1 / 14

Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement

Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement. Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>. IETF86 March 2013. Motivation and Rationale. R-LFA implementation requires more tight integration of LDP and IGP B i-directional notification path between protocols

finian
Télécharger la présentation

Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs draft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Advertising MPLS labels in IGPsdraft-gredler-rtgwg-igp-label-advertisement HannesGredler <hannes@juniper.net> IETF86 March2013

  2. Motivation and Rationale • R-LFA implementation requires more tight integration of LDP and IGP • Bi-directional notification path between protocols • MPLS transport label distribution are Session oriented protocols • You need to have a session with a neighbor in order to receive/distribute bindings • Interesting use cases for >1 hop distribution of transport labels

  3. Use case #1Increase (R-)LFA coverage

  4. Pathologic Topologies

  5. Add one-hop strict forwarding labels (stack ‘em)

  6. Use case #2TE by label-stacking

  7. TE by label stacking per-neighbor labels

  8. Use case #3Advertising TE LSPs

  9. Advertise RSVP LSPs as Forwarding AdjacencyIssue: LSP path properties lost

  10. Advertise existing LSPs & EROs-> Allows path property correlation

  11. Use case #4EGRESS WAN SDN CONTROL(ER)

  12. Current TE framework only offers egress Node control.-> No good Egress Link control

  13. SDN ECMP weight controller and per-neighbor label

  14. Next Steps • Yesterday (20130313) submission isis-wg • draft-previdi-filsfils-isis-segment-routing-00 • Core is advertising “segments” for source routing • IGP disseminates “segment” • Some similarities (IGP label) • Some discrepancies (Advertising existing labels, Gloab labels) • Working with authors to assess draft merge

More Related