1 / 18

NEAR-NET SHAPE INJECTION MOLDING OF FRAC BALLS

NEAR-NET SHAPE INJECTION MOLDING OF FRAC BALLS. Presentation by C. Andrew Rosenholm Director of Business Development Bruce Diamond Corp. January 17 th , 2013 ERG Winter Meeting - Houston, TX.

ferrol
Télécharger la présentation

NEAR-NET SHAPE INJECTION MOLDING OF FRAC BALLS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NEAR-NET SHAPE INJECTION MOLDING OF FRAC BALLS Presentation by C. Andrew Rosenholm Director of Business Development Bruce Diamond Corp. January 17th, 2013 ERG Winter Meeting - Houston, TX

  2. The standard ball used today in sliding-sleeve hydraulic fracking is manufactured from G10/FR4 - a thermosetting industrial fiber glass composite laminate consisting of a continuous filament glass cloth material with an epoxy resin binder. • There is a “weak” and “strong” plane to laminated balls due to the two-dimensional nature of the layup – nearly a 50% difference in strength

  3. G10/FR4 BALLS INEFFICIENT METHOD OF MANUFACTURE FROM PLATE TO SPHERE

  4. STEP 1: SAW PLATE INTO BARS, THEN CUT INTO SQUARES

  5. STEP 2: TURN SQUARE BLANK INTO A SPHERE

  6. STEP 3: GRIND TURNED SPHERE INTO BALL

  7. 56% OF THE MATERIAL IS WASTED!

  8. INJECTION MOLDING: A MORE EFFICIENT METHOD OF MANUFACTURE

  9. INJECTION MOLDED BALLS ARE FORMED TO NEAR-NET-SHAPE PRIOR TO GRINDING – NO TURNING OR MACHINING NECESSARY!

  10. INJECTION MOLDING CAN REPLACE COMPOSITE AND THERMOSET MATERIALS FOR A FRACTION OF THE COST!

  11. ADVANTAGES OF INJECTION MOLDING: • WIDE RANGE OF MECHANICAL AND THERMAL PROPERTIES TO CHOOSE FROM • SPECIFIC GRAVITIES RANGE FROM A LITTLE MORE THAN WATER TO AS HEAVY AS LEAD

  12. WHAT LITTLE WASTE THERE IS CAN BE REGROUND AND REUSED • MOLDING MACHINE CYCLE TIMES ARE A FRACTION OF THE TIME IT TAKES TO MACHINE COMPOSITE

  13. A UNIQUE QUALITY OF INJECTION MOLDED BALLS IS NON-DIRECTIONALITY, I.E.: THERE IS NO “WEAK” ORIENTATION TO THE BALL

  14. ADDITIONAL FEATURES POSSIBLE • WITH INJECTION MOLDING: • MULTI-LAYER BALL (THINK GOLF BALL) – MULTI-MATERIAL • INSERTED RFID CHIPS • INSERTED TRACERS

  15. ARE INJECTION MOLDED BALLS AS GOOD AS G10 BALLS USED IN SLIDING-SLEEVE HYDRAULIC FRACTURING? CUSTOM PEEK and PAI RESINS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED AND TESTED THAT HAVE PROPERTIES SUPERIOR TO G10 – LIGHTER AND STRONGER

  16. CAN THERMOPLASTICS SUBSTITUTE FOR THE HEAVY PHENOLIC BALLS USED WITH PLUG-AND-PERF FRAC PLUGS? INJECTION MOLDED BALLS IN 1.000” ⌀ , 1.750” ⌀ AND 2.125” ⌀ ARE IN USE THAT PERFORM BETTER THAN PHENOLIC AND COST LESS

  17. CONCLUSION: TWO YEARS OF PHYSICAL TESTING USING INDUSTRY-STANDARD TEST EQUIPMENT AND METHODS HAS LED TO THE SELECTION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RESINS WE ARE MOLDING WITH CURRENTLY. R&D CONTINUES WITH NEW RESINS BEING SAMPLED CONTINUOUSLY.

  18. Brought to you by: www.brucediamondcorp.com/frac

More Related