. • What information? • Documents…… • Data……. • Original bits? • Look and feel? • Behaviour? • Performance? • Explicit/ Implicit/ Tacit Long Term is long enough to be concerned with the impacts of changing technologies, including support for new media and data formats, or with a changing user community. Long Term may extend indefinitely. Ensure that the information to be preserved is Independently Understandable to (and usable by) the Designated Community.

  11. Things change/disappear How can we ensure that the information trapped in the “bits” remains understandable despite all these changes? • Software • Hardware • Environment • E.g. Network links to related information • People • What is “common knowledge” How can a digital curator even be aware of these changes?

  12. Your time is short… • Neither you nor your institution (or preservation project) will last forever • The chain of preservation is only as strong its weakest link • Need to be prepared to hand over How can whole collections be handed over? How can the information in the archive managers’ heads be handed over?

  13. No repository is an island • You/your organisation/project cannot do everything • Things change • You will not be around forever • Must somehow tap into other resources How can we find these resources? How can we share the resources? Where do the resources come from?

  14. Wisdom of the world • “given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow” • However it may be a statistical process Is there one right description of something? How can we decide between alternatives?

  15. We cannot foretell the future • Need to manage knowledge to keep archives alive through time • Preservation is a process, not a one-time event • Preservation is expensive – costs need to be shared • Open Archival Information Systems Reference Model (ISO 14721) provides a general conceptual framework (http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf) • At least monitor the Designated Community How can this be done over time?

  16. Information Object 1+ interpreted interpreted using Data Representation 1+ using Object Information Physical Digital Object Object 1+ Bit Sequence OAIS – not just the Functional Model diagram The Information Model is key Recursion ends at KNOWLEDGEBASE of the DESIGNATED COMMUNITY (this knowledge will change over time and region)

  17. Representation Information • The Data Object is “interpreted using” the Representation Information (RepInfo) • The Reference Model is designed to ensure that an OAIS is not set the impossible task of having to provide all possible RepInfo immediately • Hence: • Take account of the Designated Community and its associated Knowledge Base • The amount of RepInfo is not fixed • Additional RepInfo will be needed over time How do we define a Designated Community? How? By whom?

  18. Rep • Info CASPAR information flow architecture Virtualisation How do we capture the Representation Information?

  19. Authenticity • Evidence • Evidence • Evidence

  20. Support infrastructure • Registries of Representation Information • Representation Information Gap Manager • Orchestration Manager • Toolkits • Representation Information • Preservation Description Information

  21. Some shared infrastructure

  22. CASPAR aims • Produce tools and techniques to support digital preservation and make it easier to share the cost • must be relatively easy to use • must have a low “buy-in” in terms of effort required for adoption • must avoid requiring wholesale change of everyone else’s systems • must be decentralised and reproducible so that it can live on after the formal end of the CASPAR project • must be “preservable” • must be open: open source, open standards • Cannot do everything • Working closely with the UK Digital Curation Centre

  23. Can you tell who is selling preservation snake oil? • Write out everything as XML? • Write things onto holographic storage? • Etch text onto titanium sheets? • Just migrate to the newest format? • CASPAR? • …. How to decide?

  24. Validation • Demonstrate theoretical basis • “Accelerated lifetime” tests • Changes in hardware • Changes in environment • Changes in Designated Community • Demonstrate increased trustworthiness • Measured using Certification process (as/when available)

  25. Links • CASPAR: http://www.casparpreserves.eu • DCC: http://www.dcc.ac.uk • OAIS (ISO 14721) http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf • Audit and Certification ISO standard development: http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org

More Related