1 / 12

Comparing the Benefits of International Building Sustainability Assessment Methods

Comparing the Benefits of International Building Sustainability Assessment Methods. DGNB since 2007. BREEAM since 1990. Minergie Eco P since 1998. CASBEE since 2001. HQE since 1996. LEED since 1998. HK Beam since 2003. Green Star since 2003. Table of Contents. Background

goro
Télécharger la présentation

Comparing the Benefits of International Building Sustainability Assessment Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparing the Benefits of International BuildingSustainability Assessment Methods DGNB since 2007 BREEAM since 1990 Minergie Eco P since 1998 CASBEE since 2001 HQE since 1996 LEED since 1998 HK Beam since 2003 Green Star since 2003

  2. Table of Contents • Background • Defining the Problem • Objective • Existing Precedents • Methodology

  3. Concept of Sustainability Economy Investment Cost Operating Cost Background | Defining the Problem | Objective | Existing Precedents | Methodology Site Function Resource Comfort Energy Social Ecology Health Impact Transport Design

  4. Sustainability Standards DGNB since 2007 BREEAM since 1990 Minergie P Eco since 1998 LEED since 1998 CASBEE since 2001 HQE since 1996 HK Beam since 2003 Background | Defining the Problem | Objective | Existing Precedents | Methodology Green Star since 2003

  5. Defining the Problem Lack of transparency for developers, owners and tenants regarding expenses and benefits • What certificate can provide which benefits? • Which opportunities and which risks are associated with obtaining a certificate? • Is it just a new name for the same old product? ► Research into the economy of construction and occupancy of certified properties. Background | Defining the Problem | Objective | Existing Precedents | Methodology

  6. Objective Deciding factors for developers, owners and tenants Which certificate requires… • …higher initial expenses? • …more benefits? Background | Defining the Problem | Objective | Existing Precedents | Methodology Benefits Developer/Building Owner • Improve sale/rental price • Subsidies • “Green” Image Occupant/Tenant • Improve comfort and health • Reduce waste of resource • Reduce operating cost Expenses Developer/Building Owner • Audit cost • Investment cost Occupant/Tenant • Sales/rental price Benefit of Certified Properties ≥ Conventional Properties ?

  7. Existing Precedents • Overview of several tools on the German market analyzing their framework, structure and criteria > DGNB most comprehensive • First opinion surveys among developers, owners and tenants > Growing interest • Comparing costs and benefits of certified and conventional buildings (for example US: LEED) > It’s worth investing • Need of Further Research • Find out the needs of developers, owners and tenants in detail • Compare these needs to the Benefit of International Standards as well as with existing German standards and laws Background | Defining the Problem | Objective | Existing Precedents | Methodology

  8. Methodology • Module 1 • Surveys and interviews with: • Developers • Building owners • Tenants • Identify the interests of developers, building owners and tenants • Define economic criteria for Case Study Research Background | Defining the Problem | Objective | Existing Precedents | Methodology

  9. Methodology • Module 2 • Empirical Research of Case Studies of certified versus conventional • properties • Structural measures • Construction Strategy • Occupancy Strategy • Local Market Background | Defining the Problem | Objective | Existing Precedents | Methodology Office Buildings Built after 2000 Certified by LEED, BREEAM and DGNB Economic criteria

  10. Methodology • Module 3 • Analysis of Case Studies • Description • Structural measures • Construction Strategy • Occupancy Strategy • Local Market Background | Defining the Problem | Objective | Existing Precedents | Methodology Input/Output Factor

  11. Methodology • Module 4 • Comparison of Case Studies • Identifying factors for success and/or failure • Drawing conclusions regarding the value of each certificate Background | Defining the Problem | Objective | Existing Precedents | Methodology LEED Convent. DGNB BREAAM Input/Output Factor Input/Output Factor Input/Output Factor Input/Output Factor

  12. Thank you for your time and attention! DGNB BREEAM Minergie Eco P HQE CASBEE LEED HK Beam Green Star

More Related