1 / 9

Generating buy-in and ownership by a new community

Generating buy-in and ownership by a new community. **** Or **** Achieving Faculty Buy-in to a Paradigm shift. Facilitators: Marvin Pitts - WSU Dan Cordon – U of I. Content. First meeting of a multi-session project Identifying sources of Resistance Identifying roadblocks

faye
Télécharger la présentation

Generating buy-in and ownership by a new community

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Generating buy-in and ownership by a new community **** Or **** Achieving Faculty Buy-in to a Paradigm shift Facilitators: Marvin Pitts - WSU Dan Cordon – U of I

  2. Content • First meeting of a multi-session project • Identifying sources of Resistance • Identifying roadblocks • Removing roadblocks • Obtaining a positive outcome for each participant

  3. Identifying Sources of Resistance • Outcomes • Ability to identify sources of resistance within a group • Ability to design a scheme for ranking the severity of various Sources of Resistance to a Paradigm Shift

  4. Generating Ideas via Fishbowl • Center Table – The Fish • Will get to roll play as characters in a changing paradigm (no-doubt you’ve been frustrated by them in your own meetings) • Ignore others outside the table for allotted time • Other Tables – The Observers • Collecting/Recording root issues hindering change displayed by the Fish • Free to move, but do not interact/disrupt what’s happening in the Fishbowl

  5. Scenario A large lower division course is taught in six sessions by a range of instructors. Many of the instructors have taught the course before, some are teaching it for the first time. For many the years the course has been taught using a common set of course objectives, but each instructor determined how their section was taught. Last semester the Associate Dean attended a PCrest workshop on self assessment, and decided that the instructors for this course will self assess their performance, and share these assessments weekly with the other instructors as a means of improving performance. Developing before us is the meeting where the instructors learn they will be self assessing this semester.

  6. Characters • Course Coordinator • Graduate Student • Untenured Faculty member • Tenured Faculty Member • Emeritus Professor • Adjunct Professor

  7. Fear (4) Lack of training (3) Ultimate use (2) Time constraints (6) No perceived value (4) Alignment of expectations (6) Incomplete guidance (2) Lack of strong vision (3) Egos Networks of relationships rather than team(1) Sources • No team work (1) • No common goals • Power issues

  8. Second Activity • 15 minutes to discuss and create a 1.5 minute oral report • Form small groups of 6 to 8 • As a group, develop a scheme for ranking the severity of the identified sources for use in future sessions • Top-Ranking Sources • Time constraints • Alignment of expectations • Fear • Perceived value • Lack of training • Lack of vision

  9. Schemes • Poll (3x5 cards) • Numerical model – percentage, etc • Stakeholders • Resources • Reading literature for other schemes • Gap analysis

More Related