1 / 24

Redefining Tetraplegia

Michael Keith MD Ann Bryden OTRL Cleveland Ohio USA. Redefining Tetraplegia. SCI Classification. An important component in determining potential interventions is the classification of the level of injury

etana
Télécharger la présentation

Redefining Tetraplegia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Michael Keith MD Ann Bryden OTRL Cleveland Ohio USA Redefining Tetraplegia

  2. SCI Classification • An important component in determining potential interventions is the classification of the level of injury • Classification schemes provide a common platform for understanding the degree of function associated with the level of SCI

  3. SCI Classification • International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) • American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) • International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) • Most commonly used • International Classification for Surgery of the Hand in Tetraplegia (ICSHT) • For cervical level SCI only • Both classifications include a motor and sensory portion • The ICSHT is focused on the upper extremity

  4. Who are the Stakeholders, and Why? • An increasing number of stakeholders • International Tetraplegia Group – Therapists and Surgeons • International Campaign for Cures of Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis (ICCP) • American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) / International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) – UE Basic Data Set • Why? • Detect changes from natural recovery • Better define incomplete lesions • Measure the impact of interventions • Aimed at cure • Activity based therapy • Surgical reconstruction

  5. NEW Version 2/2013

  6. ASIA Update – Non Key Muscles

  7. Congruence with ICSHT?

  8. Current ClassificationsA classification should tell you what to do. • ASIA, ISCOS, AIS, ISNCSCI • Work well with complete lesions, complicated - perhaps without predictive use for surgical treatment. Does not classify results or permit patient reported outcomes.

  9. Current ClassificationsA classification should tell you what to do. • International Surgical Classification • Work well with complete motor paralysis, voluntary (C5,C6), Group 0,1,2,3, 1/3 of cases. • Many Patient choices, surgical variations in C7,C8 • Does not report anatomic change or PRO. Can be used for equivalency of function.

  10. Functional Enhancement for Cervical SCI - 1990 . Electrical Stimulation Tendon Transfers Shoulder abduction C4 Elbow flexion O:0 Wrist extension C5 O:1 FES Br->ECRB OCu:2 PD->Triceps OCu:3 Elbow extension C6 Finger, thumb extension OCu:4 OCu:5 Br->FPL ECRL->FDP Finger, thumb flexion OCu:6 C7 PT->FPL Br->EDC Thumb abduction OCu:7 OCu:8 C8 OCu:9

  11. ICSHT (arms) Where do the Classifications Fail? Specific Examples • Group 0 – 4 • Group 1 – 3 • Group 2 – 5 • Group 5 – 3 • NC - 3 Subject Characteristics(n=9, 18 Arms*) ASIA (arms) C4 – 2 C5 – 5 C6 – 6 C7 – 3 NC - 2

  12. Where do the Classifications Fail? • Incomplete Injuries • Spasticity • Characterizing Paralysis • Examples • 77VC R: C5, -C6, C7, C8 / 5, -6, -7, 8 • 99VC R: C6 / 0, -1, 2, -3, 4, 5, 6, -7 • 99 VC L: C6, -C7, C8 / 2, -3, -4, 5, 6, -7, 8

  13. “IC Exceptions” • Partial Tetraplegia • Asymmetrical lesions • Recovered- • Regenerated, Repaired • Hyper-reflexive • Contracted • Bi-manual activities

  14. Clinical Decision Support • Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guidelines • Appropriate Use Criteria • Cumulative experience without evidence • Informed Opinion

  15. Clinical Practice Guidelines • Evidence based if outcome based. • Solve problems of clinical decision making. • Make Recommendations based on strong evidence. • Find directions for outcomes research. • Form the basis for national Performance Measures and Appropriate Use Criteria. • Search: www.guidelines.gov

  16. Appropriate Use CriteriaRAND Methodology • Writing Group • Classification • Risk Adjustment • Important Clinical Criteria • Alternative Treatments

  17. Appropriate Use Criteria • Review Group • Refine credibility of application by experts • Voting Group • Shareholders Rate for Appropriate, Maybe Appropriate, Rarely Appropriate

  18. Examples of AUC- AAOS App. • www.aaos.org/auc

  19. Examples of AUC- AAOS App. • http://aaos.webauthor.com/go/auc

  20. AAOS AUC App, Distal Radius Fx

  21. Potential AUC writing table

  22. Measuring Spasticity • Challenges in measuring spasticity • Ashworth • Tardieu • Other • Distinguishing between measures of spasticity and spasms • Penn spasm scale, others>

  23. Lets write a AUC about Surgical Decision Making in Tetraplegia. • Review the literature for outcomes summary. CPG unlikely. • Writing group • Review Group • Voting Group

More Related