1 / 35

The Acoustics and Perception of American English Vowels

The Acoustics and Perception of American English Vowels. Conventional F 1- F 2 Plot. Acoustic Vowel Diagram. Peterson & Barney (1952) Study conducted at Bell Labs. The 1 st big acoustic study carried out with the (then) recently invented sound spectrograph machine. 1. Recordings

genica
Télécharger la présentation

The Acoustics and Perception of American English Vowels

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Acoustics and Perception of American English Vowels Hillenbrand: Vowels

  2. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  3. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  4. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  5. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  6. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  7. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  8. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  9. Conventional F1-F2 Plot Acoustic Vowel Diagram Hillenbrand: Vowels

  10. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  11. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  12. Peterson & Barney (1952) Study conducted at Bell Labs. The 1st big acoustic study carried out with the (then) recently invented sound spectrograph machine. 1. Recordings 10 vowels (i,ɪ,ɛ,æ,ɑ,ɔ,ʊ,u,ʌ,ɚ) /hVd/ context (“heed,” “hid,” “head,” “had,” etc.) 76 talkers (33 men, 28 women, 15 children) 2. Measurements: F0, F1-F3 3. Listening Study 70 listeners asked to identify each test signal as one of ten words (“heed,” “hid,” “head,” “had,” etc.) Hillenbrand: Vowels

  13. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  14. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  15. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  16. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  17. Same Data as Previous Figure, but Plotted on a Single Graph Hillenbrand: Vowels

  18. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  19. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  20. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  21. Training Testing Hillenbrand: Vowels

  22. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  23. What does this mean? It appears as though listeners are recognizing vowels based on information other than F0 and F1-F3. What are the possibilities? Two Candidates: · Duration · Patterns of spectralchange over time Hillenbrand: Vowels

  24. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  25. Original Duration Neutral Duration Short Duration Long Duration Hillenbrand: Vowels

  26. Logic: If duration plays no role in vowel recognition, the 4 signal types ought to be equally intelligible; i.e., artificially modifying duration will not affect what vowel is heard. On the other hand, if duration plays a role in vowel perception, the OD signals ought to be more intelligible than any of the duration-modified signals. • Also, there are specific kinds of changes in vowel identity that we would expect. For example: • Shortened /i/ ought to be heard as /I/ • Lengthened /I/ ought to be heard as /i/ • Shortened /A/ ought to be heard as /‰/ • Lengthened /‰/ ought to be heard as /A/ • Shortened /u/ ought to be heard as /U/ • Lengthened /U/ ought to be heard as /u/ • Shortened /å/ ought to be heard as /ú/ • Lengthened /ú/ ought to be heard as /å/ Hillenbrand: Vowels

  27. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  28. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  29. Effects of Duration on Vowel Perception • Original Duration, Long Duration, Short Duration Hillenbrand: Vowels

  30. The Role of Spectral Change in Vowel Perception Hillenbrand: Vowels

  31. More examples. Note especially the rise in F2 for /U/ and /ú/. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  32. Here’s another way to visualize patterns of formant frequency change in vowels: This figure shows formant frequencies measured at the beginning of the vowel and a 2nd time at the end of the vowel. (The phonetic symbol is plotted at the 2nd measurement). Note that some vowels (e.g., /i/ and /u/) are pretty steady over time, but others have formants that change quite a bit throughout the course of the vowel (e.g., /e/, /o/, /ú/, /U/, /A/, /I/). Hillenbrand: Vowels

  33. NAT:Naturally spoken/hAd/ OF: Synthesized, preserving original formant contours FF: Synthesized with flattened formants Hillenbrand: Vowels

  34. Key comparison is OF vs. FF: If the formant movements don’t matter, flattening the formant contour will not affect the vowel percept, and the recognition rates for OF and FF should be very similar. On the other hand, if the formant movements are important, the FF signals will be less intelligible than the OF signals. Conclusion: Spectral change patterns do matter. Hillenbrand: Vowels

  35. Hillenbrand: Vowels

More Related