1 / 30

NACSO and the National CBNRM Programme

NACSO and the National CBNRM Programme. Background. Prior to 1996, rural communities on communal land in Namibia had no rights over wildlife: All wildlife was State property and was generally poorly managed Local communities often suffered extensive losses as a result of wildlife

everett
Télécharger la présentation

NACSO and the National CBNRM Programme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NACSO and the National CBNRM Programme

  2. Background Prior to 1996, rural communities on communal land in Namibia had no rights over wildlife: • All wildlife was State property and was generally poorly managed • Local communities often suffered extensive losses as a result of wildlife • Hunting and poaching was rife and wildlife populations were declining • In contrast, commercial farmers have been entitled to utilise wildlife on their land and, thereby, benefit from it since 1975. In 1996, the Government of the Republic of Namibia introduced legislation to grant legal rights to rural communities over the management and utilisation of their natural resources, giving communal area residents the same rights over wildlife and tourism as freehold farmers This resulted in the development, in the mid-1980s, of the Community Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) Programme

  3. CBNRM in Namibia The CBNRM Programme is a joint venture between government, non-governmental institutions, communities, community-based organisations and development partners which aims to: • promote wise and sustainable use of natural resources and encourage biodiversity conservation • devolve rights over and responsibilities for wildlife and tourism to rural communities, creating enterprise and income generation opportunities • encourage and assist communities to acquire skills to manage their area sustainably and actively pilot their own future These objectives are achieved through the formation of Conservancies… “Conservancies empower local people to make their own decisions about their own resources, while enabling them to benefit from these resources. Conservancies should be seen as creating an institutional infrastructure in helping to diversify rural economies. Through the conservancy system, my government has created an environment and an opportunity for natural resource based industries to develop” Dr Sam Nujoma, President of the Republic of Namibia

  4. Rights of conservancies A registered conservancy, on behalf of the community it represents, acquires new rights and responsibilities with regard to the consumptive and non-consumptive use and management of wildlife: Consumptive uses include: use of game for trophy hunting, consumption, commercial sale for meat or capture for live sale Non-consumptive uses include: tourism ventures such as community-based tourism enterprises and joint venture agreements with private sector entrepreneurs

  5. Legal requirements for the formation of communal area conservancies • Defined membership and registered members; • Defined area with agreed boundaries; • Legal constitution, providing for game management and utilisation plan & Equitable benefits distribution plan – constitution outlines conservancy purpose and objectives, define membership, management structure, elections, decision-making etc.; • Representative management committee – either elect new or adopt and adapt existing one;

  6. Historical Background (NACSO) • IRDNC activities since late 1980s • LIFE Programme support since 1993 • MET legislation passed in 1996 (increased interest, demand and stakeholders) • Need for national coordination mechanism discussed since 1997 • Formation of CAN/NACSO (1999/2000)

  7. Aim The aim of NACSO is to promote, support and further the development of community-based approaches to the wise and sustainable management of natural resources, thereby striving to advance rural development and livelihoods, to promote biodiversity conservation and to empower communities through capacity building and good governance, to determine their own long-term destinies.

  8. NNDF – MET (NNF, RF, Nacobta, LAC, UNAM, MBEC, HU, MWARD) ……… – MET (NNF, RF, Nacobta, LAC, UNAM) NDT – MET (NNF, RF, Nacobta, LAC, UNAM, Sardep, MAWRD) IRDNC – MET (NNF, RF, Nacobta, LAC, UNAM) RF – MET (NNF, Nacobta, LAC, UNAM, RCs, Sardep) RISE – MET (NNF, RF, Nacobta, LAC, UNAM) IRDNC – MET (NNF, RF, Nacobta, LAC, UNAM) Current Members

  9. Annual General Meeting NACSO Grant Approval Board Management Committee Quarterly Members’ Meetings Legal W/G LAC Institutional Dev. W/G IRDNC Training W/G RF Strategic W/G NNF Secretariate Grants Mgt. & M&E NNF NRM W/G DEA BED W/G Nacobta Research & Evaluation Unam Field based implementation is coordinated by a partnership between Local MET offices and Regional based NGO’s. Refer to map of NACSO partners to show the institutional arrangements in each geographical area Structure

  10. Conservancy Support Activities • Development of Conservancy Management and Monitoring Systems • Training • Tourism Development & Promotion • Marketing of Trophy Hunting • Marketing & Harvesting of Veldt Products • Reintroduction & Sale of Game • Advocacy on Conservation Policies/Legislation

  11. Development of Conservancy Management& Monitoring Systems

  12. One of the most basic requirements for managing the wildlife in the region is a tool that will tell conservancies: • how many animals there are • where they are and how they move around the region • population trends of the various species over time Year 1 Year 10

  13. Planning Undertaking Reporting GIS generated planning maps 5 million ha Routes planned from orthophotos Distributions mapped Populations estimated using spatial analyses Zonations derived from satellite images Count zones Route maps Gemsbok Distribution N/W Namibia Example: annual game counts To determine wildlife numbers, trends and distributions…

  14. Grid Cell Date Species Notes East South Trend over MONTHS Eventually a map showing where each incident occurred Use 2kmX2km Grid (hand drawn or GIS) Trend over YEARS MONTHS Monitoring also includes, for example, monitoring incidents of poaching, problem animals, trophy hunting, fishing

  15. Training

  16. Base maps Institutional aspects Annual audits record, for every conservancy each year, progress in many areas: These can be compiled to provide a national overview:

  17. Community Camp Sites • Develop a central Reservation office • Develop ‘tourism routes’ • Standardize sites • Quality control

  18. Joint-Venture Lodges • Joint-Venture Agreements • Identifying new locations

  19. Marketing of Trophy Hunting • Wildlife Management Plan • Quota Application & Approval • Hunting Concession Approval • Trophy Quality Monitoring

  20. Marketing & Harvesting of Veldt Products & Craft production

  21. Reintroduction & Marketing of Game • Create the right environment • Build and maintain releasing facilities • Have wildlife monitoring systems in place

  22. Advocacy on Conservation Policies/Legislation …”What our people want is to be involved in the decision-making process and to actively participate in decisions, which will ultimately affect them. They then will take ownership of these decisions and ensure that they are successfully implemented.” (extract from the Statement by his Excellency President Sam Nujoma on Sept. 26th, 1998) * Conservancy Association(s)

  23. Where are conservancies in Namibia? • Around 78,000 km2, representing 9 % of Namibia, now falls within communal area conservancies • Over 95,000 rural people live within conservancies; around 40% of them are conservancy members • A further 14 % of Namibia is protected under the state Protected Areas network, and 5 % is within conservancies on freehold land

  24. Area under Communal Conservancies 29 registered conservancies 30 emerging = ca. 60000 km2

  25. Committees Representing Diverse Communities >60 Communities mobilized into representative governance bodies

  26. Wildlife Populations & Trends in North-West Namibia Population trends for gemsbok, springbok, and Hartmann’s zebra in NW Namibia from 2000 through 2003 based upon animals observed per 100 kms driven (Source: MET/WWF/NACSO, 2003)

  27. Programmatic Impacts (economic / financial benefits)

  28. Challenges and the Way Forward • Broadening beyond wildlife • Low political profile of wildlife sector • Prevention of aborted devolution • Capacity constraints (National and local levels)

  29. Conclusion Success Through CBNRM Is A Long Road! The Beginning

More Related