1 / 9

Patterns of Reducability

Patterns of Reducability. Turing computable functions. A function *  * is a computable function if some Turing Machine M, in every input w, halts with just f(w) on its tape. Polynomial time function.

gale
Télécharger la présentation

Patterns of Reducability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Patterns of Reducability

  2. Turing computable functions • A function *  * is a computable function if some Turing Machine M, in every input w, halts with just f(w) on its tape.

  3. Polynomial time function • A function f: *  * is a polynomial time computable function if some polynomial time TM, M, exists that halts with just F(w) on its tape, when started on any input w.

  4. Mapping reducability • A language A is mapping reducable to language B, written A ≤m B, if there is a computable function f : *  * , where for every w  *, w  A  F(w)  B

  5. Polynomial time reducability • A language, A, is polynomial time mapping reducible (or simply polynomial time reducible) to a language, B, written A ≤p B ,if a polynomial time computable function f: : *  * exists, where for every w, w  A  f(w)  B • The function f is called the polynomial time reduction of A to B

  6. Decidability Theorems • A ≤m B and B is decidable then A is decidable • A ≤m B and A is undecidable, then B is undecidable

  7. Recognizability Theorems • A ≤m B and B is Turing recognizable then A is Turing recognizable • A ≤m B and A is not Turing recognizable then B is not Turing recognizable • Typically we let A be ATMthe complement of ATM

  8. Definition • A language B is NP-complete if it satisfies 2 conditions • B is n NP, and • Every A in NP is polynomial time reducable to B Forall A  NP . A ≤p B

  9. P or NP-complete Theorems • To show a language is in P • A ≤p B and BP then AP • To Show a language is NP-complete • If B is NP-complete and B ≤p C, for C  NP, then C in NP-complete • The most common “B” is the language booleansatifiability

More Related