1 / 5

Visualization of Large Network Structures: Bundled Edges or Node-Link Layouts?

Visualization of Large Network Structures: Bundled Edges or Node-Link Layouts?. Alexandru Telea a.c.telea@rug.nl. University of Groningen The Netherlands. Problem. How to visually understand a large network?. visualization method. answers / insight. large attributed graph. users,

gay-dudley
Télécharger la présentation

Visualization of Large Network Structures: Bundled Edges or Node-Link Layouts?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Visualization of Large Network Structures: Bundled Edges or Node-Link Layouts? Alexandru Telea a.c.telea@rug.nl University of Groningen The Netherlands

  2. Problem How to visually understand a large network? visualization method answers / insight large attributed graph users, task, questions • so many methods, so hard to choose • ‘best method’ combines • familiarity and intuitiveness for users • availability • simplicity of use • scalability and level-of-detail • capability to show both structure and attributes

  3. User study Compare a well-known classic with a strong newcomer! 1. Node-link diagrams • familiar to virtually all users • dozens of layouts (force-directed, hierarchical, trees, radial, …) • availability: Tulip framework [Auber et al, 03] – scalable to >1M nodes/edges 2. Hierarchical edge bundles • recent, very well received [InfoVis ‘06 best paper award] • presented technique immediately appealing… • …but is it better than node-link diagrams, and why (not), and when (not)? etc…

  4. User study Data, Tasks, Users • graphs: 1000…30K nodes, 2000…350K edges, 1..15 attributes/node or edge • tasks: top-level system decomposition, cluster identification, dependency vs attribute correlation, mutual dependency detection, symmetry detection • users: 12, academy+industry, from problem domain, not viz experts, unrelated to the tool builders (unbiased) • tools: Tulip pre-defined layouts + enhanced version of edge bundle viz • answers: checked & analyzed by domain & tool expert Edge bundle enhancements subpixel node rendering hierarchical edge & attribute aggregation gaps for cross-level edges ‘level lens’ mini table-lens for attribute overviews

  5. Results Edge bundles • clearly preferred when hierarchy & overviews were important in tasks • correlated table lenses provide the needed attribute overviews • unknown to users, but immediately learned • less suitable for structural symmetry detection • unsuitable when position is significant (inherently or due to prior mental maps) Node-link layouts • preferred when position is significant • better for assessing symmetry • better for visually tracing long paths in a context • clearly suboptimal when hierarchy and structure are to be combined • clearly less scalable visually/computationally (even in the highly optimized Tulip) Open questions • can we add position semantics to nodes/edges in the bundled edges? • how about a multilevel bundled edges layout using more concentric rings / edge layers? • how to add symmetry reflection in the bundled edges layout? • is the more recent node-link edge bundling [Holten et al, 09] indeed as effective? • how to show time dynamics in the bundled edges layout?

More Related