1 / 10

Jigsaw #4: Reproductive Politics

Jigsaw #4: Reproductive Politics. t his week:. Bentley, “Feeding Baby Teaching Mother: Gerber and the Evolution of Infant Food and Feeding Practices in the U.S .”

etenia
Télécharger la présentation

Jigsaw #4: Reproductive Politics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jigsaw #4:Reproductive Politics

  2. this week: • Bentley, “Feeding Baby Teaching Mother: Gerber and the Evolution of Infant Food and Feeding Practices in the U.S.” • Mamo and Fishman, “Potency in All the Right Places: Viagra as a Technological Gendered Body” + Angier, “The Search for the Female Equivalent of Viagra” • Squier, “Negotiating Boundaries: From Assisted Reproduction to Assisted Replication” • Wilding, “Vulvas with a Difference” • Shiebinger, “Feminist History of Colonial Science”

  3. Reflection #9: • How do some social critics connect these images…. • …and how does Petchesky both contest as well as embrace such reasoning?

  4. Rosalind Pollack Petchesky: “Fetal Images: The Power of Visual Culture in the Politics of Reproduction”

  5. Pro-life: set the terms of debate via powerful imagery (264):“a picture of a dead fetus is worth a thousand words” (263)

  6. Visual Reductionism

  7. Ultrasounds & Privileging Vision • “panoptics of the womb” (277) • Impulse to “see inside” has come to dominate ways of knowing about pregnancy and fetuses (275) • Fetishization: severing function; detaches fetus from mother (277) • Vision: connects us to “truth” but distances us from the corporeal

  8. technoscientific management of pregnancy: • Do technologies like • Amniocentesis • In vitro fertilization • Electronic fetal monitoring • Cesarean sections • Ultrasounds • carve away women’s management of their pregnancies? (271) • put women in adversarial positions to their own fetuses? (271) • propel OBGYNs into profit and relevance? (272)

  9. Reductionism, revisited: • Certain feminist critiques of so-called “war against the womb” are themselves reductionist (278) • Every woman’s experience of visualization technologies conflated as victimization • Women’s experience will be contextual • Feminist reductionism ignores: • Some women’s enjoyment • feeling may be no more natural than seeing • Women’s resistance to medical control; women’s agency • Women’s complicity in visualization technologies • Some women’s willing participation in “the war against the womb” • Those women who desire reproductive technology to assist in fertility • Due to socio-economic marginalization, some women are never given the opportunity to utilize these technologies in the first place

  10. If we’re thinking like feminist scientists… • Objectivity must be reevaluated for feminists as well:“objectification identified as masculinist will take different forms: some detach viewer from viewed; some make possible that attachment” (283). • “A true biological perspective does not lead us to determinism but rather to infinite variation, which is to say that it is historical” (284) • “Feminists have no common standpoint about how women ought to use this power” (286).

More Related