1 / 6

Group 4

Group 4. Workshop 1. Chairman: Prof. Dr. Rahman B. Talukder Facilitator: Mr. Pen Sithol, Mr. Ibnu Hadjar, Prof. Muhammad Sajidin, Mr. Muhammad Ismail Dr. Kazi A. Kalpoma Rapporteur: Dr. Kazi A. Kalpoma. Identify the QA process that is in place right now in Bangladesh.

fleur
Télécharger la présentation

Group 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group 4 Workshop 1 Chairman: Prof. Dr. Rahman B. Talukder Facilitator: Mr. Pen Sithol, Mr. Ibnu Hadjar, Prof. Muhammad Sajidin, Mr. Muhammad Ismail Dr. Kazi A. Kalpoma Rapporteur: Dr. Kazi A. Kalpoma

  2. Identify the QA process that is in place right now in Bangladesh • Each university has a syndicate and an internal Academic Council. • There is no Quality Assurance Agency present in Bangladesh. Quality Assurance Agency is in the making. • University Academic Council and/or Syndicate committee do work only for the academic programs and not for Quality Assurance. • Academic Council is the highest body for the academic programs and only assess the quality within the departments or within the faculties.

  3. Concerns for HEIs regarding QA in Bangladesh • Different aspects of quality from different stakeholders. • At least minimum level of quality should be confirmed by every stakeholders • In general, the compatibility of the curriculum with the International standards is missing. • In the absence of QA, the quality of education is deteriorating in some cases. • Due to increase in the workload, the Academic Council and other statutory bodies are unable to concentrate on QA.

  4. Proposed Actions for the Concerns • The Higher Education Council should establish QECs (Quality Enhancement/Evaluation Cells) in all individual universities in Bangladesh. (as followed in Pakistan –Prof Muhammad Sajidin) • Group Chairman Prof Rahman suggested that QECs should work with the guidelines or frameworks suggested by Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). • All Universities should meet minimum standards of quality education • QA framework: • Self assessment of programs • University’s internal review • External review • Self assessment program • Student feedback • Faculty feedback • Employers’ survey • Alumni survey • Graduating student survey • Course evaluation by faculty

  5. Aspects • Mission, Vision and Objectives • Organizational Structure and Management • Students and Student Services • Admission, learning process, exams/evaluations, co/extra-curriculum, attendance /discipline • Faculty • Qualification, Instructional proficiency, research/publication, self development • Curriculum • International compatibility, relevant to social and market needs, periodical review • Physical Facility • Library, classrooms, laboratories, computing facilities, other resources • Internal Quality Assurance System

  6. THANK YOU

More Related