1 / 43

Air Quality and Health Impacts of New Pipelines In West Virginia

Air Quality and Health Impacts of New Pipelines In West Virginia. Prepared for Citizens Meeting Durbin, WV August 7, 2014. Matt Walker and Sam Koplinka-Loehr Clean Air Council. Presentation Overview. Introduction. Air Pollution Sources from Pipelines. Health Impacts of Pollutants.

fahim
Télécharger la présentation

Air Quality and Health Impacts of New Pipelines In West Virginia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Air Quality and Health Impacts of New Pipelines In West Virginia Prepared for Citizens Meeting Durbin, WV August 7, 2014 Matt Walker and Sam Koplinka-Loehr Clean Air Council

  2. Presentation Overview Introduction. Air Pollution Sources from Pipelines. Health Impacts of Pollutants. Extra Resources: Pipeline Information. Regulatory Information. Citizen Action! Photo Source: Bob Donnan: http://www.donnan.com/EPA_Air-Quality_92711.htm

  3. Clean Air Council Marcellus Shale Program Lawsuits against polluters or agencies. Track current rulemaking and write comments on regulations. Work with residents to comment and testify on natural gas equipment. Community actions to achieve goals outside of regulatory pathways.

  4. Air Pollution Sources

  5. Pipeline Leakages CH4

  6. The Guts of a Compressor Station NOx, PM, CO2, VOCs, HAPs, CH4

  7. Fugitive Emissions/Leakages Leakage from Compressor Stations. Source: EPA

  8. Truck Traffic NOx, PM, CO2

  9. Condensate Tanks VOCs & HAPs

  10. Flaring/Venting HAPs, CH4 Source: Frank Finan

  11. Unplanned Events 2012 Columbia Pipeline Group Explosion in Sissonville West Virginia.

  12. Biggest NOx Contributors Adapted from Allen Robinson, http://iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Environment/EnvironmentalHealthRT/2012-Apr-30/Robinson.pdf

  13. Biggest VOC Contributors Adapted from Allen Robinson, http://iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Environment/EnvironmentalHealthRT/2012-Apr-30/Robinson.pdf

  14. Dallas Fort Worth In 2009, the gas industry released more smog-forming emissions than all cars and trucks in the Dallas metro area • New York Times article citing Armendariz’s 2009 report, supported by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/05/27/27greenwire-could-smog-shroud-the-marcellus-shales-natural-3397.html?pagewanted=all

  15. Health Impacts from Pollutants

  16. Pollutants from Shale Gas Infrastructure

  17. 42-inch Pipeline Compressor Stations • Spectra Algonquin Pipeline.

  18. Stony Point Compressor Station Emissions: School Bus Equivalent • Compared to other 42” pipeline compressor stations, emissions could equal 700 constantly idling diesel school buses on average.

  19. Potential Health Impacts from Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) • High levels: • rapid burning, spasms, and swelling of throat and upper respiratory tract. • reduced O2 in tissues. • fluid build-up in lungs. • Low levels: • eye, nose, throat & lung irritation. • coughing, shortness of breath. • tiredness, nausea. Source: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/TF.asp?id=396&tid=69

  20. Potential Health Impacts from Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) VOCs: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/voc.html, Formaldehyde: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts111.pdf , Hydrogen Sulfide: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tf.asp?id=388&tid=67 • Includes known and suspected carcinogens. • Skin, eye, nose, and throat irritation; headaches, loss of coordination, nausea; damage to liver, kidney, and central nervous system over time.

  21. Potential Health Impacts from Fine Particulate Matter • Long-term exposure • Increase in risk of cancer. • Exacerbates lung disease. • Short-term exposure • Eye, nose, and throat irritation.

  22. Ozone VOCs + NOx + Sunlight. Major component of smog. Source of Precursors: compressor engines, engine exhaust, flaring, fugitive methane, open-air impoundments.

  23. Potential Health Impacts from Ozone Source: http://www.epa.gov/air/ozonepollution/health.html American Lung Association, “Health Effects of Ozone and Particle Pollution,” State of the Air, 2011; President’s Cancer Panel, Reducing Environmental Cancer Risk: What We Can Do Now, 2008-2009 Annual Report (National Cancer Institute, May 2010). Aggravation of asthma, bronchitis & emphysema and increased susceptibility to pneumonia & bronchitis. Linked to bladder, breast, and lung cancers, stroke, diabetes, lung damage, and premature death. Throat irritation, congestion, coughing, and chest pain. Wheezing and breathing difficulties.

  24. Other Health Considerations Marvin Resnikoff, Ph.D., Ekaterina Alexandrova, Jackie Travers. May 19, 2010. Radioactivity in Marcellus Shale. Radioactive Waste Management Associates.http://energy.wilkes.edu/PDFFiles/Library/Marcellus%20Shale%20Radioactivity%20Report%205-18-2010.pdf Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Hazard Alert for Worker Exposure to Silica During Hydraulic Fracturing. Retrieved from:http://www.osha.gov/dts/hazardalerts/hydraulic_frac_hazard_alert.html • Silica Dust • The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recently identified airborne silica exposure as a health hazard to workers at fracking operations. • Causes silicosis (lung disease). • Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials • Natural gas in the Marcellus Shale has one of the highest concentrations of cancer-causing NORMS compared to other types of shale deposits. • The DOH and EPA consider radon to be a human carcinogen.

  25. Health Impact Research 2013: McKenzie et al. found elevated risk of birth defects in populations residing within a ten-mile radius of gas wells. 2013: Interdisciplinary group of Texas researchers found toxic chemicals were “strongly associated” with air testing surrounding compressor stations. 2011: A team led by Theo Colburn of the Endocrine Disruptor Exchange found that 25% of chemicals known to be used in fracking fluids are implicated in cancer, 37% in endocrine system disruption, and 75% could affect the skin, eyes and respiratory system. Source: http://concernedhealthny.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/CHPNY-Fracking-Compendium.pdf

  26. Questions? • Matt Walker, mwalker@cleanair.org • Sam Koplinka-Loehr, SKL@cleanair.org

  27. Extra Resources

  28. How Residents Can Protect Public Health

  29. Know Your Rights! For Landowners, you have the right to say no to the pipeline and organize to stop the project. The three companies do not currently have any rights to your land for surveying or any other purpose. You have the right to negotiate for a contract that covers lawyers fees, land remediation, insurance, and any other condition that you want. http://www.cleanair.org/knowyourrights

  30. Regulatory Timeline • Fall 2014: FERC pre-filing process begins for Dominion SE Reliability. • Public comment period begins. • Summer 2015: Dominion formal FERC application. • Filing to intervene in the process gives you the right to request company materials and appeal the decision.

  31. What will the annual emissions from the compressor stations be? Request a public health impact study. What hazardous waste oversight will there be of condensate tanks on site? Best practices for compressor stations: Blowdown Injection Electric Compressors Hazardous Material Management Plan Zero Emission Condensate Tanks Talking points and Questions for FERC and State Agencies

  32. Electric Compressors • Greatly reduce emissions • Depending on gas prices, can pay back within 3 years

  33. Re-routing Blowdown Gas • EPA standards recommend re-routing blowdown gas into sales lines or intersecting pipelines rather than doing an atmospheric release • Greatly reduces emissions • Depending on gas prices, can pay back within 2 years

  34. Reality Check on Regulatory Process

  35. FERC • Industry-funded commission • FERC works to “Promote the development of safe, reliable and efficient energy infrastructure that serves the public interest.” • According to the Office of the President, FERC took action on 92% of pipelines between 2009-2013 with a year • The General Accounting Office has found that average FERC approval time from pre-filing to certification is 558 days • The Pipeline Safety Trust has been unable to find a single instance of FERC denying approval for an interstate gas transmission line Source: http://pstrust.org/docs/PST_Briefing_Paper_09_1.pdf

  36. Community Organizing & Direct Action

  37. Why Pipelines? • Gas Boom • Current daily Marcellus production is 14.5 billion cubic feet • Companies are trying to get gas from the shale fields to national and international markets Source: http://www.ogj.com/articles/uogr/print/volume-2/issue-3/marcellus- continues-to-defy-expectations-driving-us-gas-production-ever-higher.html

  38. Mountain Valley Pipeline • EQT and Nextra Energy joint project • “Open season” just began in June, 2014 Proposed: • 330 miles of pipeline • 42” pipeline diameter • 2 billion cubic feet/day

  39. Southeast Reliability Pipeline • Dominion Resources • Subcontracted land agents & surveying: Doyle Land Services • Dominion plans to initiate FERC process in Fall, 2014 Proposed: • 550 miles • 42” pipeline width • 1.5 billion cubic feet/day Source: https://www.dom.com/business/gas-transmission/southeast-reliability-project/pdf/srp-generic-map.pdf

  40. Spectra Pipeline • Spectra Energy • Currently beginning “open season” • From Southwest Pennsylvania to North Carolina Proposed: • 427 miles • 42” pipeline width • 1.1 billion cubic feet/day

More Related