1 / 25

Overview and Introduction

Overview and Introduction. March 22-23, 2006 Regional SIG Meetings Houston, Texas. Regional SIG Meeting Roles. All Maximize value delivered from POSC to industry and from industry to POSC POSC and SIG Members Maximize value delivered from POSC to members and from members to POSC

Télécharger la présentation

Overview and Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview and Introduction March 22-23, 2006 Regional SIG MeetingsHouston, Texas

  2. Regional SIG Meeting Roles • All • Maximize value delivered from POSC to industry and from industry to POSC • POSC and SIG Members • Maximize value delivered from POSC to members and from members to POSC • Translation: • Learn what’s cooking and get involved • As a patron, a server, a chef, a supplier, a manager, … • Contribute items you need/want for “tomorrow’s” menu. • As a champion, subject expert, connoisseur, cook, or guest

  3. Overall Standards Process

  4. Success Factors • Collaboration – steer [just] clear of competitiveness • Value – neither theory nor art are sufficient reasons, must enhance real business advantages • Change Agency – standardization requires change • Innovation • Resources • Marketing • Planning • Execution

  5. Modes of Collaboration • Late • Clean-up diversity  ride replacement cycles • Early • Make a good start  ride adoption cycles • Top-Down • Sold from the top  visible, funded efforts • Bottom-Up • Incremental knitting  almost invisible, evolutionary at best

  6. May 9-11 Events • Public Seminar and Vendor Exhibition (May 11, Thursday) • Current reports from actual experiences and plans from oil companies, service companies, and software companies. • SIG Working Meetings • Technical Teams • We address implementation feedback and continuing detailed specification issues • Use Case and Requirements Team • We address possible future areas of focus: drilling reports, completions, environmental, well services, well stimulation, service rig reporting. • Implementation Support Team • People supporting WITSML-enabled environments share lessons learned and current issues and challenges.

  7. May 11: WITSML Public Seminar • Meeting Host: Schlumberger • Exhibitors (from Nov. 2005) • Baker Hughes, Halliburton/Landmark, INT, Knowledge Systems, Paradigm, POSC, SDC Geologix, Sense Intellifield, Smith Bits, Wellstorm Development

  8. May 12: Integrated Production Operations SIG Meeting • Follow-up to March 23 SIG Meeting • More on PRODML Optimization progress • Review of feedback from reviews of Fluid Properties data transfer specifications • Update from the Norway IIP project • …

  9. Meeting Plan • Jan 11. India. Preliminary Geophysics and WITSML Deployment meetings • Mar. 22-23. Houston. SIG Meetings • Apr.- June Geophysical SIG APAC (Mumbai) • May 9-12. Houston. WITSML and IntOps Events [SLB host] • June 13-14, 20-21. Norway and UK. Regional SIG Meetings • Sep. 19-20. Houston. SIG Meetings • Oct. 17-20. Europe. WITSML and IntOps Events [BP host] • Nov. 8. Houston. Annual Member Meeting • Nov. 28-Dec. 1. Europe. Regional SIGs (2 locations)

  10. Standards Activity in 2005 and 2006

  11. Standards Activity in 2005 and 2006

  12. Drilling Portfolio Drilling (WITSML) SIG Facilitation, ’06 10%

  13. WITSML Drilling: Vision • Now • Mainly geosteering support • Mainly straight-through source to operator • Usage • Statoil and Hydro 100%, • 2+ Majors High-end Wells, • 1+ Major Significant use by early ‘07 • +2 or 3 Years • Broader range of business processes • Sufficient maturity for aggregation/QC by service companies • Greater usage by operators • Quantification • Considering profiling WITSML Drilling benefits in terms of project costs and savings for typical drilling projects

  14. E&P Subject Areas: WITSML Coverage Board Economics Reservoir Production Engineering Geology Expl Petrophysics Petroleum Geology Engineering Drilling Production Facilities Engineering Engineering Engineering Drilling Completion & Production Geophysics Operations Workover Operations Can we use this image to portray the growth in WITSML coverage?

  15. E&P Subject Areas: WITSML Coverage • WellPath • Well Wellbore • Trajectory • CRS, Projections • Units of Measure Board General Economics Reservoir Log,WellLog Production Engineering Geology Expl Petrophysics Petroleum Geology Engineering Network Model Volume Report Activity Report Drilling Production Facilities Engineering Engineering Engineering Drilling Completion & Production Geophysics Operations Workover Operations Enhancements for Production beginning with Volume and Activity Reporting, continuing with PRODML towards Optimization.

  16. E&P Subject Areas: WITSML Coverage Board General Economics Reservoir Production Engineering Geology Expl Petrophysics Petroleum Geology Engineering Drilling Production Facilities Engineering Engineering Engineering Drilling Completion & Production Geophysics Operations Workover Operations At a future time, we could consider the viability of data exchange Standards for facility data, reservoir data, economics data, etc. filling out the E&P space.

  17. What’s in a Name? epiXML Family epiXML Board Economics Reservoir Production Engineering Geology ?ML ?ML Expl Petrophysics Petroleum Geology Engineering PRODML Drilling Production Facilities ?ML Engineering Engineering Engineering ?ML WITSML Drilling Completion & Production Geophysics Operations Workover Operations Regardless of the naming pattern, this is one integrated Standards Family with a great deal of reuse and consistency.This anticipates a successful integration of PRODML results.

  18. Production Portfolio Production (Integrated Operations) SIG Facilitation, ’06 8%

  19. Production Portfolio: Vision • Now • Daily Reporting to Partners: • Ready for Public Review, Deployment starting in Norway • PRODML Work Group due to complete end of August • Three basic optimization use cases: specifications and pilot testing • Distributed Temperature Survey Standard published • Field deployments by BP and Shell (Lios, SLB, Weatherford) • +2 or 3 Years • Co-existence with / adaptation for OPC Foundation UA • Integration of Optimization and Reporting • Beginning of Automation of Administration, Scheduling, etc. • Integration with Equipment and Facility reference standards • Quantitative / Qualitative Value • Baseline in ’07.

  20. Geology Portfolio Geology (PWLS) SIG Facilitation, ’06 4.5%

  21. Data Management Portfolio

  22. Data Management Portfolio Data Management (DSS) SIG Facilitation, ’06 1.8%Liaison 0.2%, Outside 1.0%, Help 0.5%

  23. Regulatory Portfolio

  24. Geophysical Portfolio Geophysical SIG Facilitation, ’06 2%

  25. Alan Doniger, POSC Chief Technology OfficerEmail: Doniger@POSC.orgPhone: +1 713 267-5124Fax: +1 713 784-9219http://www.posc.orghttp://www.witsml.orghttp://www.prodml.org

More Related