1 / 20

AutoCAD® . NET: Developing for AutoCAD Using IronPython and IronRuby

AutoCAD® . NET: Developing for AutoCAD Using IronPython and IronRuby. Kean Walmsley Senior Manager Worldwide Developer Technical Services Autodesk Developer Network. About the Presenter.

gerodi
Télécharger la présentation

AutoCAD® . NET: Developing for AutoCAD Using IronPython and IronRuby

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AutoCAD® .NET: Developing for AutoCAD Using IronPython and IronRuby Kean Walmsley Senior Manager Worldwide Developer Technical Services Autodesk Developer Network

  2. About the Presenter • Kean joined DevTech in August 1995, and has since worked in a number of different positions and countries (UK, USA, India and Switzerland). These days he spends most of his time on management-related activities, but still manages to keep involved at a technical level with our products. • Since July 2006 Kean has maintained a development-related blog at: blogs.autodesk.com/through-the-interface • Kean holds a Licenced’Informatique from l’Université de Paris-Sud and a Masters in Computer Science from the University of Kent at Canterbury.

  3. Agenda • Introduction • What Makes a Language Dynamic? • Microsoft’s Dynamic Language Runtime • Introducing IronPython & IronRuby • Hosting DLR Languages in AutoCAD • Applications: HelloWorld, SolidJig, PipeOverrule • Summary • An Honourable Mention: Boo • The Future • Resources

  4. Introduction • Increasing interest in “dynamic” or “scripting” languages • Well-suited for gluing components and systems • Advances in language design have led to leaps in productivity • Computing power is becoming cheaper and more accessible • Quickly-developed, reusable code with modest runtime overhead is a desirable trade-off • Assembly language is the quickest code to execute • Now very common to work with a “process virtual machine” • Java Virtual Machine, .NET’s Common Language Runtime • Emphasis shifts from compile-time type-checking to unit testing • A very important step when working with dynamic languages

  5. Typical Properties of a Dynamic Language • Dynamically typed • Fewer variable type declarations: code is cleaner and simpler • Looser rules around code boundaries for implementing objects/interfaces • Interpreted • A REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) lets you try code quickly • AutoCAD’s command-line is a REPL for AutoLISP • Reduced code volume • Code is smaller, more readable and should contain fewer bugs • Learnable • Straightforward syntax which leads to early productivity • True for Python & Ruby, perhaps less so for JavaScript

  6. Important Dynamic Concept: Duck Typing “When I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck.” • James Whitcomb Riley 1849-1916 • An object's current protocol determines the valid semantics • Allows polymorphism without inheritance • Some pseudo-code * functioncalculate(a, b, c) => return (a+b)*c calculate (1, 2, 3) 9 calculate ([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], 2) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] calculate (‘one ', 'and two, ', 3) one and two, one and two, one and two, * assumes + and * operators are defined for integers, lists and strings

  7. Microsoft’s Dynamic Language Runtime • Allows creation of dynamic .NET languages • Set of shared, dynamic services built on top of the CLR • Dynamic type system • Dynamic method dispatch • Dynamic code generation • Hosting API • Originally developed as part of IronPython 1.0 • Abstracted out and shipped separately with IronPython 2.0 • Now also used by IronRuby • Libraries can be shared between languages • Planned to be used by other language implementations • IronScheme, Managed JScript, Nua

  8. IronPython • The first, most mature dynamic language on the CLR/DLR • Currently at version 2.6 • An implementation of Python • Developed by Guido van Rossum, first release in 1991 • Widely used at Google, Guido’s current employer • Defining principles • One best way of doing things, simple and consistent • Characteristics • Whitespace is significant • Immutable strings, tuples • Slices • Explicit self parameter in class methods

  9. IronRuby • The more recent addition to the “Iron” stable (currently 0.91) • Also now using the DLR, but not yet the same version as IronPython • An implementation of Ruby • Developed by Yukihiro Matsumoto (Matz), first release in 1995 • Really became popular around 2005 • Defining principles • Flexibility, everything is an object, principle of least surprise, natural not simple • Characteristics • Blocks • Naming conventions • local_var, $global_var, @instance_var, @class_var • ClassName, method_name • No need for brackets in function calls • Cleaner object orientation support

  10. Hosting DLR Languages in AutoCAD • Implement two simple loader applications using a CLR language • I’ve used C# , could also have used VB.NET or even F# • Need to be NETLOADed (or demand-loaded) in AutoCAD • Define a load command for their language (RBLOAD/PYLOAD) • Command uses the DLR Hosting API • Different techniques currently needed IronPython IronRuby LanguageSetupls= Ruby.CreateRubySetup(); ScriptRuntimeSetuprs= newScriptRuntimeSetup(); rs.LanguageSetups.Add(ls); rs.DebugMode = true; ScriptRuntime runtime = Ruby.CreateRuntime(rs); ScriptEngineengine = Ruby.GetEngine(runtime); engine.ExecuteFile(file); Dictionary<string, object> options = newDictionary<string, object>(); options["Debug"] = true; ScriptEngineengine = Python.CreateEngine(options); engine.ExecuteFile(file); • Enable scriptdebugging

  11. HelloWorld • Very simple application defining two commands • MSG – print a message to the command-line • MYCIR – create a circle in the modelspace IronPython IronRuby def mycir   doc = Aas::Application.document_manager.mdi_active_document   db = doc.database tr = doc.transaction_manager.start_transaction bt= tr.get_object(db.block_table_id,Ads::OpenMode.for_read) btr= tr.get_object(db.current_space_id,Ads::OpenMode.for_write) pt = Ag::Point3d.new(10,10,0) cir = Ads::Circle.new(pt,Ag::Vector3d.z_axis,2) btr.append_entity(cir) tr.add_newly_created_d_b_object(cir, true) tr.commit tr.dispose defmycir():   doc = aas.Application.DocumentManager.MdiActiveDocument   db = doc.Database tr = doc.TransactionManager.StartTransaction() bt= tr.GetObject(db.BlockTableId,ads.OpenMode.ForRead) btr = tr.GetObject(db.CurrentSpaceId,ads.OpenMode.ForWrite) pt = ag.Point3d(10,10,0) cir = ads.Circle(pt,ag.Vector3d.ZAxis,2) btr.AppendEntity(cir) tr.AddNewlyCreatedDBObject(cir, True) tr.Commit() tr.Dispose()

  12. SolidJig • Define an EntityJig to create a Solid3d box • Define a BOXJIG command to run the jig IronPython IronRuby # A jig to create a Solid3d - in this case a box class SolidJig < Aei::EntityJig   # Constructor   def SolidJig.new(ent)     super   end   # The function called to run the jig   def start_jig(ed, pt)     # The start point is specified outside the jig     @start = pt     @end = pt     @sol = self.entity     return ed.drag(self) end … # A jig to create a Solid3d - in this case a box classSolidJig(aei.EntityJig): # Initialization function def __init__(self, ent): # Store the object and call the base class self._sol = ent aei.EntityJig.__init__(self, ent) # The function called to run the jig defStartJig(self, ed, pt): # The start point is specific outside the jig self._start = pt self._end = pt returned.Drag(self) …

  13. PipeOverrule • A more complex application using AutoCAD 2010’s Overrule API • DrawableOverrule for WorldDraw, TransformOverrule for Explode • Implemented for lines and circles • MAKEPIPE command to add XData, assigning a radius IronPython IronRuby def world_draw(d, wd)   ...   super   ...    # Draw a pipe around the line   ... clr = Ads::Circle.new start, norm, radius   pipe = Ads::ExtrudedSurface.new   begin pipe.create_extruded_surface(clr,norm,@sweep_opts)   rescue print_message "\nFailed with CreateExtrudedSurface."   end clr.dispose() pipe.world_draw(wd) pipe.dispose() ...   return true end def WorldDraw(self, d, wd):   ... PipeDrawOverrule.WorldDraw(self, d, wd)   ... # Draw a pipe around the line   ... clr = ads.Circle(start, norm, radius)   pipe = ads.ExtrudedSurface() try: pipe.CreateExtrudedSurface(clr,norm,self._sweepOpts) except: print_message("\nFailed with CreateExtrudedSurface.") clr.Dispose() pipe.WorldDraw(wd) pipe.Dispose()   ...    return True

  14. Summary • Dynamic languages provide easy paths into programming • Great for simple tasks without stringent performance requirements • Arguably the majority of programming tasks, these days • Python and Ruby are ultimately quite similar • Sects of the same church, rather than different religions • IronPython and IronRuby are great options if using the CLR • Also interesting for AutoCAD .NET development • Will become more so over time, as they share a common DLR • That said…

  15. An Honourable Mention: Boo • A statically-typed language on the CLR using Python syntax • Allows you to compile .NET assemblies (.EXE or .DLL) • Provides many advantages of dynamic languages • Simple syntax, duck typing • Has the “safety” of static type-checking • Compilation step creates assembly containing MSIL • Boo syntax is mostly like Python • Some improvements for CLR and OO support • “super” borrowed from Ruby • “import” additional namespaces, “override” for defs that implement virtuals • “constructor()” instead of “__init__(self)” • No direct support for global variables • Make them static members of a “Globals” class • Use assembly attributes to define commands, etc. • Overall a very interesting compromise

  16. The Future • Dynamic languages have gained widespread acceptance • And are being used for serious development activities • They’re also influencing statically-typed languages • C# 4.0 introduces the “dynamic” keyword dynamiccalc = GetCalculator(); intsum = calc.Add(10, 20); • Expect to see more of this, over time • “Compiler as a service” will enable dynamic code generation • It’s a good time to think about the benefits of dynamic code • This style of programming is becoming increasingly pervasive

  17. Agenda • Introduction • What Makes a Language Dynamic? • Microsoft’s Dynamic Language Runtime • Introducing IronPython& IronRuby • Hosting DLR Languages In AutoCAD • Applications: HelloWorld, SolidJig, PipeOverrule • Summary • An Honourable Mention: Boo • The Future • Resources

  18. Resources • Scripting: Higher Level Programming for the 21st Century • home.pacbell.net/ouster/scripting.html (IEEE Computer, March ‘98) • Empirical comparison of C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, Rexx, & Tcl • page.mi.fu-berlin.de/prechelt/Biblio/jccpprt_computer2000.pdf • CodePlex projects (with current version) • Dynamic Language Runtime – codeplex.com/dlr (0.92) • IronPython – codeplex.com/ironpython(2.6) • IronRuby – codeplex.com/ironruby (0.91) • The Boo Programming Language – boo.codehaus.org • C# 4.0 and Beyond – code.msdn.microsoft.com/csharpfuture • My blog – blogs.autodesk.com/through-the-interface

  19. Questions

More Related