1 / 11

Catastrophic Backup Action Plan

Catastrophic Backup Action Plan. Recommendations for short-term corrective action involving selected shortfalls (Go after “low hanging fruit”). Shortfall: An OPC is down with a Catastrophic Outage. Consequence: Somebody isn’t getting something they need to do their job.

glynis
Télécharger la présentation

Catastrophic Backup Action Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Catastrophic Backup Action Plan Recommendations for short-term corrective action involving selected shortfalls (Go after “low hanging fruit”)

  2. Shortfall: An OPC is down with a Catastrophic Outage Consequence: Somebody isn’t getting something they need to do their job. Solution(s): Another OPC picks up the slack, even if degraded. Basic and in-depth alternatives (some). Lead Agency: Usually, the newly providing OPC. Risks: Bandwidth; data conversion costs for recipient; other priorities for assigned personnel. Resources: Not extensive. Varies with shortfall. Time Frame: Generally, 6-12 months for each.

  3. Shortfall #1: NWSTG Gateway Down for GTS A/N Data Consequence: No WMO obs to NCEP. No American WMO obs to AFWA, NAVO, FNMOC. Solution(s): Directly feed NCEP from AFWA. Take steps to find other American data sources. Lead Agency: AFWA. Risks: Availability of personnel resources. Resources: 3 M/M (AFWA, FAA, NWSTG) Time Frame: May-Aug 2002.

  4. Shortfall #2: NESDIS Down – Unable to Transmit Imagery Consequence: No imagery to NCEP/WFOs. No digital data or imagery via SPP. Solution(s): Collect imagery via Mark-4B &/or FMQ-17 systems; post on Web and xmit via SPP. Lead Agency: AFWA. Risks: Bandwidth to AFWA/FNMOC; data conversion costs, personnel availability. Resources: 4-8 M/M + NCEP data conversion costs Time Frame: Jun 2002 – Sep 2003.

  5. Shortfall #3: No Standard Access to OPC Web Pages Consequence: No common quick access to OPC Web pages. Solution(s): Standardized access across all OPC Home pages. Lead Agency: FNMOC. Risks: Failure to agree on acceptable standard. Resources: < 1 M/M combined for all OPCs. Time Frame: Jun – Aug 2002.

  6. Shortfall #4: No Ocean Color Backup for NAVOCEANO Consequence: No optical products; impacting minehunting, diver OPS, lidar bathymetry, etc. Solution(s): NOAA send subsets of MODIS sensor data to NAVOCEANO. Lead Agency: NAVOCEANO. Risks: Software access, data conversion costs. Resources: < 1 M/M + data conversion costs. Time Frame: Apr- Aug 2002.

  7. Shortfall #5: NESDIS Down – Unable to Provide SDRs/EDRs Consequence: SDRs/EDRs unavailable to numerical models and variety of other customers. Solution(s): AFWA provide expanded GOES Feature Track Winds and some EDRs from DMSP. Lead Agency: AFWA. Risks: Reduction of current data volume/types. Resources: 3 M/M + data ingest costs. Time Frame: Jun-Dec 2002.

  8. Shortfall #6: FNMOC Outage – NAVOCEANO Needs Backup Winds Consequence: NAVO Ocean Current models won’t execute properly without real time winds. Solution(s): Provide AVN &/or MM5 winds and related fields from NCEP &/or AFWA. Lead Agency: FNMOC. Risks: Availability of required fields; data conver-sion efforts; incompatible regional geometries. Resources: 5 M/M. Time Frame: Apr 2002 – Feb 2003.

  9. Shortfall #7: FNMOC Outage – AFWA Needs Backup SST Anal Consequence: AFWA models won’t execute properly; no SST source at AFWA. Solution(s): NAVO provide SST analyses from MODAS direct to AFWA. Lead Agency: NAVOCEANO. Risks: Data format or geometry incompatibilities. Resources: 1 M/M + data conversion costs. Time Frame: Apr – Aug 2002.

  10. Shortfall #8: AFWA Down - Need Flight Plan S/W NOGAPS Feed Consequence: ACFP and CMARPS revert to Climatology if no global model data. Solution(s): B/Up NOGAPS/AVN data flow from FNMOC/NCEP direct to Scott & Langley AFBs. Lead Agency: FNMOC. Risks: Resources to adopt AFWA bundling scripts. Resources: 3-4 M/M Time Frame: Jun – Nov 2002

  11. Recommendations Continue to pursue solutions as briefed to all eight shortfalls. Adjust Plan as reality and resource availability dictates. Add/delete shortfalls as needed.

More Related