1 / 33

X-43A Flights 2 and 3 Overview

X-43A Flights 2 and 3 Overview. Luat T. Nguyen NASA Langley Research Center Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah March 3, 2005. Background. Air-Breathing Launch Systems Are More Efficient.

garima
Télécharger la présentation

X-43A Flights 2 and 3 Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. X-43A Flights 2 and 3 Overview Luat T. NguyenNASA Langley Research CenterAerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee MeetingSalt Lake City, UtahMarch 3, 2005

  2. Background Air-Breathing Launch Systems Are More Efficient Air-Breathing Systems Possess Significantly Higher Propulsive Efficiency Hydrogen Fuel Hydrocarbon Fuels Turbojets Rocket Rocket Based Combined Cycle Specific Impulse Turbine Based Combined Cycle Ramjets Scramjets Turbojets Ramjets Scramjets Rockets 0 10 20 MACH NUMBER

  3. Goals/Objectives ofHyper-X Program GOALS: Demonstrate, validate and advance the technology, experimental techniques, and computational methods and tools for design and performance predictions of a hypersonic aircraft powered with an airframe-integrated, scramjet engine. FLIGHT OBJECTIVES: - Three flights: two @ Mach 7 and one Mach 10 - Methods verification - Scaling confirmation Primary Metric: Accelerate Comparison of Ground & Flight Data • TECHNOLOGY • OBJECTIVES: • - Vehicle design & risk reduction • - Flight validation of design methods • Design method enhancement • Hyper-X Phase 2 and beyond Wind Tunnel-to- Wind Tunnel Comparison

  4. X-43 Vehicle Geometry 148" 60" Length: 12'4" (3.7 meters) Width: 5'0" (1.5 meters) Height:: 2'2" (0.6 meters) Weight: 3000 lb max 19" 26" 30" 144"

  5. Approach and Methodology X-43 Vehicle 1 Rudder H2O Fads PPTs Controller N2 Actuator Battery FMU H2 SiH4 Wing

  6. Approach and Methodology Hyper-X Research Vehicle Key Mission Events

  7. B-52 and X-43 Ground Track

  8. X-43 Mach 7 Flight 1 Trajectory

  9. First Flight MishapJune 2, 2001 • Nominal flight to launch point • Drop of booster stack and ignition at 5 seconds after drop nominal • At ~13 seconds after drop booster departed controlled flight -- right fin broke off, followed, within one second, by left fin and rudder • Wing broke off at 15 seconds • Booster data stream lost at 21 seconds • At 48.5 seconds, FTS initiated by Navy Range Safety Officer while booster was within cleared corridor – no hazard to civilians on ground or air crews • X-43 data stream lost at 77.5 seconds

  10. Mishap Description ORIG_F1.avi

  11. MIB Findings • Modeling deficiencies causing over-prediction of autopilot stability margins • Fin Actuation System • Aerodynamics • Mass/Geometry Characteristics • Over-prediction of fin actuator torque margin • Misprediction of aerodynamic hinge moments • Other areas for improvement • Validation/Cross Checking/Reviews • Documentation • Workforce

  12. X-43A RTF Risk ReductionMajor Actions Launch Vehicle Stage Separation Research Vehicle • Higher fidelity models • Aerodynamics • Actuators • Structures • Autopilot • Actuator upgrade for greater torque capability • Lower loads trajectory: booster propellant off-load • Autopilot trades/optimization • Independent simulation • Higher fidelity models • Increased AOA for flameout robustness and greater thrust • Upgraded engine control logic for unstart robustness • Adapter fluid systems improvements • Redesign of wing control horns • Aircraft-in-the-loop timing tests • Independent simulation • Higher fidelity models • Additional separation mechanism testing • Control law refinements for robustness • Independent simulation

  13. RTF AerodynamicDatabase Enhancement

  14. X-43A Flight #1 Profile vs. Pegasus Pegasus X-43A Flt. #1 2000 1600 q psf 1200 6/01 Mishap 800 400 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Mach

  15. Booster Modification • Approximately 3,345 lbs of propellant removed

  16. Propellant Off-Load Halfway through Machining Machining Completed

  17. X-43A Flight Profiles vs. Pegasus Pegasus X-43A Flt. #1 X-43A Flt. #2 2000 1600 q psf 1200 6/01 Mishap 800 400 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Mach

  18. Fin Actuation System Upgrade • Objective: To increase the FAS hinge torque capability from 1850 ft-lbs to 3000+ ft-lbs • Modifications: • Add second motor in torque summing arrangement • Fabricate new gears to handle higher loads • Change housing material from aluminum to stainless steel • Add two additional batteries • Redesign the power and pre-driver boards in the ECU Electronic Control Unit (ECU) Actuator

  19. Ejector Piston Force Tail Surface Deflection Stage Separation Aerodynamics • Independent time accurate, N-S CFD w/ coupled 3DOF trajectory simulation performed by CFD Research Corp. as part of RTF risk reduction • Results indicate excellent agreement with NASA SepSim tool and CFD results • Coupled time accurate simulation predicts clean, controlled separation (no re-contact) trajectory

  20. Scramjet Unstart Prevention:Durascram • Unstart occurs when pressure from combustion causes isolator shock train to propagate forward into the inlet causing massive flow spillage • Actively controlling fuel flow via isolator pressure feedback (Durascram) to enhance unstart robustness

  21. Flight Simulations Boost Separation Research Flight NRTSim (Orbital) • Full Stack sim up to separation • Pegasus heritage • LV analysis, autopilot design, trajectory analysis SepSim (Langley) • 6+6 DOF sim of LV & RV during separation • Built on MSC/ADAMS code • Sep analysis, sensitivity studies, collision detection RVSim (Dryden) • RV flight from post separation to splash • Dryden sim environment • RV analysis, autopilot design, sensitivity studies Primary Drop-to-Splash (Dryden) • Full mission simulation • NRTSim + StepSim + RVSim • Manual linking of sims • Validation of individual sim phases/integrated flight LVSim-D (Dryden) • Independent LV sim • Dryden sim environment • Independent LV analysis Post 2 Sep (Langley) • 6+6 DOF sep simulation • Built on POST2 code • Independent Sep analysis Back-Up End-to-End Sim (Langley) • Full mission simulation • NRTSim + SepSim + RVSim • Single user interface, automated linking/integration • Validation of Drop-to-Splash & individual sims

  22. X-43A Flight 2March 27, 2004

  23. hyper-x_second_flight .avi

  24. Flight Objectives Met:High Quality Vehicle and Engine Data Obtained – Provides Basis for Extensive Analysis and Research Thrust predicted to ~3% Mach 7 Flight

  25. Mach 7 Thermal ResultsComparison with Flight Data

  26. X-43 Free Flight

  27. Alpha Comparisons Mach Comparisons  M Time, sec Time, sec Engine Cowl HeatingParameter Comparisons Engine Cowl Heating Parameter Comparisons Dynamic Pressure Comparisons q (lb/ft2) HeatingParameter (Btu/ft2sec) Time, sec Time, sec Flight 3 / Flight 2 Boost Comparison

  28. Flight 3 Hardware Configuration Fillet Assembly - Localized Reinforcement - Revised Attachment Method - Upgraded Pegasus TPS - Additional structural composite plies Wing Assembly - Standard Pegasus - Upgraded LE TPS - Additional themocouples on the right side FAS - Dual Motors - Gear train - Electronics/Batteries - Through-bolted actuator mount Bulkhead Mounted Avionics - HXLV Specific Ballast Assembly - Adjusted for Mach 10 trajectory NOZZLE - Upgraded TPS Orion 50S Rocket Motor - Upgraded Pegasus TPS - No propellant offload X-43 - Upgraded LE TPS AFT Skirt Assembly - Aluminum - Upgraded TPS on Fins LE - Standard Pegasus Fins Ballast/Avionics Module - Aluminum Hyper-X Adapter - Strengthened panels, GN2 mod - Aluminum

  29. X-43A Mission DetailsFlight 3 versus Flight 2 MACH 9.6 (3 sec) NONE 110,000 ft -0.5g’s (3 sec) 2.5g’s

  30. X-43A/Booster Separationat M=9.7, h=109k feet

  31. X-43A Flight #3 Data 31

  32. X-43A Demonstrated Propulsive Efficiency Required for Future Launch SystemsSafe, Flexible, Affordable Airframe Integrated Turbojets X-43 scaled I sp Ramjets Scramjets Rockets 0 10 20 MACH NUMBER

  33. X-43 2004 Flight Summary • All program objectives were met • A wealth of high quality flight data substantiateshypersonic vehicle and engine design tools and scalingmethodologies • Stability and control, aerodynamics, boundary layer transition,vehicle structure, TPS, and internal environment performedas predicted • Proved in flight that an airframe-integrated scramjetworks well - engine performance was very close topreflight predictions • X-43 accelerated at Mach 6.83 • X-43 cruised at Mach 9.68, the design condition • Proved that non-symmetrical high q/high Mach stage separation is very doable, leading the way to future safe staged launch systems • Paved the way for future systems • Why were we successful? • Exceptional teamwork across multiple government and industry organizations • Thorough understanding of what we wanted to do and how we were doing it from an integrated systems perspective • Rigorous processes for design, development, testing, and checking

More Related