1 / 51

Joint Design of Routing and Medium Access Control for Hybrid Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Joint Design of Routing and Medium Access Control for Hybrid Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Mobile Networks and Applications (January 2007) Presented by J.H. Su ( 蘇至浩 ). Authors(1/2). Xiaojiang (James) Du Received the Ph.D. degrees from University of Maryland College Park in electrical engineering.

finn-gardner
Télécharger la présentation

Joint Design of Routing and Medium Access Control for Hybrid Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint Design of Routing and Medium Access Controlfor Hybrid Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Mobile Networks and Applications (January 2007) Presented by J.H. Su (蘇至浩) OPLab, IM, NTU

  2. Authors(1/2) • Xiaojiang (James) Du • Received the Ph.D. degrees from University of Maryland College Park in electrical engineering. • An Assistant Professor with the Department of Computer Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo. • His research interests are wireless sensor networks, mobile ad hoc networks, wireless networks, computer networks, network security, and network management. OPLab, IM, NTU

  3. Authors(2/2) • Dapeng Wu • Received the Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engineering from Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, in 2003. • Has been with Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, as an Assistant Professor. • His research interests are in the areas of networking, communications, multimedia, signal processing, and information and network security. OPLab, IM, NTU

  4. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  5. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  6. Introduction (1/2) • Most existing routing protocols assume homogeneous MANETs. • Gupta and Kumar showed that per node capacity of a homogeneous wireless network is only w/√ (nlogn) • W is the node transmission capacity • n is the number of nodes OPLab, IM, NTU

  7. Introduction (2/2) • Furthermore, in many realistic ad hoc networks, nodes are hybrid. • in a battlefield network • In this paper, we present a new routing protocol—Hybrid Routing (HR) protocol for hybrid MANETs. • node location information is used to reduce routing overhead OPLab, IM, NTU

  8. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  9. Assumption of HR (1/2) • For simplicity, we consider there are only two types of nodes in the network. • Backbone-Capable nodes • general nodes • The main idea of HR protocol is to let most routing activities rely on B-nodes. • provides better reliability and fault tolerance • routing packets via B-nodes is more efficient than using general nodes • reduces the routing overhead and latency OPLab, IM, NTU

  10. Assumption of HR (2/2) • The routing area is divided into several small, equal-sized squares—referred to as cells. • In HR protocol, we assume the routing area is fixed. • the position of each cell is also fixed • There is a unique id for each cell. • One (and only one) B-node is elected and maintained in each cell, and each B-node has a second address. • B-node can always communicate directly with B-nodes in all nearby cells. OPLab, IM, NTU

  11. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing • Routing among B-nodes • Route Discovery • Route Repair • Dissemination of Node Location Information • Election of B-node • Hybrid MAC (HMAC) • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  12. Routing among B-nodes (1/2) • B-nodes use their second addresses to communicate with each other. • A straight line L is drawn between the centers of cell CS and Cd. • Two border lines (blue lines) which parallel to line L with distance of W from L are drawn from CS to Cd. • the value of W depends on the density of BC-nodes in the network • All the cells that are within the two border lines are defined as routing cells. OPLab, IM, NTU

  13. Routing among B-nodes (2/2) W W OPLab, IM, NTU

  14. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing • Routing among B-nodes • Route Discovery • Route Repair • Dissemination of Node Location Information • Election of B-node • Hybrid MAC (HMAC) • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  15. Route Discovery (1/4) • Consider a node S wants to send a data packet to a destination node D. • Case 1 : S is a B-node • Case 2 : S is a general node • S needs to know the current location of the destination node D. • Then S determines the routing cells between S and Bd, and sends Route Request (RR) packets to B-nodes in routing cells. OPLab, IM, NTU

  16. Route Discovery (2/4) • The RRpacket includes the following fields: • Starting_B-node • Next_cells • Routing_cells • Path • Destination_cell OPLab, IM, NTU

  17. Route Discovery (3/4) D 13 14 16 9 10 11 12 5 6 7 8 1 2 4 OPLab, IM, NTU S 3

  18. Route Discovery (4/4) • If S does not receive a RP from Bs for a certain time: • S will initiate a B-node elecion • If Bs does not receive a RP from Bd for a certain time: • Bs will flood the RR packet to all B-nodes in the network • If Bd does not receive the Ack for a certain time • Bd will hold the data packet (before receiving Ack) and request the updated location information of node D • then Bd can send the data packet to the B-node closest to the new location of D OPLab, IM, NTU

  19. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing • Routing among B-nodes • Route Discovery • Route Repair • Dissemination of Node Location Information • Election of B-node • Hybrid MAC (HMAC) • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  20. Route Repair (1/2) OPLab, IM, NTU

  21. Route Repair (2/2) • The RE packet includes the following fields: • Repairing_B-node • Next_cell • Routing_cells • Destination_cell • Destination_ node • Path OPLab, IM, NTU

  22. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing • Routing among B-nodes • Route Discovery • Route Repair • Dissemination of Node Location Information • Election of B-node • Hybrid MAC (HMAC) • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  23. Dissemination of Node Location Information • When a node moves out of its previous cell, it sends a location update packet (with its new location) to the B-node in the new cell (or the nearest B-node). • All B-nodes periodically send aggregated node location information to a special B-node B0. • If B0 also moves around, then B0 needs to multicast its current location to all B-nodes OPLab, IM, NTU

  24. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing • Routing among B-nodes • Route Discovery • Route Repair • Dissemination of Node Location Information • Election of B-node • Hybrid MAC (HMAC) • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  25. Election of B-node (1/2) • Initially, one B-node is elected in each cell if there are BC-nodes available in the cell. • Following events Initiates the B-node election process: • a B-node moves out of its current cell • a general node discovers there is no B-node in the cell OPLab, IM, NTU

  26. Election of B-node (2/2) • The election process works as following: • the leaving B-node or the general node floods an election message to all the nodes in the cell • when a BC-node receives the election message, it broadcasts a claim message that claims it will become the B-node to all nodes in the cell (each BC-node defers a random time before its B-node claim) • if other BC-node hears a claim message during this random time, it then gives up its broadcast. OPLab, IM, NTU

  27. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing • Routing among B-nodes • Route Discovery • Route Repair • Dissemination of Node Location Information • Election of B-node • Hybrid MAC (HMAC) • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  28. Hybrid MAC (1/2) • The key idea is to combinetime-slotted mechanism with contention based mechanism. • A large time frame is divided into three sub-frames • G-to-G • B-to-B • B-to-G OPLab, IM, NTU

  29. Hybrid MAC (2/2) • Inside each sub-frame, the corresponding nodes use contention-based mechanism— IEEE 802.11b to decide which node should transmit packets. • The sub-frame length depends on the amount of traffic of each subtype. OPLab, IM, NTU

  30. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Experiment Setting • Routing overhead under different mobility • Routing overhead vs. transmission range • Throughput under different traffic load • Delay comparison • Scalability • The performance of HMAC • The probability of having B-nodes • Performance for different BC-node densities • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  31. Experiment Setting(1/3) • there are totally 20 time-slots • G-to-G sub-frame takes eight timeslots • B-to-B sub-frame takes eight time-slots • B-to-G sub-frame takes four time-slots • we present the simulations performed by distributing 100 nodes uniformly at random in an area of 1,000×1,000 m. • 25 Backbone-Capable (BC) nodes • 75 General nodes OPLab, IM, NTU

  32. Experiment Setting(2/3) • The transmission range of a B-node and a general node is 400 and 100 m. • The side length of a cell is set as a=R/1.6. • There are 16 cells in the routing area • The width of the routing cells—W is set to 0 OPLab, IM, NTU

  33. Experiment Setting(3/3) • Each simulation was run for 600 simulated seconds. • The source sent packet of 512 b at a rate of four packets per second. • We ran each simulation ten times to get an average result for each simulation configuration. • We compared our HR protocol with AODV (Ad-hoc on demand distance vector) routing protocol. OPLab, IM, NTU

  34. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Experiment Setting • Routing overhead under different mobility • Routing overhead vs. transmission range • Throughput under different traffic load • Delay comparison • Scalability • The performance of HMAC • The probability of having B-nodes • Performance for different BC-node densities • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  35. Routing overhead under different mobility OPLab, IM, NTU

  36. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Experiment Setting • Routing overhead under different mobility • Routing overhead vs. transmission range • Throughput under different traffic load • Delay comparison • Scalability • The performance of HMAC • The probability of having B-nodes • Performance for different BC-node densities • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  37. Routing overhead vs. transmission range OPLab, IM, NTU

  38. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Experiment Setting • Routing overhead under different mobility • Routing overhead vs. transmission range • Throughput under different traffic load • Delay comparison • Scalability • The performance of HMAC • The probability of having B-nodes • Performance for different BC-node densities • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  39. Throughput under different traffic load OPLab, IM, NTU

  40. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Experiment Setting • Routing overhead under different mobility • Routing overhead vs. transmission range • Throughput under different traffic load • Delay comparison • Scalability • The performance of HMAC • The probability of having B-nodes • Performance for different BC-node densities • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  41. Delay comparison OPLab, IM, NTU

  42. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Experiment Setting • Routing overhead under different mobility • Routing overhead vs. transmission range • Throughput under different traffic load • Delay comparison • Scalability • The performance of HMAC • The probability of having B-nodes • Performance for different BC-node densities • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  43. Scalability AODV-S AODV-L HR-S HR-L OPLab, IM, NTU

  44. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Experiment Setting • Routing overhead under different mobility • Routing overhead vs. transmission range • Throughput under different traffic load • Delay comparison • Scalability • The performance of HMAC • The probability of having B-nodes • Performance for different BC-node densities • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  45. The performance of HMAC- Throughput OPLab, IM, NTU

  46. The performance of HMAC- Delay OPLab, IM, NTU

  47. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Experiment Setting • Routing overhead under different mobility • Routing overhead vs. transmission range • Throughput under different traffic load • Delay comparison • Scalability • The performance of HMAC • The probability of having B-nodes • Performance for different BC-node densities • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  48. Performance for different BC-node densities OPLab, IM, NTU

  49. Agenda • Introduction • Assumption of HR • Hybrid Routing Protocol • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion OPLab, IM, NTU

  50. Conclusion • Proposed Hybrid Routing Protocol to resolve routing problem in different type of node. • An efficient algorithm is provided to disseminate node location information among all B-nodes. • Proposed a novel HMAC protocol that can improve the efficiency of medium access in hybrid MANETs. OPLab, IM, NTU

More Related