1 / 24

Electrosurgical Life-test Fixture Team E.L.F. Design Review

Electrosurgical Life-test Fixture Team E.L.F. Design Review. Mechanical Engineers Mary Hamann Brad Watson Naomi Sanders. Electrical Engineers Tony Giedl Jim Michalk. Design Review Outline. Background Problem Definition Project Needs Flow Diagram Components Frame Wand Mount

fairly
Télécharger la présentation

Electrosurgical Life-test Fixture Team E.L.F. Design Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electrosurgical Life-test FixtureTeam E.L.F. Design Review Mechanical Engineers Mary Hamann Brad Watson Naomi Sanders Electrical Engineers Tony Giedl Jim Michalk

  2. Design Review Outline • Background • Problem Definition • Project Needs • Flow Diagram • Components • Frame • Wand Mount • Pressure Control • Angle Adjustment • Tissue Holder • Integrated Design

  3. Background ArthroCare manufactures a device used in surgery for the removal of tissue. This tool is more precise than previous methods of tissue removal and minimizes damage to healthy tissue. Currently, technicians have to hand-test a certain number of Arthro-Wands out of every new batch that is manufactured to ensure the life of each device. This is a very time and labor intensive task. ArthroCare would like an apparatus that is capable of mechanically testing their Arthro-Wands. This will cut down on labor costs of the technicians and allow more wands to be manufactured and tested.

  4. Problem Definition The purpose of this project is to develop a fixture that will automatically test Arthro-Wands. The device has to mimic the condition that the wand will observe during an actual surgery in order to ensure the reliability of the product.

  5. Project Needs • Downsize the footprint of the apparatus (roughly 1/4 original size) • Easy reproducibility • Short set-up time • System completes one lifetime without traveling over used tissue • Capable of accommodating a variety of handle sizes • Adjustable to a variety of angles and positions

  6. Flow Diagram Setup Tissue Fixture Wand Input Time Speed Run Fixture Control Motion Wand Oscillation Increment

  7. Frame Designs Concept #1 – X-Y Gantry Assembly Concept #2 – Last Years Design Concept #3 - “Toy Grabber”

  8. Frame Concept #1X-Y Gantry Assembly linear motion video This Assembly has both the horizontal and vertical linear motion located on the top of the frame. The sinusoidal motion can be created by either an improved scotch yoke or the vertical linear motion lead screw. • Disadvantages: • Vertical Lead Screw located to one side creates a torque on the top lead screw assembly • Frequent direction change on the stepper motors • Indexing of the wand is coupled with oscillatory motion • Advantages: • Smaller Footprint than last years, due to the stationary tray • Could Eliminate Scotch Yoke • Stationary Tray and one moving assembly

  9. Frame Concept #2Last Years Design • Advantages: • Horizontal and vertical motion are de-coupled • No moment created from off-centered lead screw • Slides and Frame material all stock • Could Eliminate the Scotch Yoke • Disadvantages: • Larger Footprint due to moving tray • Frequent direction change of the stepper motors • Both the tray and the tissue mount observe movement Concept #2 is similar to last years design, with the horizontal-motion on the top and the vertical motion on the bottom. The sinusoidal motion can be created by either an improved scotch yoke or the vertical motion of the tray.

  10. Frame Concept #3Toy Grabber This design has the horizontal and vertical motion on top, with both lead screw assemblies having linear motion along the top rails of the frame. In this design the lead screws connect at the location of the wand mount platform. • Advantages: • Decreased moment on the horizontal lead screw assembly • Smaller footprint in the vertical direction due to stationary tray • Eliminates Scotch Yoke • Disadvantage: • Less Space to adjust the position and angle of the wand • Larger Footprint in the horizontal direction due to the vertical motion lead screw and guide rods • Frequent direction change of the stepper motors

  11. Wand Mount Designs Concept #1 – Clamp Concept #2 – Vice Clamp Concept #3 – “Christmas Tree Mount”

  12. Wand Mount Concept #1Clamp This design is a spring loaded clamp that will hold the wand securely in place and will accommodate a variety of sizes • Advantages: • Securely hold a variety of wand sizes and shapes • Pre-manufactured options • Clamp handle easily attaches to the wand mount platform • Prevents motion of the wand during testing • Quick set-up time • Disadvantages: • May not accommodate all sizes of wand handles

  13. Wand Mount Concept #2Vice Clamp • Advantages: • Securely holds a variety of wand sizes and shapes • Accommodates all sizes of wand handles • Quick set-up time This design is a contoured vice clamp that can be adjusted with a screw to fit wand handles of various sizes • Disadvantages: • Doesn’t easily attach to the wand platform • May allow movement of the wand during testing

  14. Wand Mount Concept #3Christmas Tree Mount • Advantages: • Highly adjustable for a variety of wand shapes and sizes • Easily Manufactured This is a mounting device with three equidistant screws that can be adjusted to accommodate any size of wand. • Disadvantages: • Difficult to align in the holder • May allow motion of the wand during testing • Increased set-up time due to the multiple screw adjustment • Does not easily attach to the wand mount platform

  15. Pressure Control Designs Design Concept #1- Spring Load Control Design concept #2 – Gravitational Load Control

  16. Pressure Control Concept #1Spring Load Control This design uses springs to create a constant pressure on the wand and allows vertical motion of the wand with the change in pressure of the test subject • Advantages: • Works at all wand angles • Design fully contained – no separate parts or weights • Disadvantages: • Difficult to set desired pressure • Contains more components • Pressure not always constant

  17. Pressure Control Concept #2Gravitational Load Control • Advantages: • Works at all wand angles • Pressure always constant • Easy set-up This design simply uses gravity to maintain a constant force on the surface of the chicken. The assembly has a set weight applied and it can slide freely up and down with the contours of the chicken. • Disadvantages: • Requires additional parts -need separate weights to apply the constant load

  18. Angle Adjustment Designs Concept #1 – Screw adjustment Concept #2 – Screw Clamped Adjustor Concept #3 - Slotted Runner

  19. Angle Adjustment Concept #1Screw Adjustment A threaded rod is used to attach to the wand holder to the pressure control device. The wand holder can be adjusted to any angle and bolted in place. • Advantages: • Quick set-up time • Fine adjustment capabilities • Easily connected to the wand platform • Disadvantages: • Wand tip is only centered at a vertical angle

  20. Angle Adjustment Concept #2 A rod extending from the wand holder is clamped into the pressure control device. The wand holder can be adjusted to any angle and clamped in place. • Advantages: • Fine adjustment capabilities • Easily connected to the wand platform • Disadvantages: • More complicated set-up • Wand tip is only centered at a vertical angle

  21. Angle Adjustment Concept #3 • Advantages: • Quick and easy adjustment • Wand tip is always centered This is a slotted semi-circular device to which the wand can be attached to in a variety of angles and heights • Disadvantages: • Height differential is limited • Does not connect easily to the wand platform

  22. Tissue Holder Design The design for the tissue holder is essentially the same design as last year’s. A frame is placed over the chicken and bolted down to hold it still during the testing period.

  23. Integrated Design

  24. Assembled Design Components Mass applies constant load on chicken Slider to allow for large vertical adjustment Wand angle set by the wand holder Wand mount slides with the contour of the chicken Tray sits on platform and indexes as well as oscillates the chicken

More Related