1 / 44

Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in STAR: Current Results and Future Prospects

Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in STAR: Current Results and Future Prospects. Spencer Klein, LBNL (for the STAR Collaboration). What are ultra-peripheral collisions? Impact Parameter tagging and multiple interactions STAR r 0 Results at 130 GeV/nucleon:

garyalbert
Télécharger la présentation

Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in STAR: Current Results and Future Prospects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in STAR: Current Results and Future Prospects Spencer Klein, LBNL (for the STAR Collaboration) What are ultra-peripheral collisions? Impact Parameter tagging and multiple interactions STAR r0Results at 130 GeV/nucleon: Preliminary r0 and e+e- Results from 200 GeV UPC Future Prospects Conclusions

  2. Au g, P, or meson Au Coupling ~ nuclear form factor Coherent Interactions • b > 2RA; • no hadronic interactions • <b> ~ 20-60 fermi at RHIC • Ions are sources of fields • photons • Z2 • Pomerons or mesons (mostly f0) • A 2 (bulk)A 4/3 (surface) • Fields couple coherently to ions • Photon/Pomeron wavelength l = h/p> RA • amplitudes add with same phase • P < h/RA, ~30 MeV/c for heavy ions • P|| < gh/RA ~ 3 GeV/c at RHIC • Strong couplings --> large cross sections

  3. Unique Features of Ultra-peripheral collisions • Very strong electromagnetic fields • g --> e+e- and g --> qq • Multiple production • Coherent Decays • Unique Geometry • 2-source interferometer • Nuclear Environment • Particle Production with capture • Large s for e-

  4. VM g Production occurs in/near one ion Specific Channels • Vector meson production gA -- > ’ r0, w, f, J/y,… A • Production cross sections --> s(VN) • Vector meson spectroscopy (r*, w*, f*,…) • Wave function collapse • Multiple Vector Meson Production & Decay • Electromagnetic particle production gg -- > leptons,mesons • Strong Field (nonperturbative?) QED • Za ~ 0.6 • meson spectroscopy Ggg • Ggg ~ charge content of scalar/tensor mesons • Ggg is small for glueballs e+e-, qq,... gs Za ~ 0.6; is Ng > 1?

  5. Au g qq Au r0 Exclusive r0 Production • One nucleus emits a photon • Weizsacker-Williams flux • The photon fluctuates to a qq pair • The pair scatters elastically from the other nucleus • qq pair emerges as a vector meson • s(r) ~ 590 mb; 8 % of sAuAu(had.) at 200 GeV/nucleon • 120 Hz production rate at RHIC design luminosity • RHIC r, w, f, r* rates all > 5 Hz • J/y , Y’, f*, w*, copiously produced, U a challenge • The LHC is a vector meson factory • s(r) ~ 5.2 b; 65% of sPbPb (had.) • 230 kHz r0 production rate with calcium

  6. RHIC - Au HERA data + Glauber Klein & Nystrand, 1999 HERA param. Elastic Scattering with Soft Pomerons • Glauber Calculation • parameterized HERA data • Pomeron + meson exchange • all nucleons are the same • s ~ A2 (weak scatter limit) • All nucleons participate • J/y • s ~ A 4/3 (strong scatter limit) • Surface nucleons participate • Interior cancels (interferes) out • s ~ A 5/3 (r0) • depends on s(Vp) • sensitive to shadowing? Y = 1/2 ln(2k/MV)

  7. Shadowing & Hard Pomerons RHIC - Au • If pomerons are 2-gluon ladders • P shadowing ~ (gluon shadowing)2 • Valid for cc or bb • ds/dy & s depend on gluon distributions • reduces mid-rapidity ds/dy • Suppression grows with energy • s reduced ~ 50% at the LHC • colored glass condensates may have even bigger effect • high density phase of gluonic matter No shadowing HERA param. ds/dy Leading Twist Calculation Frankfurt, Strikman & Zhalov, 2001 Shadowed Y = 1/2 ln(2k/MV)

  8. Au* Au g g(1+) r0 P Au Au* Multiple Interactions • Za ~ 0.6 • Ng >1 quite likely • Multiple Interactions • Photon emission is independent • S. N. Gupta (1950) • (Mostly) different interactions factorize

  9. Au* Au g g(1+) r0 P Au Au* Nuclear Excitation • Nuclear excitation ‘tag’s small b • Multiple photon exchange • Mutual excitation • Au* decay via neutron emission • simple, unbiased trigger • Multiple Interactions probable • P(r0, b=2R) ~ 1% at RHIC • P(2EXC, b=2R) ~ 30% • Non-factorizable diagrams are small for AA

  10. r0 with Gold @ RHIC P(b) b [fm] Photonuclear Interaction Probabilities & ds/dy r0 with gold @ RHIC • Excitation + r0 changes b distribution • alters photon spectrum • low <b> --> high <k> ds/dy y Exclusive - solid X10 for XnXn - dashed X100 for 1n1n - dotted Baltz, Klein & Nystrand (2002)

  11. gg with nuclear breakup dN/dy for f2(1270) gold at RHIC XnXn breakup • Impact parameter tagging similar for gg • f2(1270) cross sections • Breakup non-negligible • Tagging is less dramatic than for photoproduction • s(XnXn), s(1n1n)/s(tot) smaller • rapdity distributions less different Rapidity no breakup

  12. gg --> m+m- w / nuclear breakup gg --> m+m- gold at RHIC • Smaller <b> • harder photon spectrum • harder Mmm spectrum • s(XnXn), s(1n1n)/s(tot) ratio smaller than f2(1270) • smaller avg. mass XnXn nobreak XnXn breakup Mmm(GeV)

  13. + r - Polarized Photons • Electric fields parallel to b • photon linear polarization follows b • not spin • Use 1 reaction to determine the polarization, to study a 2nd reaction • Correlated Decay angles • Use r0 -- > p+p- as ‘analyzer • p+p- plane tends to parallel photon pol. • Study VM production angles, single spin asymmetries in gA, etc. b,E (transverse view)

  14. + b,E r - (transverse view) Polarized Photons • Electric fields parallel to b • photon polarization follows b • Use 1 reaction to determine the polarization, to study a 2nd reaction • Correlated Decay angles • Use r0 -- > p+p- as ‘analyzer • p+p- decay plane often parallels photon pol. • reasonable analyzing power • Study VM production angles, single spin gA asymmetries, etc.

  15. Interference • 2 indistinguishable possibilities • Interference!! • Similar to pp bremsstrahlung • no dipole moment, so • no dipole radiation • 2-source interferometer • separation b • r,w, f, J/y are JPC = 1- - • Amplitudes have opposite signs • s ~ |A1 - A2eip·b|2 • b is unknown • For pT << 1/<b> • destructive interference No Interference Interference y=0 r0 -->p+p- pT (GeV/c)

  16. e+ J/Y e- + b J/Y + - (transverse view) Entangled Waveforms • VM are short lived • decay before traveling distance b • Decay points are separated in space-time • no interference • OR • the wave functions retain amplitudes for all possible decays, long after the decay occurs • Non-local wave function • non-factorizable: Yp+ p- Yp+Yp- • Example of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

  17. Interference and Nuclear Excitation • Smaller <b> --> interference at higher <pT> r0 prod at RHIC J/Y prod at the LHC Solid - no breakup criteria Dashed lines 1n1n and XnXn breakup

  18. Multiple meson production Production with gold at RHIC • P(r0) ~ 1% at b=2RA • w/ Poisson distribution • P(r0r0) ~ (1%)2/2 at b=2RA • ~ 106r0r0 /year • Enhancement (ala HBT) for production from same ion (away from y=0) • Vector meson superradiance • toward a vector meson laser • Dp < h/RA • Like production coherence • Large fraction of pairs • Stimulated decays? P(b) b (fermi)

  19. + + r r - - Angular Correlations in r0r0 • r0 polarization follows the photon • r0r0 should have parallel polarization • p+p- planes should be highly correlated b,E (transverse view)

  20. r0 Analysis • Exclusive Channels • r0 and nothing else • 2 charged particles • net charge 0 • Coherent Coupling • SpT < 2h/RA ~100 MeV/c • back to back in transverse plane • Backgrounds: • incoherent photonuclear interactions • grazing nuclear collisions • beam gas interactions • upstream interactions • out-of-time events

  21. Triggering Strategies • Triggering is the hardest part of studying UPCs!! • Ultra-peripheral final states • 1-6 charged particles • low pT • rapidity gaps • small b events • ‘tagged’ by nuclear breakup

  22. Peripheral Trigger & Data Collection • Level 0 • hits in opposing CTB quadrants • Rate 20-40 /sec • Level 3 (online reconstruction) • vertex position, multiplicity • Rate 1-2 /sec • 2000 prototype • 9 hours of data -> 30,000 events • 2001 early production • few weeks -> 1.5M events

  23. Exclusive r0 Signal region: pT<0.15 GeV • 2 tracks in interaction region • vertex in diamond • reject cosmic rays • non-coplanar; q< 3 rad • peak for pT < 150 MeV/c • p+p+ andp-p- give background shape • p+p- pairs from higher multiplicity events have similar shape • scaled up by 2.1 • high pTr0 ? • asymmetric Mpp peak r0 PT M(p+p-)

  24. ‘Minimum Bias’ Dataset Signal region: pT<0.15 GeV • Trigger on neutron signals in both ZDCs • ~800,000 triggers • Event selection same as peripheral • p+p+ andp-p- model background • single (1n) and multiple (Xn) neutron production • Coulomb excitation • Giant Dipole Resonance • Xn may include hadronic interactions? • Measure s(1n1n) & s(XnXn) r0 PT ZDC Energy (arbitrary units)

  25. p- p- r0 p+ p+ g g gA -- > p+p- A gA -- > r0A -- > p+p- A Direct p+p- production • The two processes interfere • 1800 phase shift at M(r0) • changes p+p- lineshape • good data with gp (HERA + fixed target) • p+p- : r0 ratio should depend on s(pA):s(rA) • decrease as A rises?

  26. r0 lineshape ZEUS gp --> (r0 + p+p- )p STAR gAu --> (r0 + p+p- )Au* ds/dMpp (mb/GeV) ds/dMpp (mb/GeV) Preliminary Mpp Mpp Fit to r0 Breit-Wigner + p+p- Modified Soding approach Interference is significant p+p- fraction is comparable to ZEUS e+e- and hadronic backgrounds Many other fits are possible

  27. Nucl.Breakup dN/dy for r0(XnXn) Soft Pomeron, no-shadowing, XnXn • r ds/dy are different with and without breakup • XnXn data matches simulation • Extrapolate to insensitive region After detector simulation

  28. Cross Section Comparison Baltz, Klein & Nystrand (1999/2002) • Normalized to 7.2 b hadronic cross section • Systematic uncertainties: luminosity, overlapping events, vertex & tracking simulations, single neutron selection, etc. • Exclusive r0 bootstrapped from XnXn • limited by statistics for XnXn in topology trigger • Frankfurt, Strikman & Zhalov predict ~ 50% higher cross sections • Good agreement • factorization works

  29. 200 GeV/nucleon higher cross sections much higher luminosity ‘Production’ triggers Minimum Bias data: 10X statistics Topology Data ~20X statistics Higher STAR B field 0.5 T (2001) vs. 0.25 T (2000) lower acceptance for low pT particles shorter interaction region sz ~ 25 cm Physics precision r0 lineshape, pT spectra and helicity distribution s(e+e-) and theory comparison 4-prong events (r*(1450/1700)?) The 2001 data

  30. Minimum Bias r0 at 200 GeV • ~ 70% of minimum bias data processed so far • ~ 1.7 million triggers • higher purity than 2000 • Analysis same as for 2000 data r0 PT r0 PT ZDC Energy (arbitrary units)

  31. Minimum Bias r0 at 200 GeV Rapidity Mpp (GeV)

  32. 200 GeVExclusive r0 Signal region: pT<0.15 GeV • Almost same analysis as 130 GeV • smaller interaction diamond • 1.5 million triggers • improved trigger --> higher efficiency • B=0.5T increases trigger threshold • fewer low Mpp pairs • still under investigation • Same modified Mpp Soding fit r0 PT Preliminary M(p+p-)

  33. gg --> e+e- red - e+ e- pairs p e • ‘Minimum bias trigger • 200 GeV • B=0.25T • small fraction of data • Select electrons by dE/dx • in region p< 140 MeV/c • Select identified pairs • pT peaked at 1/<b> • Different from photoproduced pp Preliminary P (GeV/c) Events ee pp Pair Pt (GeVc)

  34. STAR Near Future possibilities • VM interference measurements • 2-prong meson decays • r0 at higher pT • J/Y (needs more data) • wider r0 rapidity distribution (using FTPCs) • 4-prong meson spectroscopy • r*0 • r0r0

  35. Future Possibilities: RHIC + LHC • Criteria: • Interesting Physics • At least vaguely experimentally realizable • More multiple vector meson production • correlated decays? • Photoproduction of open charm/bottom/top • Pair production with capture • pp diffraction: meson spectroscopy and hard diffraction

  36. Photoproduction of Open Quarks QQ--> open c,b g • gA --> ccX, bbX • sensitive to gluon structure function. • Higher order corrections problematic • Ratio s(gA)/s(gp) --> shadowing • removes most QCD uncertainties • max ~10% at RHIC, ~ 20% at LHC • Experimentally feasible (?) • high rates • known isolation techniques • Physics backgrounds are gg--> cc, gg --> cc • gg cross section is small • gg background appears controllableby requiring a rapidity gap g Production occurs in one ion Klein, Nystrand & Vogt, 2002

  37. e- gs e+ Electron Production w/ Capture • gg -- > e+e- • Electron is bound to nucleus • Probe of atomic physics • non-perturbative • s uncertain, ~ 100-200 barns • Focused +78Au beam • RHIC Rate ~ 10,000 particles/sec • beam ~ 40-80 mW • easy to measure • LHC rate ~ 1M particles/sec • beam ~ 10-40 W • can quench superconducting magnets • limits LHC luminosity w/ Pb • Could extract as external beam Za ~ 0.6; is Ng > 1? Klein,2001

  38. pp Diffraction p • Mostly double-Pomeron interactions • at SPS significant Reggeon component • use Roman pots to measure momentum transfer from diffracted protons Pomerons p Coupling ~ nuclear form factor

  39. Meson spectroscopy with pp • CERN WA91…/102 discovered ‘pt filter’ • meson type depends on momentum transfers • low dpt selects exotics (non qq) • at RHIC • much smaller Reggeon component • polarized beams • study spin structure of Pomeron & meson production • very little theoretical guidance

  40. Hard diffraction at RHIC • Study jets, W,Z production ala CDF • CDF, D0 find s(D)/s(ND) ~ 0.01 • good rates • polarized beams • spin structure of Pomeron • probe quark content (for W,Z) • compare pp vs. pp

  41. Physics Recap • RHIC is a high luminosity gg and gA collider • The strong fields and 2-source geometry allow many unique studies • Coherent events have distinctive kinematics • Ultra-peripheral collisions allow for many studies • Measurement of s(VA) • Vector meson spectroscopy • A measurement of the r0 pT spectrum can test if particle decay triggers wave function collapse • multiple vector meson production • Tests of strong field QED • Studies of charge content of glueball candidates

  42. Conclusions • STAR has observed three peripheral collisions processes • Au + Au -- > Au + Au + r0 • Au + Au -- > Au* + Au* + r0 • Au + Au -- > Au* + Au* + e+e- • The cross sections for r0 production are in agreement with theoretical models • Interference between r0 and direct p+p- is seen • Ultra-peripheral collisions is in it’s infancy • It works!!! • We’re learning a lot about techniques • come back next year for many more results!

More Related