1 / 15

Determinants of Recidivism in Rhode Island’s 2009 P rison P opulation

Determinants of Recidivism in Rhode Island’s 2009 P rison P opulation. Vlad Konopelko , Lucian Drobot , Alex Gemma, David Rodin, Bill Garneau. Topic. RI Recidivism study Recidivist = Repeat offender 28% returned with new sentence 34% were awaiting trial

fell
Télécharger la présentation

Determinants of Recidivism in Rhode Island’s 2009 P rison P opulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Determinants of Recidivism in Rhode Island’s 2009 Prison Population VladKonopelko, Lucian Drobot, Alex Gemma, David Rodin, Bill Garneau

  2. Topic • RI Recidivism study • Recidivist = Repeat offender • 28% returned with new sentence • 34% were awaiting trial • 47% are for new crime rest for probation and parole violation • Important to everyone • Data availability

  3. Objective • Determine which factors impacts repeat offenders • Identify factors that can be influenced through policies

  4. Research History • “The Best Ones Come Out First! Early Release from Prison and Recidivism A Regression Discontinuity Approach” Olivier Marie 2009 • Building Criminal Capital vs Specific Deterrence: The Effect of Incarceration Length on Recidivism. David S. Abrams 2010

  5. Data Set • Starting Data Set • 450,000 data points • 150 variables • 3700 Variables • Ending Data Set • 47,000 data points • 28 Variables • 1670 Subjects

  6. Removed Variables • Redundant Variables • Length of stay, Total stay, % Time served • Variables Insignificant to Our Study • Addresses, birthdays, admittance dates, etc… • Incomplete records • 2000 Inmates did not have all the data points

  7. Condensing the Data • Age Bracket • 32 and Below • 33 and Above • Employment • Under/Unemployed • Employed / Outside of workforce • Housing Status • Homeless/ Living in a shelter • Program Transitional/ Temporary/Permanently residents • Education • High school/GED + • Below high school and no GED

  8. Logistic Regression Model • Depending variable 0 – 1 • The dependent variable is categorical with two possible values • It is based on the odds ratio: odds ratio = Example: odds ratio (for a 0.75 probability of interest)=0.75/(1-0.75)=3 (or 3 to 1)

  9. Logistic Regression Model • Logistic Regression Model: ln (odds ratio)= … • Logistic Regression Equation: ln(estimated odds ratio)= …+

  10. Logistic Regression Model Determine Determine estimated odds ratio Determine estimated probability of an event of interest

  11. Model Results

  12. 32 and Under

  13. Key Indicators

  14. Policies 1 • 5 out of 28 variables • Single vs married • For all: • Age: The higher the age the less likelihood. • Citizenship: US citizen are more likely to return

  15. Policies 2 • For below 33: • Felony vs misdemeanor • Early parole for misdemeanor convicts. • Below GED or High school vs High school/GED • Offer education. • Age admitted • Programs targeting young convicts. • Housing vs Homeless • Invest in programs around housing.

More Related