1 / 29

U+U Collisions at RHIC

U+U Collisions at RHIC. Columbia Experimental Heavy-Ion Research Group Journal Club 27 Feb 2007. Outline. Introduction to the 238 U nucleus Fun facts Definition of quadrupole moment How do we accelerate ions at RHIC? Overview Tandem source/acceleration Onward to RHIC U+U Collisions

gabby
Télécharger la présentation

U+U Collisions at RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. U+U Collisions at RHIC Columbia Experimental Heavy-Ion Research Group Journal Club 27 Feb 2007

  2. D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  3. Outline • Introduction to the 238U nucleus • Fun facts • Definition of quadrupole moment • How do we accelerate ions at RHIC? • Overview • Tandem source/acceleration • Onward to RHIC • U+U Collisions • Anisotropic Flow and Jet Quenching • Multiplicity distribution and source deformation D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  4. 238U D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  5. Fun facts about Uranium • Z = 92, A=233, 235, 238 (three natural isotopes) • Not rare – more common than beryllium or tungsten • Solid at 298 K • Metallic grey in color D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  6. Electric Quadrupole Moments • Non-zero quadrupole moment indicates that the charge distribution is not spherically symmetric • Q0 is the classical form of the calculation • Represents the departure from spherical symmetry in the rest frame of the nucleus • Q is the quantum mechanical form • Takes into account the nuclear spin I and projection K in the z-direction Q(U)>0 D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  7. Accelerating Ions at RHIC D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  8. Overview of the Transport to RHIC • LINAC for source of protons • Two Tandem Van-der-Graff accelerators available • Allows asymmetric collisions, for example • Heavy-ion Transfer Line • AGS Booster • AGS • AGS-to-RHIC Transfer Line D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  9. Originating Source of Heavy Ions • Positive Cs ions strike sputter target • Ions emerging from target have picked up one electron • Ions accelerated thru extraction potential of approximately 25 kV D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  10. Accelerating Ions at the Tandem • Beam passing thru carbon foils strips off electrons • Multiple stages of acceleration/stripping used (2 or 3 depending on A of species) • Au Ions exit the tandem in +32 state D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  11. Tandem to RHIC • Heavy Ion Transfer Line transports ions (with no additional stripping or acceleration) to the Booster • Foil at the Booster exit strips all but two tightly bound K-shell electrons • Au ions exit the booster at 95 MeV/A with +77 charge • AGS accelerates (Au) bunches to ~9 GeV/A • At the AGS exit, ions are fully stripped • Transported to RHIC via the AGS-to-RHIC (AtR) line • In ~ 2 min, RHIC can acclerate ions to top energy D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  12. Current Capabilities of RHIC • RHIC can accelerate range of species from p to Au • Which ions specifically? Those which can be easily produced from a sputter source • Major issue: U does not form an abundant negative ion, making acceleration from sputter target a challenge • Using a sputter target drilled out in the middle to allow O2 into bleed in – result: UO- ions accelerated (Benjamin et al. 1999) • “Uranium is a viable species but must be considered as a future upgrade, since at present, an adequate source for Uranium does not exist at Brookhaven and further R & D will be needed to achieve this goal” • H. Hahn et al., NIM A488 (2003) 245-263 D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  13. Future Capabilities of RHIC EBIS: Electron Beam Ion Source • Replace 35-year-old tandem by 2009 • Advantages: • Simpler operation at lower cost • Simpler booster injection • New species available: U, 3He Scaled results from ½ length prototype exceed RHIC needs D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  14. Location of EBIS W. Fischer, PANIC05 D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  15. U+U: Anisotropy and Jet Quenching D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  16. (initial entropy density of overlap region) 1a. U+U: Anisotropic Flow • The final momentum anisotropy v2 is driven by the initial spatial eccentricity ex • Systematic studies of v2 at midrapidity in Au+Au and Pb+Pb of different centralities show: • v2/ ex scales with • Predictions from ideal hydro agree with data only in the highest RHIC energy at almost central Au+Au collisions • Need to increase beyond the ~ 25 fm-2 available in central Au+Au • U+U to the rescue: full-overlap collisions could achieve ~ 40 fm-2 D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  17. 1b. U+U: Jet Quenching • Experiments show that in semi-peripheral Au+Au collisions fast partons suffer more energy loss in the direction perpendicular to the RP compared to the in-plane direction • Small size of fireball in semi-periph Au+Au lacks resolving power of the path length difference between in- and out-of-plane directions • Again, full-overlap U+U to the rescue D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  18. Full-overlap (b=0 and coplanar) U+U Collisions Very important assumption: we can select these collisions with tight spectator cuts “Side-on-side” “Tip-on-tip” Or “Edge-on-edge” Initial entropy density in transverse plane @ z=0 Binary collision density Wounded nucleon density • = 0.75, from fit to Au+Au ks tuned to central Au+Au also D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  19. Initial Energy and Entropy Density vs. Npart Conversion of entropy density to energy density assumes ideal quark-gluon gass EOS Larger energy density in central U+U yields larger lever arm to probe approach to ideal hydro D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  20. Multiplicity and Eccentricity Probabilities Model fluctuations with probability density for n = dNch/dy Initial eccentricity in overlap region Integrate over F • Eccentricity probability distribution for • cuts shown to the left • Full-overlap collisions vary from 0-0.25 <n>(F) computed from transverse integral over s(rT;F) D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  21. Aside: Multiplicity Fluctuations nucl-ex/0409015 Total multiplicity Multiplicity of 4 highest centrality bins Analogous centrality-selected (b=0) multiplicity distribution D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  22. Estimating Radiative Energy Loss • Compare energy loss of inward-moving partons • t0: parton density constant • t: includes dilution due to longitudinal expansion • Difference in e-loss between in- and out- emission is 2x Au+Au • Better discriminating power Look familiar? D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  23. U+U: Multiplicity and Source Deformation D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  24. (initial entropy density of overlap region) 2. Multiplicity Distribution for Full-overlap U+U • Assuming we can select full-overlap (b=0, coplanar nuclei) collisions with ZDC signal, cutting on multiplicity we can select different spatial deformations of overlap zone Centrality dependence of dNch/dy Tuning a and ks Integrate over F to obtain multiplicity probability distribution. D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  25. Allowing for misalignment • Slightly misaligned tip-on-tip and fully aligned side-on-side collisions can have the same Npart (and ZDC signal) • Assessing the effect of imperfect overlap requires the inclusion of noncentral U+U collisions • In general, need to characterize collision with 5 variables • Impact parameter b • Euler angles of orientation of U: W = (F, b) Initial entropy density becomes: Region of full-overlap events D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  26. Cutting on number of spectators • Number of spectator nucleons: Nspec = 2 x 238 - Npart • Selecting low-spectator events biases sample towards • b ~ 0 and F1,2 ~ 0 • Symmetry axes of nuclei approximately parallel • Result: single-peaked mult dist whose center shifts left as spectator cut loosens tight loose ~0-5% D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  27. Effect on eccentricity distribution • For sufficiently tight spectator cuts, expect events corresponding to left edge of mult dists to have larger contribution from side-on-side collisions • Therefore, cutting on low spectators and low multiplicity should select strongly deformed overlap regions • Loosening the spectator cut broadens the eccentricity distributions • Allows contributions from non-zero impact parameter • Thus ex can exceed 0.25 Impact: have ability to select spatial deformation of collision zone D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  28. Summary • The authors show that full-overlap U+U collisions at RHIC can be used to: • Test the hydro behavior of elliptic flow to energy densities much higher than available to non-central Au+Au • Produce highly-deformed reaction zones to explore more detailed study of path-length dependence of energy loss by a fast parton as it passes thru the plasma • Full-overlap collisions can be selected by tight cuts on the number of spectators (i.e. ZDC signal) • Further cuts on the multiplicity of low-spectator events can discriminate between degrees of spatial deformation of the fireball • Via correlation with “side-on-side-ness” of collision • This approach is reasonably robust against trigger inefficiencies • Extracting physics from U+U collision program at RHIC is feasible D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

  29. References • “Tandem Injected Relativistic Heavy Ion Facility at Brookhaven, Present and Future” P. Thieberger et al., NIM A268 (1988) 513-521 • “The RHIC Design Review” H. Hahn et al., NIM A499 (2003) 245-263 • “Anisotropic Flow and Jet Quenching in Ultrarelativistic U+U Collisions” U. Heinz and A. Kuhlman, PRL 94, 132301 (2005) • “Multiplicity distribution and source deformation in full-overlap U+U collisions” A. Kuhlman and U. Heinz, PRC 72, 037901 (2005) D.Winter: U+U Collisions at RHIC

More Related