1 / 21

Chapter 11

Chapter 11. Interpretation and Third Parties. I. Interpretation and Legislation. A. Civil Code. If the parties cannot resolve their differences, it becomes necessary for the court to interpret what the contract means

geordi
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 11 Interpretation and Third Parties

  2. I. Interpretation and Legislation

  3. A. Civil Code • If the parties cannot resolve their differences, it becomes necessary for the court to interpret what the contract means • In 1872, the legislature enacted numerous Civil Code sections to assist with interpretation of contracts

  4. B. Code of Civil Procedure • The Code of Civil Procedure also contains several helpful sections for interpreting terms • Courts now use the objective standard to determine what the intention of a “reasonable person” would be

  5. C. Whole Contract and Divisible Contract • Courts must determine if a contract is a whole (entire) contract or is a divisible (severable) contract • If the contracts is whole, then all of the performances within that contract are required in order to accomplish full performance • A divisible contract is one which has separate performance obligations which are given in exchange for separate performance obligations

  6. D. Incorporation By Reference • An “Incorporation by Reference” clause may appear in a contract. “[A] copy of the Master Lease is attached hereto as Exhibit ‘C’ and incorporated herein by this reference”

  7. II. Parol Evidence

  8. Parol Evidence Rule • “Terms set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement…may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement” [CCP§ 1856]

  9. A. Let’s Go To Court • If a parol evidence objection with regard to evidence gets admitted into court for consideration, the court must determine whether the previously admitted writing was intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement • A court can make this determination using one of 3 approaches: • Four corner test • Four corner-plus test • Integration clause test

  10. Integration Clause • If the parties utilized an INTEGRATION CLAUSE in the contract, the court knows that the parties intended the writing as the final expression of their agreement, unless evidence can be introduced that the integration clause was included by fraud, duress, or mistake • Many standard forms, such as rental agreements, vehicle purchase contracts and franchise agreements, contain an integration clause

  11. III. Contracts and Third Parties

  12. Sometimes a third party becomes involved in a contract. • Third party beneficiaries • Assignments of rights or delegation of duties • A simplistic way to differentiate the two would be generally: • If there are three parties in the contract from the beginning, it is a third party beneficiary situation • If there are two parties in the contract from the beginning and a third party is added at a later date, it is an assignment situation

  13. IV. Assignment

  14. Assignment • ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS is when a party to a contract transfers his or her rights in the contract to another • DELEGATION OF DUTIES is when a party transfers his or her duties in the contract to another • The term “assignment” is generally used to cover both an assignment of rights and a delegation of duties • Assignments may either be a “partial” or “total” assignment

  15. A. Is the Contract Assignable? • Whether or not a contract is assignable will depend upon on the nature of the contract and the terms and conditions contained therein • As a general rule, contracts are assignable without the permission of the other party, with 2 major exceptions: • Contract Prohibition • Changing Risk or Obligation

  16. B. Assignment Issues • If a contract is assignable, then the question becomes: • What was the intention of the parties? • Rights of the Assignee Against the Assignor • Competing Assignees • Delegation of Duties

  17. V. Third Party Beneficiary Contracts

  18. In third party beneficiary contracts, there are 3 parties mentioned in or intended to be in the contract at the time of contracting • Incidental beneficiaries • Intended beneficiaries

  19. A. Incidental Beneficiaries • An INCIDENTAL BENEFICIARY is a third party who will benefit from the contract between the parties, but that benefit is so removed and remote that the beneficiary receives only an incidental benefit from the contract • The parties to the contract did not make the contract “expressly for the benefit” of the incidental beneficiary • The incidental beneficiary has no rights in the contract and cannot sue to enforce it

  20. B. Intended Beneficiaries • An INTENDED BENEFICIARY is a party that is intended to receive a benefit in the contract • The contract was made “expressly for the benefit” of this party • “A contract made expressly for the benefit of a third person may be enforced by him at any time before the parties thereto rescind” [Civil Code § 1559]

  21. Interpretation and Legislation Civil Code Code of Civil Procedure Whole Contract and Divisible Contracts Incorporation by Reference Parol Evidence Let’s Go To Court Contracts and Third Parties Assignment Is the Contract Assignable? Assignment Issues Third Party Beneficiary Contracts Incidental Beneficiaries Intended Beneficiaries Chapter Summary

More Related