1 / 25

Jonathan Fryer, MD, Jeff Fronza , MD, Jeff Wayne, MD,

Surgical Residents’ Perception of Competence & Relevance of the Clinical Curriculum to Future Practice. Jonathan Fryer, MD, Jeff Fronza , MD, Jeff Wayne, MD, Debra DaRosa, PhD, and Jay Prystowsky, MD, MHPE Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Graduation Requirements?*.

gaston
Télécharger la présentation

Jonathan Fryer, MD, Jeff Fronza , MD, Jeff Wayne, MD,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Surgical Residents’ Perception of Competence & Relevance of the Clinical Curriculum to Future Practice Jonathan Fryer, MD, Jeff Fronza, MD, Jeff Wayne, MD, Debra DaRosa, PhD, and Jay Prystowsky, MD, MHPE Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

  2. Graduation Requirements?* • A = “essential” • B = “should be” • C = “not necessary” 121 operations = “essential” components of GS resident training by majority of PD’s (n=114/254) • *R.H. Bell, Surgical council on resident education: a new organization devoted to graduate surgical education, J Am Coll Surg204 (2007), pp. 341–346.

  3. But…… For 52% (63/121) of the “essential” cases, the mode no. of cases/resident = 0! These included cases such as: CBDE Transanal tumor excision Anal fistulotomy

  4. Research Questions • To what extent do our graduates feel competent with selected operations? • How relevant are these operations to their current practices? • Is there a relationship between the number of cases logged and post residency perceived competence?

  5. Subjects

  6. Survey Instrument = 67 Operations

  7. Survey Instrument Each operation= two 4-point scales SA A D SD “I was well-prepared to work-up, independently perform this operation, and effectively care for the patient post-operatively” (i.e. COMPETENCE) “This operation is relevant to my current practice profile” (i.e. RELEVANCE)

  8. Data Collection Annual electronic survey sent out in January to all general surgery residents graduating the previous year. Case logs were reviewed for each resident compiling total case volume by operations listed on the survey.

  9. Statistical analysis • Frequency counts and means were calculated for both survey scales for eachoperation. • Linear regression analysis - correlation between perceptions of competence and total major procedural case volumes. • Unpaired Student-T-tests - compared mean case #s for eachprocedure performed by residents’ who felt competent(SA+A) vs. those performed by those who did not feel competent (D+SD).

  10. Results

  11. Least Relevant Operations Major amputation Endovascular repair of AAA Infrainguinal arterial bypass Debridement of eschar • Procedure for NEC • Orchiopexy • CEA • Creation of dialysis access fistula

  12. Most Relevant Operations • Exploratory laparotomy with LOA • Open chole • Lap chole • Ventral hernia repair • Partial gastrectomy • Enterectomy w/ anastomosis • Colectomy, partial w/ anastomosis • Colectomy, partial w/ coloproctostomy • G-tube or J-tube inserts

  13. Highest Competence G-tube/J-tube insertion Partial gastrectomy Wedge resection of liver Needle breast bx Simple mastectomy SLNB Total thyroidectomy Parathyroidectomy • Inguinal hernia >5 yrs • Exploratory lap w/ LOA • Open chole • Lap chole • Enterectomy w/ anastomosis • Colectomy, partial w/ anastomosis

  14. Least Competence • Surgical treatment of NEC • Orchiopexy • Transhiatalesophagectomy • Adrenalectomy • Open AAA repair • Endovascular AAA repair

  15. 100% Respondents Perceived Competence Operations (16 of 67) 24%

  16. 90% Respondents Perceived Competence Operations (34 of 67)

  17. 50% Respondents Perceived Competence

  18. Procedural Volume vs. Competence • For total major procedural volume • No correlation (r = 0.343; p=0.12) • For individual procedural volume • +ve correlation with four procedures • Esophagectomy (p=0.014) • Orchiopexy (p=0.03) • EGD (p=0.018) • Adrenalectomy (p=0.001)

  19. Summary • The majority of graduating general surgery residents feel they are competent to perform a very limited # of surgical procedures. • There is little consistency among general surgery residency graduates regarding which procedures are relevant to their practice.

  20. 1. Is the current clinical curriculum on target with general surgery graduates’ learning needs? 2. Should the clinical curriculum be better tailored to graduates’ future practice?

  21. -

  22. Literature Blumenthal et al, JAMA, 2001 “Overall (survey) data suggest that in 1998 residents…felt well...prepared for clinical practice. However, …the gaps still exist in the preparedness of physicians to manage the full range of patients, problems, and procedures they may confront at practitioners.”

  23. Operative Experience Decreasing* Kairys JC et al. JACS, 2008

  24. Introduction • Recent changes in general surgery and general surgery training have engendered questions about which procedures residents should become competent with by the end of their general surgery training. • While procedural numbers are used as a proxy for competence with specific procedures, a program’s final declaration of competence is largely based on a cumulative faculty assessment of the resident’s overall competence.

  25. Total Major Operations Decreasing* Kairys JC et al. JACS, 2008

More Related