1 / 17

TF-LSD Deliverables

TF-LSD Deliverables. 2nd TF-LSD meeting, Amsterdam, 2. February 2001 Peter Gietz Peter.gietz@DAASI.de. AGENDA. Taxonomy draft and CIP work A. TF-LSD information site B. CIP implementations interoperability C. Privacy Study D. European White Pages service specs

gerry
Télécharger la présentation

TF-LSD Deliverables

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TF-LSD Deliverables 2nd TF-LSD meeting, Amsterdam, 2. February 2001 Peter Gietz Peter.gietz@DAASI.de

  2. AGENDA • Taxonomy draft and CIP work • A. TF-LSD information site • B. CIP implementations interoperability • C. Privacy Study • D. European White Pages service specs • E. Experimental White Pages service • F. X.521-DC interoperability • All the rest

  3. Taxonomy draft and CIP work • Moats/Hedberg: A Taxonomy of Methods for LDAP Clients Finding Servers • Client configuration • Well known DNS aliases • Service Location Protocol • Referrals • SRV records • Well known DNS aliases • RFC 2219 • „ldap.xx.yy“ • Implemented in web2ldap

  4. Taxonomy contd. • DNS SRV records • RFC 2052, RFC 2782 and draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2782bis-00.txt • _Service._Proto.Domain IN SRV Priority Weight Port Target • Implemented in web2ldap • Used in draft-zeilenga-ldap-root-01.txt: „OpenLDAP Root Service - An experimental LDAP referral service“ • DNS SRV and referrals: • draft-zeilenga-ldapnsref-00.txt • Objectclass dNSReferral • Ref: ldap:/// + SRV -> complete referral

  5. Taxonomy contd. • DNS SRV and URIs: • draft-andrews-http-srv-00.txt • Can be used for looking up ldap ports • Conflict resolution: ports in URI and SRV RR • DNS SRV and PKIX: • draft-ietf-pkix-pkixrep-00.txt • PKIX Repository Locator Service for: • LDAP • HTTP • OCSP

  6. Taxonomy contd. • Service Location Protocol v2 • RFC 2608 • Service template for LDAP • Highly sofisticated protocol • Uses multicast • User Agent – Service Agent • User Agent – Directory Agent – Service Agent

  7. Taxonomy contd. • Do we need a Deliverable on all this? • „that provides experiences of using all of the different possible ways of finding and connecting together LDAP servers“ (DC)

  8. A. TF-LSD Information site • Responsible: Yuri • Done and in progress • Thanks to Yuri • Any comments?

  9. B. CIP Interoperability • Responsible: Peter • Co-workers: Roland, Henny • Anyone else? • This should be done fast: due January 2001 • Proposed time line: • Preparations: now – 16.2. • Tests: 19.2. To 23.2. • Writing document: 26.2.-2.3. • Three implementations test worthy: • Ericson TISDAG implementation • DESIRE II TIO index • Rolands GIDS

  10. CIP Interoperability contd. • What to test? • TIO interoperability in terms of: • Scalability • Performance • Internationalization • Referrals • Functionality v2/v3 • Performance

  11. CIP Interoperability contd. • How to test? • Test data set: telephone data of Sweden • Which host(s)? • Which operatingsystem(s)?

  12. C. Privacy study • Responsible: Peter • Co-workers: who else? • Due March 2001 • (so should be finished by end of April latest) • Proposed structure: • European privacy legislation • Description of a generic CIP based WP-Service • Privacy issues in such a service • Organizational and technical solutions

  13. D. European WP service specs • Responsible: Roland • Co-workers: Peter, Konstantin, Henny, Diego, Stig • Who else? • Due June 2001 • Can be done if more people involved that write single chapters • Specs will utilize the studies on interoperability and privacy

  14. D. European WP service specs • Specs should include: • General architecture • Schema (EduPerson??) • TIO distribution mechanism • Registry for Servers and crawlers • Crawler policy • Authentication mechanisms • Internationalization issues

  15. E. Experimental WP service • Responsible: Konstantin • Co-workers: the specs people • Who else? • Due: August 2001 • Work should be done paralell with the specs • Otherwise we have to postpone dead line

  16. F. X.521-DC interoperability • Responsible: Ton? • Co-Workers: Diego, Luuk, David Ch., Roland, Peter • Due: November 2001 • May be this can be finished earlier

  17. All the rest • G. PKI storage requirements / specs • Due February 2002 • Responsible: ?? • Co-workers: ?? • H. PKI storage service • Due June 2002 • Responsible ?? • Co-Workers ?? • I. Investigation about other Services • Due August 2002 • Responsible: Peter ?? • Co-Workers ??

More Related