1 / 42

Asymptotically good binary code with efficient encoding & Justesen code

Asymptotically good binary code with efficient encoding & Justesen code. Tomer Levinboim Error Correcting Codes Seminar (2008). Outline. Intro codes Singleton Bound Linear Codes Bounds Gilbert-Varshamov Hamming RS codes Code Concatention Examples Wozencraft Ensemble Justesen Codes.

Télécharger la présentation

Asymptotically good binary code with efficient encoding & Justesen code

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Asymptotically good binary code with efficient encoding& Justesen code Tomer Levinboim Error Correcting Codes Seminar (2008)

  2. Outline • Intro • codes • Singleton Bound • Linear Codes • Bounds • Gilbert-Varshamov • Hamming • RS codes • Code Concatention • Examples • Wozencraft Ensemble • Justesen Codes

  3. Hamming Distance • Hamming Distance between • The Hamming Distance is a metric • Non negative • Symmetric • Triangle inequality =

  4. Weight • The weight (wt) of • Example (on board)

  5. Code • An (n,k,d)q code C is a function such that: • For every

  6. Code (parameters) • (n,k,d)q • Parameters • n – block length • k – information length • d – minimum distance (actually, a lower bound) • q – size of alphabet • |C| = qk or k=logq|C|

  7. Code (parameters div n) • Asymptotic view of parameters as n∞: • The rate • Relative minimum distance • Thus an (n,k,d)q can be written as (1,R,δ)q • Notation: (n,k,d)q vs. [n,k,d]q – latter reserved for linear code (soon)

  8. Trivial Code Example • FEC3 = write each bit three time • R = ? • d = ? • how many errors can we • Detect ? (d-1) • Correct ? t, where d=2t+1

  9. Goal • Would like to: • Maximize δ – correct more • Maximize R – send more information * conflicting goals - would like to be able to construct an [n,k,d]q code s.t. δ>0, R>0 and both are constant. • Minimize q – for practical reasons • Maximize number of codewords while minimizing n and keeping d large.

  10. Singleton Bound • Let C be an [n,k,d]q code then • k ≤ n – d + 1 equivalently • R ≤ 1 – δ + o(1) • Proof: project C to first k-1 coordinates • On Board

  11. Visual intuition • On board... • Ballq(x,r) • r:=d • r:=t (where d=2t+1) • Volq(n,r) = |Ballq(x,r)|

  12. Linear Codes

  13. Linear Codes • An [n,k,d]q code C:FqKFqn is linear when: • Fq is a field • C is linear function (e.g., matrix) • Linearity implies: • C(ax+by) = aC(x) + bC(y) • 0n member of C

  14. Linear Codes (example) • FEC3 • [3,1,3]2 • Hadamard – longest linear code • [n,logn, n/2]2 • e.g., - [8,3,4]2 • (H - Matrix representation on board) • Dimensions • Asymptotic behavior

  15. Linear Codes – minimum distance • Lemma: if C:FqKFqn is linear then Note: for clarity Cx means C(x) • Proof: • ≤ - trivial • ≥ - follows from linearity (on board)

  16. Reed-Solomon code • Idea: oversample a polynomial • Let q be prime power and Fq a finite field of size q. • Let k<n and fix n elements of Fq, • x1,x2,..xn • Given a message m=(c0..ck-1) interpret it has the coefficients of the polynomial p

  17. RS Codes • Thus (c0..ck-1) is mapped to (p(x1),..p(xn)) • Linear mapping (Vandermonde) • Using linearity, can show for x≠0  RS meet the Singleton bound • Proof: on board • (# of roots of a k-1 degree poly) • Encoding time

  18. Bounds

  19. Gilbert-Varshamov Bound Preliminaries • Binary Entropy • Stirling Implying that:

  20. Gilbert-Varshamov Bound Preliminaries • Using the binary entropy we obtain • On board

  21. Gilbert-Varshamov Boundbound statement • For every n and d<n/2 there is an (n,k,d)q (not necessarily linear) code such that: • In terms of rate and relative min-distance:

  22. Gilbert-Varshamov Bound Proof • On Board • Sketch of proof: • if C is maximal then: • And • Now use union bound and entropy to obtain result (we show for q=2, using binary entropy)

  23. GV-Bound • Gilbert proved this with a greedy construction • Varshamov proved for linear codes • proved using random generator matrices – most matrices are good error correcting codes

  24. Singleton / GV Plot 1 Singleton (upper) Gilbert-Varshamov (lower) 0.5 1

  25. Hamming Bound (Upper) • With similar reasoning to GV bound but using • For q=2 can show that

  26. Bounds plot *Madhu Sudan (Lecture 5, 2001)

  27. Code Concatenation

  28. Code Concatenation - Motivation • RS codes imply we can construct good [n,k,d]q codes for any q=pk • Practically would like to work with small q (2, 28) • Consider the “obvious” idea for binary code generated from C – simply convert each symbol from Σn to log2q, • What’s the problem with this approach ? (write the new code!)

  29. Code Concatenation • Due to Forney (1966) • Two codes: • Outer: Cout = [N,K,D]Q • Inner: Cin = [n,k,d]q • Inner code should encode each symbol of outer code  k = logqQ

  30. Code Concatenation • How does it work ? * Luca Trevisan (Lecture 2)

  31. Code Concatenation • What is the new code ? • dcon = dD Proof: • On board

  32. Code Concatenation (Examples) • Asymptotically • δ = ¼  • R=logn/2n  0 

  33. Good Codes • Can we “explicitly” build asymptotically good (linear) codes ? • asymptotically good = constant R, δ> 0 as n∞ • Explicit = polytime constructable / logspace constructible

  34. Asymptotically Good Codes

  35. Asymptotically Good Codes • GV tells us that most linear functions of a certain size are good error-correcting codes • Can find a good code in brute-force • Use brute force on inner-code, where the alphabet is exponentially smaller! • Do we really need to search ?

  36. Wozencraft Ensemble • Consider the following set of codes: such that (R=1/2) ( • Notice that (on board)

  37. Wozencraft Ensemble • Lemma: There exists an ensemble of codes c1,..cN of rate ½ where N = qk-1 such that for at least (1-ε)N value of i, the code Ci has distance dis.t. • Proof (on board), outline: • Different codes have only 0n in common • Let y=Cα(x), then, If wt(y)<d  y in Ball(0n, d)  there are at most Vol(n,d) “bad” codes • For large enough n=2k, we have Vol(n,d) ≤ εN

  38. Wozencraft Ensemble • Implications: • Can construct entire ensemble in O(2k)=O(2n) • There are many such good codes, but which one do we use ?

  39. Justesen Code • Concatenation of: • Cout - RS code over • a set of inner codes • Justesen Code: C* = Cout(C1, C2, .. CN) • Each symbol of Cout is encoded using a different inner code Cj • If RS has rate R C* has rate R/2

  40. Justesen Code - δ • Denote the outer RS code [N,K,D]Q • Claim: C* has relative distance

  41. Justesen Code Proof • Intuition: like regular concatenation, but εN bad codes. • for x≠y, the outer code induces S={j | xj≠yj}, • |S| ≥D • There are at most εN j’s such that Cj is bad and therefore at least |S|- εN ≥ D- εN ≥ (1-R- ε)N good codes • since RS implies D=N-(K-1) • Each good code has relative distance ≥ d • d* ≥ (1-R- ε)Nd

  42. Justesen Code • The concatenated code C* is an asymptotically good code and has a “super” explicit construction • Can take q=2 to get such a binary code

More Related