1 / 14

Lexical Affect Sensing: Are Affect Dictionaries Necessary to Analyze Affect?

Lexical Affect Sensing: Are Affect Dictionaries Necessary to Analyze Affect?. Alexander Osherenko, Elisabeth André University of Augsburg. What emotions convey these textual utterances (SAL corpus)?. High arousal, negative valence: No, well , I'm not a fool .

gates
Télécharger la présentation

Lexical Affect Sensing: Are Affect Dictionaries Necessary to Analyze Affect?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lexical Affect Sensing: Are Affect Dictionaries Necessary to Analyze Affect? Alexander Osherenko, Elisabeth André University of Augsburg

  2. What emotions conveythese textual utterances (SAL corpus)? • High arousal, negative valence:No, well, I'm not a fool. • High arousal, positive valence:No, <laugh> I think I'm being stupid actually. • Low arousal, positive valence:Yup.

  3. Dictionaries • Dictionary of Affect Language (DAL - Whissell) „happy” (evaluation, activation, imagery)3.0000 2.7500 2.2 • Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Dictionary (LIWC) „happy” (categories)Affect, Positive emotion, Positive feeling • BNC frequency list11649 happy aj0 • SAL frequency list

  4. Research questions • Are recognition rates higher if word features are emotional? • Do emotive annotations in affect dictionaries improve recognition? • Are common words more useful than less common words? • Are dictionaries of affect more useful than general-purpose dictionaries?

  5. Feature Extraction and Evaluation • Word features • Selection of the most expressive words • Selection of the most frequent features • LIWC features (CAT-68 and CAT-8) • DAL features (EA-AVG) • Average values for the evaluation, activation, imagery scores

  6. Evaluation • 672 utterances from the SAL corpus as a 5-classes-problem • The majority vote strategy • The SVM classifier • Averaged recall value/number of word features

  7. Useful criterion of feature reduction without risking a severe degradation of recognition rates

  8. Do emotive annotations in affect dictionaries improve recognition? Affect-related features do not include discriminative information that is not yet included in the word counts

  9. Hard to say whether a reduction of features should be based rather on the frequency of words or their expressive qualities

  10. General-purpose dictionaries may provide similar results as affect dictionaries for similar numbers of features

  11. Recommendations • Frequency strategy is not worse than the emotional expressivity strategy • Similar trends for a movie reviews’ corpus • Results don‘t degrade dramatically when reducting number of word features (real-time recognition) • Acceptable results also with only affect annotations

  12. Thank you!

  13. Conclusion

  14. Mapping of FEELTRACE data onto affect segments • Examples: • [Affect segment: high_pos] (Laugh) I'm damn awful. How are you (laugh)? • [Affect segment: low_neg] Erm, that's probably true. 1.0 Activation high_neg high_pos neutral 0.2 Evaluation 1.0 low_neg low_pos

More Related