1 / 4

CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA ACADEMIC SENATE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS COMMITTEE

CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA ACADEMIC SENATE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE ACADEMIC SENATE AP-004-910 Revision to the Guide to Program Assessment And Academic Program Review. Academic Programs Committee Date: 1/13/10 Executive Committee Received

gracielaa
Télécharger la présentation

CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA ACADEMIC SENATE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS COMMITTEE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA ACADEMIC SENATE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE ACADEMIC SENATE AP-004-910 Revision to the Guide to Program Assessment And Academic Program Review

  2. Academic Programs Committee Date: 1/13/10 Executive CommitteeReceived and Forwarded Date: 3/3/10 Academic Senate Date: 3/10/10 First Reading Waiver requested

  3. 1. CLASSIFICATION: AP-004-910 2. TITLE OF REFERRAL: Revision to the Guide to Program Assessment and Academic Program Review 3. BACKGROUND: The Guide to Program Assessment and Academic Program Review was last revised in 2003. Nearly all departments developed assessment plans and WASC has revised expectations for Academic Program Review. The Proposed revisions take these changes into account.

  4. 4.a RESOURCES RECOMMENDED: Claudia Pinter-Lucke; 2003 Guide to Program Assessment and Academic Program Review. 4.b RESOURCES CONSULTED: Claudia Pinter-Lucke; All DeanS and Associate Deans; Steve McCauley. 5. DISCUSSION: There were some minor editorial changes, rearranging of sections, updating of language, especially titles, removal of irrelevant passages. The revised version is more coherent and current. 6. RECOMMENDATION: The Academic Programs Committee recommends approval of the referral AP-004-910 Revision to the Guide to Program Assessment and Academic Program Review.

More Related