1 / 17

Pre-Season Nitrogen-Rich Strips and Response Index as a New Strategy for Fertilizer Management.

Pre-Season Nitrogen-Rich Strips and Response Index as a New Strategy for Fertilizer Management. G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK. The Problem: Poor NUE. Worldwide NUE in cereals  33% 1 % improvement  490,000 Mg/yr

evansjohn
Télécharger la présentation

Pre-Season Nitrogen-Rich Strips and Response Index as a New Strategy for Fertilizer Management.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pre-Season Nitrogen-Rich Strips and Response Index as a New Strategy for Fertilizer Management. G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK

  2. The Problem: Poor NUE • Worldwide NUE in cereals  33% • 1 % improvement  490,000 Mg/yr • 1 % improvement  $235,000,000/yr. • Higher NUE = lower field N losses

  3. Poor NUE

  4. Poor NUE

  5. Poor NUE • Result of mineral N present at concentrations in excess of plant needs.

  6. Temporal variability • Uncertain yield potential

  7. Temporal variability • Uncertain use (availability) of non-fertilizer N

  8. What is wrong with current N management?

  9. Problems with conventional N management • Assumes temporal variability is negligible. • Yield potential is the same each year. • Supply of non-fertilizer N to crop is constant and negligible. • N application rate for field is the same each year. • Assumes preplant fertilizer-N will be efficiently used.

  10. New Strategy • Apply little or no N fertilizer to field preplant, except for N-Rich Strip. • N-Rich Strip = N rate to meet seasonal needs of crop.

  11. 90 N Preplant 45 N Preplant New Strategy • Estimate potential N response in-season. RINDVI = 1.46

  12. New Strategy • Estimate potential N response in-season.

  13. YPMAX YPN YP0 New Strategy • Provide in-season estimate of yield (INSEY)

  14. Economic estimates Average Gain = $10.73/acre/yr

  15. Economic estimates Average Gain = $17.13/acre/yr

  16. Topdress N Return ($/Ac) Obs. Treatment Preplant N Early Late Total N Yld (bu/a) 81 VRT 41 15 23 79 39.8 100 17 Farmer Check 52 21 20 92 34.6 82 2002 Field trials • 10 trials using 60-ft boom sensor-applicator. • Web site. • http://www.dasnr.okstate.edu/nitrogen_use/

  17. Conclusions • Temporal variability can be managed. • Create N-Rich Strip in each field. • Evaluate yield potential and N responsiveness in-season using sensor. • New management strategy improves NUE and profitability for farmers. • New management strategy reduces field loss of fertilizer.

More Related