1 / 16

Third party interventions in Spanish collective conflicts

Third party interventions in Spanish collective conflicts. Diversity among different systems. Spain: autonomous ADR systems. Mediation since 1996: Agreement for Extrajudicial Labor Conflict Resolution ( ASEC)

farchambault
Télécharger la présentation

Third party interventions in Spanish collective conflicts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Third party interventions in Spanish collective conflicts Diversity among different systems

  2. Spain: autonomous ADR systems • Mediationsince 1996: Agreement for Extrajudicial Labor Conflict Resolution (ASEC) • Signed by the largest trade unions and the most representative employer associations and counts with the support of the national government • The 17 differentAutonomousRegionshavedevelopedtheirown ADR systems University of Seville and KU Leuven

  3. Systems in Spain Servicio Asturiano de Solución Extrajudicial de Conflictos PRECO ORECLA Tribunal Laboral de Navarra AGA Tribunal Laboral de La Rioja SERLA Tribunal Laboral de Cataluña SAMA Instituto Laboral de la Comunidad de Madrid Fundación de relaciones Laborales de Extremadura TAMIB Jurado Arbitral de Castilla la Mancha TAL Fundación Oficina Extrajudicial de Resolución de Conflictos Laborales de Murcia SERCLA Tribunal Laboral de Canarias University of Seville and KU Leuven

  4. Extrajudicial System for Labor Conflict Resolution in Andalusia (SERCLA) • Interprofessionalagreement: employers’ association + 2 largesttradeunions • Organized by the Andalusian Council of Labor Relations (CARL) • Compulsory to apply to SERCLA: • Rights conflicts: yes • Interests conflicts: yes, if threat of strike University of Seville and KU Leuven

  5. SERCLA • Team of 4 mediators→2 fromemployers’ list 2 fromunions’ list • Facilitative role of the mediation office • Free of costs for the parties • Parties are frequentlyrepresentedbyagents (e.g. lawyersorunionrepresentatives) University of Seville and KU Leuven

  6. Description of the process University of Seville and KU Leuven

  7. University of Seville and KU Leuven

  8. Effectiveness: 2017 University of Seville and KU Leuven

  9. Evaluation of the SERCLA University of Seville and KU Leuven

  10. Evaluation of the SERCLA (2017-2018) • Collaboration agreement (US & SERCLA) • Evaluation process Performance (mediation teams & individually) Behaviours & Attitudes System’s procedures Effectiveness Satisfaction with the agreements • Case studies on Successful & Unsuccessful cases • Observations, Quantitative & Qualitative data from the stakeholders (perceptions..) University of Seville and KU Leuven

  11. Mediationproviders& Mediators’ perspective • Self, Peer & Parties’ evaluations of the actual teams are positive • Claimadequatespacestofacilitate & meettheparties • Increasingdemand of more availableexperts • Issuesunderdebate: Stability of themediationteams Specializationbysectors Scarceinitiation and recycling trainings formediators University of Seville and KU Leuven

  12. Employee representatives’ perspective • Role conflict • Representing actual needs of the workforce • Unsufficiently empowered agents at the table (absent often in public sector) • Claim the need of creating awareness campaigns (with the companies) about the SERCLA systems’ functions & possibilities • Perceive their counterparts not as vocationally oriented as themselves University of Seville and KU Leuven

  13. Employer representatives’ perceptions • Minutes of the mediatons often do not reflect all efforts made to reach satisfying agreements • Need of keeping record of key information of the successful cases  follow ups • Express their trust in: the mediation team & counterparts University of Seville and KU Leuven

  14. Strengths of the system • Factorspromotingeffectiveness: • Negotiationabilities of theparties • Trust amongtheparties and onmediators • Follow up ontheagreementsmade • Cooperationmodel of themediationteams • Predisposition, implication & involvement of both social partners in the evaluation & improvement of the system University of Seville and KU Leuven

  15. Promotion of a constructivecontroversy culture • Centralizing the multiple existing procedures • Training opportunities for the mediators & agents • 360º evaluation • Agents’ impartiality, commitment & power to decide • Need for facilitation in earlier stages of the conflict • Rebuilding trust among the parties University of Seville and KU Leuven

  16. University of Seville and KU Leuven

More Related