1 / 48

Engaging Students and Teaching Mathematics for Understanding

Engaging Students and Teaching Mathematics for Understanding. Carol E. Malloy, Ph.D. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill cmalloy@email.unc.edu Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership August 27, 2007 . Our Task.

gavivi
Télécharger la présentation

Engaging Students and Teaching Mathematics for Understanding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Engaging Students and Teaching Mathematics for Understanding Carol E. Malloy, Ph.D.University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill cmalloy@email.unc.eduMilwaukee Mathematics Partnership August 27, 2007

  2. Our Task To MOBILIZE our forces to educate students who are not succeeding in learning and understanding mathematics

  3. Equity The Achievement Gap NCLB Instruction Issues

  4. A Student’s Feelings

  5. Equity NCTM Equity Principle Excellence in mathematics education requires equity—high expectations and strong support for all students.

  6. Gap: Achievement or Opportunity What is the purpose of continually finding and reporting differences in racial and ethnic group achievement? A new way of normalizing self and stereotyping others.

  7. NCLB No Child Left Behind of the Federal Government Leave No Child Behind of the Children’s Defense Fund

  8. Breaking Down the Issues through Knowledge • Students • Advocates • Teachers • Learning

  9. Students Student are Messy Functions in relationship to the clean and often predictable nature of mathematics functions.

  10. Interest in mathematics Perception of mathematics Aptitude for reasoning with abstractions Perception of what is important Experiences Prior mathematical knowledge Communication skills Coursework in other academic areas Self-confidence Attitude toward learning Home and social life Special needs Cultural values Personal values Home resources Access to calculators, computers, and other tools Classroom citizenship Students

  11. Happiness and Joy

  12. REAL Issues of Opportunity • Recommendations for special education • Limited access to gifted education • Suspensions • Quality of curriculum and instruction • Beliefs of school administrators, teachers, parents, and students

  13. Advocates Parents, Community members, and Society are dependent upon TEACHERS

  14. Teachers Teachers are the key to students’ mathematics learning. More than any other single factor, teachers influence what mathematics students should learn and how well they learn it. (NCTM Teaching Principle)

  15. But sometimes

  16. Advocates and Teachers Should focus on • Pedagogy • Mathematical Tasks with appropriate Content • Interaction within the classroom And actively and persistently • Convince students that they can learn • Believe that they can learn

  17. Cognitive/Affective Opposition • Many communities value and encourage the acquisition of unique verbal expressiveness, • BUT schools place highest value on the written demonstration of verbal knowledge. • Many students’ view of the world is that of a unified environment, thus they use a mixture of holistic and analytical reasoning; • BUT many schools still concentrate on analytical reasoning.

  18. For Example Introducing the Golden Ratio

  19. Learning PreferencesAnalytic, field-independent, individual learners should be instructed in ways that encourage them to: • Focus on detail and use sequential/structured thinking, • Recall abstract ideas and irrelevant detail, engage in inanimate material, respond to intrinsic motivation, focus on the task, • Learn from formal lecture, • Achieve individually, and • Emphasize facts and principles.

  20. Knowing the Golden Ratio The Golden Ratio can be seen in rectangles and is visually pleasing. The ratio of the width to length of the Golden Ratio is about 1 to 1.618. 1 .618

  21. Learning Preferences Holistic, field-dependent, interdependent learners should be instructed in ways that encourage them to: • Focus on the whole, use improvisational intuitive thinking, • Recall relevant verbal ideas, • Engage in human and social content material, • Respond to extrinsic motivation, • Focus on interests, • Learn from informal class discussion, • Achieve interdependently, and • Narrate human concepts.

  22. Understanding the Golden Ratio 1. Determine your ratio by measuring the length from the navel to chin, length of head, navel to ground, and navel to top-of-head. What ratios did you find for your navel height: total height and navel to top of head: navel height? 2. Use the chart below to find our class ratios. Make a conjecture about the ratios. Consider the reciprocals of your ratios.

  23. Engaging Extensions • The Fibonacci Sequence begins 1,1,2,3,5,8, .... Expand the sequence to at least 12 terms. • Find the ratio of consecutive pairs of numbers in the sequence. • What conjecture can you make about the limit of these pairs of Fibonacci Numbers ? • Try to find the solution to this system of equations first by guess and check: x – y = 1 and xy = 1. • Now try another method of solution.

  24. We Must Use Varied Approaches

  25. NCTM Equity Principle for Every Child • Equity requires high expectations and worthwhile opportunities for all. • Equity requires accommodating differences to help everyone learn mathematics. • Equity requires resources and support for all classrooms and all students.

  26. Equity Equity does not mean that every student should receive identical instruction; instead, it demands that reasonable and appropriate accommodations be made as needed to promote access and attainment for all students. (PSSM, 2000)

  27. Comparison Using Second Holistic Approach

  28. Comparison

  29. Comparison

  30. Many of us have seen and heard the statements in the last column of the charts. They are the recommendations of the NCTM standards documents from the 1989 through 2000.

  31. Working Toward Success • These are exciting but challenging times in mathematics education. • We know more about teaching and learning than we did in the past. • We know students come to school with some understanding. • We have the ability to have students learn more with understanding.

  32. Learn, Reflect, Articulate Group A: Create geoboard squares with the given areas. Record your figures on geoboard dot paper. 1. A square with an area of four square units. 2. A square with an area of nine square units. 3. A square with an area of sixteen square units. 4. A SQUARE WITH THE AREA OF 5 SQUARE UNITS. 5. A square with an area of two square units. 6. A square with an area of eight square units. 7. A square with an area of ten square units.

  33. Finding Square with Area 10

  34. Let’s think about Fractions and Triangles How would you teach middle or high school students the relationship between a fraction an its equivalent percent? How would you teach a high school student when the segments from a vertex in a triangle are concurrent?

  35. Percentage Example • Students can use trial and error to find that each section is 1/3 of the circle or about 30--33%. This totals 90--99% if the circle. They could become more exact by computing similar findings for the remaining 10—1%, resulting in 1/3 equals 33 1/3 %.

  36. Exploration with Technology Compare the positions of segments in triangles from one vertex, including the altitudes, medians, perpendicular bisectors and angle bisectors. Use triangles that are isosceles, equilateral, and scalene. Include answers to the following in your comparison. • In what types of triangles will all of the segments from one vertex coincide? • When will all of the sets of segments from each vertex coincide?

  37. Results

  38. Isosceles and Equilateral

  39. What are these Tasks Really about? • They are moving students from doing problems through memorization of procedures …. • To doing and thinking mathematics.

  40. What would you expect if you asked students to write a fraction that is larger than 2/7? Look at these replies.

  41. Talk with your Neighbor • Which students demonstrate that they conceptually understand the size of fractions? • What could you do to help those who do not demonstrate their conceptual understanding?

  42. The Task at Hand Is for US • What can we do as teachers to help our students understand mathematics? • How can we ensure that they have understanding? • What can be done to help them apply their understanding to other situations?

  43. First consider the process through which students gain conceptual understanding. Dimensions of Understanding [1]: Students should • Construct relationships • Extend and apply mathematical knowledge • Reflect about experiences • Articulate what they know • Make the mathematical knowledge their own [1] Carpenter, Thomas. P., and Lehrer, Richard. “Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Understanding.” In Mathematics Classrooms That Promote Understanding, edited by Elizabeth Fennema and Thomas. A. Romberg, pp. 19-32. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 1999..

  44. Second, consider the tasks you are asking students to complete. Levels of Tasks: • Memorization Tasks: involve either reproducing previously learned facts, rules, formulae, or definitions OR committing facts, rules formulae or definitions to memory. • Procedures without Connections Tasks: are algorithmic. The use of the procedure is either specifically called for is its use is evident based on prior instruction, experience, or placement of the task. • Procedures with Connections Tasks: focus students' attention on the use of procedures for the purpose of developing deeper levels of understanding of mathematical concepts and ideas. • Doing Mathematics Tasks: require complex and non-algorithmic thinking (i.e. there is not a predictable, well-rehearsed approach or pathway explicitly suggested by the teas, task instructions, or a worked out example.) Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

  45. We Can Do It!

  46. “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful citizens can change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that ever has.” --Margaret Mead

More Related