1 / 17

Abstract is available at beleanavoidcancer.wordpress/portfolio/ under article abstract

Analyzing the current returns and potential market by harvest method for irrigated west texas cotton. Abstract is available at http://beleanavoidcancer.wordpress.com/portfolio/ under article abstract Janani Thapa Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics

floria
Télécharger la présentation

Abstract is available at beleanavoidcancer.wordpress/portfolio/ under article abstract

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analyzing the current returns and potential market by harvest method for irrigated west texas cotton Abstract is available at http://beleanavoidcancer.wordpress.com/portfolio/under article abstract Janani Thapa Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas

  2. Cotton Market Figure 1: Average production and export of cotton • Global demand -- ring spinning applications • Market prefers highly uniform fibers with less neps (000) bales Source: www.nass.usda.gov

  3. Texas in US cotton production Figure 2: US cotton belt • Texas is the largest producer of cotton in US. • Traditional use of West Texas cotton is rotor spinning. Figure 4: Yield share by states US cotton belt Figure 3: Yield lbs/planted acre in Texas • Due to introduction of long staple varieties. Source: www.nass.usda.gov

  4. Texas Cotton Farmers New varieties improved returns to West Texas cotton farmers by $ 1 million a year Dr. Carl Anderson ……….But are West Texas cotton farmers receiving potential returns with using traditional stripper harvesting methods

  5. The Analysis • Using varieties with strong genetic potential • Irrigated production • Harvesting costs evaluated • Ginned with appropriate sequence to maintain fiber quality

  6. Objective Will shifting to picker harvest be financially rewarding for farmers: • Determine quality differences • Determine cost and yield differences • Determine if improved markets served is possible

  7. Data Yield and quality data of fibers from actual field (irrigated, variety Fiber Max) for three cotton marketing years - 2009, 2010 and 2011 under picker harvest-picker ginning and stripper harvest-stripper ginning sequence.

  8. Product Flow from Field to Market by Harvest Method

  9. Harvesting and Ginning Cost Picker Higher cost from stripper Stripper

  10. Seed Cotton Yield Picker Higher seed cotton yield from stripper Stripper

  11. Lint Yield Picker Higher lint yield from stripper Stripper

  12. Current Revenue Picker Higher revenue from stripper Stripper

  13. Current Profit Picker Little difference in overall profit Stripper

  14. SJV South Texas E/M 1 E/M 2 Traditional MarketSegments by Quality Demands Higher return Higher quality specification

  15. Potential Market Access Hence, picker harvested cotton fibers can at least meet the quality standards of market segment E/M 2 (average premium 40).

  16. Summary • Little difference in returns from picker and stripper harvesting methods in traditional markets • Picker harvested West Texas cotton meets higher segment market quality including short fiber content, neps • A focused effort to produce irrigated, picker harvested cotton appears to be promising

  17. Lessons learned • You should select your venue before hand • Do enough literature search • Make sure you have your concept clear • Make sure your data set is appropriate

More Related