Fast and Reliable Estimation Schemes in RFID Systems

1. Fast and Reliable Estimation Schemes in RFID Systems Murali Kodialam and Thyaga Nandagopal Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies

2. RFID, Radio Frequency Identification, is not a new subject that is going to be proposed anymore. • It is an identification tag that stores the identity of something. • It is very simple and cheap to be largely produced. • It has been used in various application ranging from inventory control and tracking to medical-patient management. What is RFID?

3. Most of them are designed to have a very long life. • It is because they are not designed to use any existing energy sources for transmitting data. • Instead, a probe signal sent by a reader node is used as energy for data transmission. • The probe itself can be performed via magnetic coupling (called near-field) or electro-magnetic coupling (called far-field). • Nowadays, the probe has much larger range and is designed to read hundreds of tags at a time. What is RFID? (cont.)

4. Passive tags • Semi-passive tags • Active tags Classification of RFID

5. Some applications need to estimate the number of tags as fast as possible for a givenaccuracy • Two major problems arise in anyRFIDdeployment • Identification • Estimation • Existing protocols are not fast enough Common problem that arise

6. The idea is described as following: the reader probes a set of tags, and the tags reply back. • Since it operates in the wireless medium, Collisions might happen in the process of probing a set of tags. • To hinder the collisions, anti-collision schemes needed to be applied into the identification algorithms. Identification Algorithm

7. Probabilistic • Deterministic Identification Algorithm

8. The reader communicates through a framed ALOHA scheme length and the tags pick a particular slot in the frame to transmit. • This process is repeated by the reader until all tags have transmitted at least once successfully in a slot without collisions. • In semi-passive and active tag systems, the reader can acknowledge tags that have succeeded at the end of each frame, therefore it shorts the overall identification time. • In passive tags, all tags will continue to transmit in every frame, which lengthens the total time needed to identify all tags. Probabilistic Identification Algorithm

9. The reader identifies the set of tags that need to transmit in a given slot, and tries to seduce the contending tag set in the next slot based on the result in the previous slot. • These algorithms fall into the class of tree-based identification algorithms, such as a binary tree. • On the binary tree, the tags are classified based on their id and the reader moving down the tree at each step to identify all nodes. • Deterministic algorithms are typically faster than probabilistic schemes in terms of actual tag response slots used, however, they suffer from large reader overhead since address ranges need to be specified to isolate contending tag subsets using a probe at the beginning of each slot. Deterministic Identification Algorithm

10. An estimation of the actual number of tags tin the system is required by both of the algorithms. • The estimation is used: • To set the optimal frame size in framed ALOHA. • To guide the tree-based identification process for computing the expected number of slots needed for identification. • The estimation process should also be able to use non-identifiable information, such as a string of bits used by all tags, to compute the size of the tag set t. Algorithm Requirements.

11. readers and tags • Use a Listen-before-Talk model approach, where tags listen to the reader’s request before they talk back. System Model

12. Assumption on the model: • There exist a separate estimation phase for identification process. • Framed-slotted ALOHA model is used for tags to transmit back to the reader. • The tags respond with a bit-string that contains some error-detection (such as CRC) embedded in the string when probed by the reader in the estimation phase. The length of this common bit-string is defined as the minimum length string such that the reader can detect collisions when multiple tags transmit the same string in a given slot. The reader can thus detect collisions in the estimation phase and identify a successful transmission in any slot by only one tag. • There is no identification problem. System Model (cont.)

13. The estimator performance is measured in terms of the number of slots needed to perform the estimation to the desired accuracy level. • The goal is to achieve the desired performance in as little time as possible. • In other words, if it takes le slots to compute ˆt, the estimate of t tags with a certain accuracy, and li slots to uniquely identify ˆt tags, then, we need se.le < li.si, where se and si are the sizes of the bit strings transmitted during the estimation and identification phases respectively. System Model (cont.)

14. Phillips I-Code system. • A frame size f (typically a power of 2) is sent by the readers along with a seed value which is 16-bit number. • The seed information along with its identifier used by the tag to hash into an integer in the range [1, f], which specifies the slot in which the frame will contend. System Model (cont.)

15. Model that is approached: • Extend the scheme to support variable contention probability p. • Therefore, the reader now sends three parameters in each probe: • the seed • the frame size f • the integer [f/p] • The tag hashes the combined seed/identifier value into the range [1, [f/p]]. • If the hashed value is greater than f, then the tag does not transmit in this frame, else it transmit in the computed slot. • Therefore, a frame transmission probability of f/(f/p) = p. System Model (cont.)

16. The reader probes the tags with the frame size f • The tags pick a slot j in the frame uniformly at random and transmit in that slot. • The indicator random variable Xjis used to determine whether tag transmit to and not transmit to in slot j. • Xj = 1 if no tag transmit in slot j, referred as an empty slot, and Xj= 0 otherwise. • Similarly, we set Yj = 1 if and only if there is exactly one tag that transmits in slot j, referred as a singleton slot, and Vj = 1 if and only if there are multiple tags that transmit in slot j, referred as a collision. • So that, Xj + Yj + Vj = 1 for all slots j. Deterministic Algorithm

17. Let N0 = ∑ Xj from j = 1 to j = f denote the total number of empty slots. • N1 = ∑ Yj from j = 1 to j = f denote the total number of singleton slots. • Nc= f − N0− N1 denote the number of collision slots. • P = t/f, t denotes numbers of tags and f denotes frame size. Deterministic Algorithm (cont.)

18. Deterministic Algorithm (cont.)

19. Deterministic Algorithm (cont.) • Zero Estimator (ZE) ρ<1, many empty slots and few singleton and collision slots • Collision Estimator (CE) ρ>1, many collision slots and singleton • slots decrease • Singleton Estimator (SE) ρ=1

20. Deterministic Algorithm (cont.)

21. ρ<1 ZE gets more accurate results than CE • CE performs better when ρ greater than a • threshold Deterministic Algorithm (cont.)

22. Compute the desired variance σ Initial frame size f Energize the tags and get n0 and nc Compute (1) get fz if fz >fmax then set fz = fmax and ρ=t’/fmax and set repetition number Let fc = ρ=t’*1.15. if fc >fmax then set fc=fmax. and set repetition number Select the littler one between fc and fz Deterministic Algorithm (cont.)

23. Large number of slots needed for the desired accuracy • The estimation time is faster than the identification time within an accuracy. 50 000 tags within an confidence interval of ±500 tags in 4 .5 seconds. Deterministic Algorithm (cont.)

24. Probabilistic Algorithm (cont.)

25. Probabilistic Algorithm (cont.)

26. Probabilistic Algorithm (cont.)