1 / 11

ISU / Dec 10 th

ISU / Dec 10 th. Joaquin Peralta, Rupa Dumpala , and Scott Broderick. First simulations / QE. Quantum espresso Convergence parameters Technical Issues Undefined ‘ input_file ’ to add initial velocities. Defining by modifying source code. Alternatives VASP/QE Coding. Initial Simulations.

eyad
Télécharger la présentation

ISU / Dec 10 th

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ISU / Dec 10th Joaquin Peralta, RupaDumpala, and Scott Broderick

  2. First simulations / QE • Quantum espresso • Convergence parameters • Technical Issues • Undefined ‘input_file’ to add initial velocities. • Defining by modifying source code. • Alternatives VASP/QE Coding Initial Simulations

  3. Using VASP • Available VASP versions : 5.3.2 and 4.X • Pseudo potentials • PAW – PBE/LDA • Alternative of request all-electron (very small number of atoms) • Convergence settings • Molecules with considerable vacuum space • Plane Waves must be around 50% more than the used in classical crystalline structures (RAM memory) • Partial occupancies (smearing). In particular for the case of molecules and DM, Fermi-smearing or Gaussian-smearing will be used. • Compilation Issues • Performance • Gamma Point

  4. Si9 Cluster • Original Adri’s group Si cluster of 9 atoms. • Reducing vacuum space size to improve convergence and plane waves. • A cubic cell of 30A it was the first option. • Silicon first because : • Performance Input : ISPIN / ENCUT / NGX • Performance Compiling : Gamma Point / Settings • Vacuum Space, Plane waves and Memory requirements

  5. Si9 / Cluster • Trying to fit best parameters for simulation time • Technical issues with • Cluster platform fails with NPAR major than eight • Compiled version don’t run with a wrong number of NGX, NGY, and NGZ • Not considerable performance improvement with more aggressive compilation • 1 Ionic step/minute  1fs each step  5ps = 83 hours • 1 Ionic step/minute  0.25fs  5ps = 13 days! * Vasp 5.2.11** The simulation didn’t finish.

  6. Si9 - O • Incorporation of Oxygen in the system • Using ISMEAR Associated to the temperature of the input file from Adri’s group. T = 338 K • Oxygen ENCUT increased the time of the RUN. • Technical initial problems / Times • Using 64 CPU / NPAR 4  Work ~1 step/min. • Using 64 CPU / NPAR 8  Faster, but suddenly simulation stop. • Using 128 and 256 CPU • NPAR > 8  Simulation faster ~ 1.5 to 2.0 step/min • Principal problem, after a couple of hours the simulation stop for different problems • Zombie process (Cluster environment problem) • Setup ENCUT / NGX / etc.

  7. Si9 - O

  8. Si9-O

  9. Si9-O • Temperature response

  10. Si-9 • Energy

  11. Next steps • Reduce vacuum space to improve simulation times. • Reduce compiling optimization and disk I/O • Cluster problem(s) • FFT size grid  Better accuracy, slower simulation time. • Based on old NPAR and CPU studies to compare.

More Related