1 / 26

David Tshilumba

This project aims to increase the range and improve the performance of a nanopositioning system for pre-alignment of LINAC quadrupole in a laboratory setting. The research includes analytical modeling, finite element simulations, and experimental validation.

gbryant
Télécharger la présentation

David Tshilumba

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. David Tshilumba ESR3.3, WP3

  2. Background / MSc in Mechanical engineering from University of Brussels (André Jaumotte Award) Master thesis: “Contrôle des électro-aimantsfinaux d’un collisionneurlinéaire” Member of LSC (LIGO Scientific Collaboration) Main author of 1 article, Co-author of 2 articles published in refereed journals and 3 publications in conference proceedings LIGO: www.ligo.org SLAC: http://www.linearcollider.org/ILC

  3. ESR3.3, WP3 / Contract start date: 1stApril 2014 PACMAN subject: Nano-Positioning of the main LINAC quadrupole as   means of laboratory pre-alignment PhD Institution: Delft University of Technology Secondment: Delft University + TNO (6M ) David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  4. PhD thesis/ Starting date: 1stApril 2014 Thesis title: Nano-Positioning of the main LINAC quadrupole as   means of laboratory pre-alignment Statuts: Admitted to the doctoral school (Go/No Go meeting) Credits: 45 GS credits are required; 12.5 GS credits acquired. David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  5. To upgrade the existing type 1 prototype for nanopositioningand vibration isolation • Cross check betweendifferentcomponents • To study the possibility to increase the range of the nanopositioningstage Project / Piezostackactuator: Stiffness: 480 N/µm Stroke: 15 µm Resolution: 0.15 nm Flexural joints: Axial stiffness: 300 N/µm Rotationalstiffness: 220 Nm/rad Objectives David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  6. Typical applications • Atomic force microscopy • Semiconductor test equipment • Scanning interferometry State of the art Typical specifications David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  7. State of the art Performances: Range: 10mm x 10mm Parasitic in-plane rotation: ≤ 100rad Resolution: ≤4nm Low stiffness Courtesy of S.Awtar, G. Parmar David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  8. Research gap/ • Functions : • Nanopositioning • Vibration isolation • Alignment Study of an integrated positioning system with high stiffness (>100N/m) capable of moving heavy loads (>100 kg) with high resolution (<1nm) over a large range (≥1mm) David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  9. Range increase concept: inverted lever mechanism • Possible monolithic design • No friction • No backlash • No wear • Avoid plastic deformation! Project / Range increase concept n<1 Stiffness amplification Resolutionimprovement David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  10. Analytic simplified model (Matlab) 3D CAD modelling (CATIA-Smart Team) Static and dynamic Finite Element simulations (ANSYS) Finite Element simulation results + Full dynamic model Positioning control algorithms Experimental validation of positioning performances Project / Method followed David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  11. State of the art PACMAN nano-positioning system Development of a long range actuator Project / Requirements definition: March 15 System review and upgrade: Apr 15 Design of concept 1DOF: Aug 15 Adaptation of the type 1 setup of the PACMAN bench: Aug 15 Performance characterization: Oct 15 Positioning strategies comparison Tasks description Extrapolation to 2 DOFs: Sept 16 Positioning test in CMM David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  12. Parasitic resonance modes • Design target: 1st resonance ≥100Hz • Unexpectedeigen modes detected by EMA between 30Hz and 50Hz • Suspect root cause: • connectionstiffnessbetween components • Bolting: up to 40% drop in eigenfrequency • Gluing: up to 8.5% drop in eigenfrequency Project / Results Courtesy of M. Guinchard David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  13. Parasitic resonance modes Project / Results • Furtherimprovement: • Monolithic base plate design • Additionalstiffeners Otherroot cause: variable contact on a supporting point modify interface withcam stage David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  14. 1 Longitudinal + plate bend Project / 1. 48.135 Hz 2. 70.269 Hz 3. 123.35 Hz 4. 195.11 Hz 5. 236.4 Hz 6. 256.81 Hz 3 Torsion Results 2 side mode + bend • Adjustable jack for system equilibrium • Optimizedfiniteelement model (1 hour) • Bending of baseplate • Lowest modes lateral and vertical components • issue David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  15. 1 Longitudinal mode 1. 91.6 Hz 2. 117.2 Hz 3. 167.14 Hz 4. 244 Hz 5. 270.39 Hz 6. 278.4 Hz Project / 2 Side mode 3 Torsion Results • Larger flat contact surface withground • Base plate reinforcement (longitudinal) • Lowest mode in longitudinal direction • Not an issue David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  16. Project / • Results Improvement: first lateral mode at 100Hz David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  17. Roll motion reduction: parallel kinematics • Permissible roll displacement: 100μrad • Aluminumeccentricshear pins • 5.15μrad/μmcoupling • Alternative: rotationalsymmetryhinges • 0.47μrad/μmcoupling • Features: • Less components • Tunabletranslationalstiffness • Design optimizationrequired (Spaceavailability) Project / Results David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  18. Training in CATIA-SmartTeam • Basic principles of metrology • Experimental modal analysis • Making Presentations • CERN guide training • Team building Training / David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  19. Secondmentin TUDelft and TNO • Thesis background • High performance mechatronic system design • Modal analysis measurement on support structure of large mirror of a large telescope Training / David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  20. Conferences & workshop: • PACMAN workshop, 02-04.02.2015 one presentation • MEDSI 2016 (Mechanical Engineering Design of Synchrotron Radiation Equipment and Instrumentation) • ICM 2016 (International Conference on Mechatronics) • ICMRE (International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering) • ICMMR(International Conference on Mechanics and Mechatronics Research) • ICROM (International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics ) Outreach & Dissemination / David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  21. Networking Opportunities / • ACTUATOR conference (May 2014) • Precision Fair Eindhoven (November 2014) • Secondment at TUDelft and TNO • EUSPEN (European Society of Precision Engineering) David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  22. Impact / • Mechatronic system designer • Modelling of complex mechanical assemblies • Improve employability • Networking David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  23. Thank you for your attention

  24. Current system overview/ • Limitations: • precision of coarse stage (>10µm) • insufficient stroke of fine stage • for thermal load in tunnel ( >100µm) • Coarsestage (cams) • lockedafterpre-alignment • Resolution : 0.35µm • Stroke: 3mm • Fine stage (piezostacks) • Resolution: 0.15nm • Stiffness : 480N/um(piezo) • Useful Stroke: 5µm Increase of range of fine stage David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

  25. CLIC: Nano-positioning Field gradients K for restoring force in quadrupole Beam steering / K=dBy/dx K=dBx/dy Beamtrajectory technique Lorentz Force Control of beam oscillation Collision qualityoptimized Courtesy of J. Pfingstner D. Tshilumba, Delft, 15 April 2015

  26. Type 1 magnet nano-positioning: Inter-pulse sequence Time (ms) t1 t2 0 20 Nanopositioning/ Stage 1 2 3 4 • Beam divided into trains • Calculation of new positions by global controller • Positioning step of magnet • check of actual new position (machine protection) 30 David TSHILUMBA, ESR3.3 PACMAN Mid-term review 28-29/05/2015

More Related