1 / 22

Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A: State of the Art in Massive Model Visualization

INFORMATIK. Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A: State of the Art in Massive Model Visualization. Ingo Wald MPI für Informatik Saarbrücken, Germany. Andreas Dietrich Saarland University Saarbrücken, Germany. The Speakers. Ingo Wald (http://www.mpi-sb.mpg.de/~wald)

gefen
Télécharger la présentation

Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A: State of the Art in Massive Model Visualization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INFORMATIK Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A:State of the Art inMassive Model Visualization Ingo Wald MPI für Informatik Saarbrücken, Germany Andreas Dietrich Saarland University Saarbrücken, Germany

  2. The Speakers • Ingo Wald (http://www.mpi-sb.mpg.de/~wald) • Post-doc MPI für Informatik (MPII) Saarbrücken • Main research topics: • Realtime ray tracing (core technologies) • Parallel/distributed rendering • (Interactive) Global Illumination • Andreas Dietrich (http://graphics.cs.uni-sb.de/~dietrich) • Third-year PhD student, Saarland University • Main research topics: • Out-of-core rendering (in particular high-quality OOC rendering) • Realtime Ray Tracing in practical applications (VR, SceneGraphs) Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  3. Agenda • Motivation and Introduction [10-15m, Wald] • Part I – Rasterization Based Approaches [1h, Dietrich] • General techniques and concepts • Discussion and classification • Specific rasterization-based massive model rendering systems • Break [15m] • Part II – Ray Tracing Based Approaches [1h, Wald] • Why ray tracing for massively complex models ? • Offline systems • Interactive systems • Summary and Audience Discussion [open end, audience] Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  4. Motivation and Introduction

  5. Motivation • Rendering a model  Visible surface determination • Basic problem believed to be be solved • Hidden Surface Removal (HSR) methods of choice: • Z-buffer • Ray casting • Dramatic improvements in CG hardware • Can render many million triangles / second • Widely available even in consumer PCs • Ongoing trend to more and more performance • Even faster than Moore’s law: ~2.x performance increase / year Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  6. Motivation • Rendering a model  Visible surface determination • Basic problem believed to be be solved • Hidden Surface Removal (HSR) methods of choice: • Z-buffer • Ray casting • Dramatic improvements in CG hardware • Can render many million triangles / second • Widely available even in consumer PCs • Ongoing trend to more and more performance • Even faster than Moore‘s law: ~2.x performance increase / year However: Scene complexity rises even faster Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  7. Motivation • Quickly rising scene complexity: • Many scenes too large to be rendered by “brute force” • Definition of “massively complex model”: A model that can’t be handled by standard techniques Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  8. Motivation • Quickly rising scene complexity: • Many scenes too large to be rendered by “brute force” • Definition of “massively complex model”: A model that can’t be handled by standard techniques • Many sources for such models… • “Modelling nature” … Real-world complexity • Acquisition/measuring equipment • Scientific computing / simulation datasets • Large-scale engineering projects Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  9. Motivation Example I:Modelling nature • “Real world” is excessively complex • Trees (leaves), grass, hair/fur, (fractal) surface structure (stone, bark,…) • Interactive apps allow zooming in  would like high complexity • Modelling only „some“ of these effects generates many triangles Landscape scene [Wand] (4*10^8 triangles) “Sunflowers” scene (10^9 triangles) Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  10. Motivation Example II:Acquisition of Real-world objects • Modelled objects often look “artificial” … • Increasing use of “real” objects  Acquisition • Tremendous improvements in measuring equipment (sub-mm accuracy) • Millions to billions of samples / object “Visible Female” 1700+ images of 2k*2k pixels Eye of “David” (1mm accuracy) Even shows chisel marks “Lucy” – 15M points Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  11. Motivation Example III:Scientific / simulation datasets • More and more effects today get simulated • Atom bombs, jet engine combustion, airflow, drugs/molecules, … • Tremendous increase in simulation accuracy • Immensely huge datasets Lawrence-Livermore “Richtmeyer-Meshkov simulation” (single time step only) 270 time steps @ 2048x2048x1970 samples  1.5 TeraByte data (sev. years old…) Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  12. Motivation Example III:Scientific / Numerical simulation • More and more effects today get simulated • Atom bombs, jet engine combustion, airflow, drugs/molecules, … • Tremendous increase in simulation accuracy • Immensely huge datasets Lawrence-Livermore “Richtmeyer-Meshkov simulation” (single time step only) 270 time steps @ 2048x2048x1970 samples  1.5 TeraByte data (sev. years old…) Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  13. Motivation Example IV:Large-scale engineering projects • Virtual prototyping / CAD ever more important • Applied to ever larger engineering projects • cars, airplanes, power plants, ships, … • Large scale projects too complex for single designer  Collaborative engineering • Coll.eng.:Many designers, each models individual parts • Each individual part modelled at full accuracy • Steering wheel: 1-2M tris, Safety belt: 1-2M, screw: 1-10k… • CAD uses NURBS: Growing accuracy demands  Each individual part is already at the FGX card‘s limit • Combined model (sum of all parts…) far too complex • Golf V: ~2,000 parts, 20M triangles • Boeing 777: ~13,000 parts, 350M triangles (sev. years old) Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  14. Motivation Example IV:Large-scale engineering projects “Power Plant” – 12.5M triangles “Boeing 777” – 350M triangles “Double eagle tanker” – 80M triangles Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  15. Geometric Complexity:Boeing Example… Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  16. Geometric Complexity:Boeing Example… Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  17. Geometric Complexity:Boeing Example… Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  18. Geometric Complexity:Boeing Example… Same complexity all over the model… Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  19. Motivation Wrap-up Motivation wrap-up: Three important conclusions Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  20. Motivation Wrap-up Motivation wrap-up: Three important conclusions • Complex models ARE important • Come from many different fields • Acquisition, nature/outdoor, simulation, engineering, … • Important for many real-world applications Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  21. Motivation Wrap-up Motivation wrap-up: Three important conclusions • Complex models ARE important • Come from many different fields • Acquisition, nature/outdoor, simulation, engineering, … • Important for many real-world applications • Rendering performance increases rapidly…… but model size grows even faster • There will be “massively complex models” even in 10 years… Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

  22. Motivation Wrap-up Motivation wrap-up: Three important conclusions • Complex models ARE important • Come from many different fields • Acquisition, nature/outdoor, simulation, engineering, … • Important for many real-world applications • Rendering performance increases rapidly…… but model size grows even faster • There will be “massively complex models” even in 10 years… • It’s important to find techniques for rendering them • Todays “complex” models are tomorrows “standard” models Afrigraph 2004 Tutorial A

More Related