1 / 8

DiffServ Support in MPLS Networks

DiffServ Support in MPLS Networks. References: Juniper white paper: “Supporting Differentiated Service Classes: Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)” IETF RFC3270: “Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Support of Differentiated Services”. DiffServ Enabled MPLS.

frisco
Télécharger la présentation

DiffServ Support in MPLS Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DiffServ Support in MPLS Networks References: Juniper white paper: “Supporting Differentiated Service Classes: Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)” IETF RFC3270: “Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Support of Differentiated Services”

  2. DiffServ Enabled MPLS • DiffServ traffic now follows an LSP directed path rather than connectionless IP paths • More predictable in terms of resource consumption and less over provisioning • Resources associated with an LSP can be reserved to provide highly predictable services

  3. DiffServ Enabled MPLS Two types of DiffServ enabled LSPs: • EXP Inferred LSP (E-LSP): the class information is in the EXP sub-field of the MPLS shim header • Label only inferred LSP (L-LSP): the class information is implied by the label value

  4. DiffServ Enabled MPLS • An example of an E-LSP:

  5. DiffServ Enabled MPLS • An example of an E-LSP:

  6. DiffServ Enabled MPLS • Benefits of E-LSP: • The operation of DiffServ over MPLS using E-LSPs is similar to the operation of DiffServ over native IP packets in the core. • Assuming a default PHB-to-EXP mapping, E-LSPs are supported by existing signaling and label distribution protocols without modification • Reducing the total number of LSPs • Limitations of E-LSP: • When an existing E-LSP is preempted, all service classes are preempted • Traffic engineering at aggregate level not per class level • Limited to 8 classes

  7. DiffServ Enabled MPLS • An example of L-LSPs:

  8. DiffServ Enabled MPLS • Benefits of L-LSP: • Better capability in supporting guaranteed services • Allowing per class based traffic engineering • Allowing LSP established across an ATM network • May support more than 8 classes • Limitations of L-LSP: • Dynamic creating of an L-LSP is not supported by the existing label distribution protocols • Manual configuration can be complex and time consuming • Adding complexity to network management to support higher number of LSPs

More Related