1 / 26

Other Hot and Not-so-Easy Issues in Consumer Cases

Other Hot and Not-so-Easy Issues in Consumer Cases. Consumer Bankruptcy in Practice: A Webinar Series Explore current developments with experts in consumer bankruptcy. Chapters 7 and 13 Discharges *Generally*. See sections I.A., B. and C. in materials

grant
Télécharger la présentation

Other Hot and Not-so-Easy Issues in Consumer Cases

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Other Hot and Not-so-Easy Issues in Consumer Cases Consumer Bankruptcy in Practice:A Webinar Series Explore current developments with experts in consumer bankruptcy.

  2. Chapters 7 and 13 Discharges*Generally* • See sections I.A., B. and C. in materials • Chapter 13 discharge is not “super” any more • 523(a)(1) - tax or customs duty • 523(a)(2) - money, property, etc. obtained by fraud, false statements, etc. • 523(a)(3) - unscheduled debt • 523(a)(4) - fiduciary fraud, embezzlement or larceny • 523(a)(5) - domestic support obligation • 523(a)(6) - willful and malicious injury • 523(a)(7) - governmental fine, penalty, etc. • 523(a)(8) - educational loan

  3. Chapters 7 and 13 Discharges*Generally* • See sections I.A., B. and C. in materials • 523(a)(9) – death or personal injury because of intoxicated operation of vehicle • 523(a)(10) – debt from previous case with no discharge • 523(a)(11) – final judgment, etc. by Federal depository institutions regulatory agency • 523(a)(12) – malicious or reckless failure to fulfill commitment to Federal depository institutions regulatory agency • 523(a)(13) – restitution • 523(a)(14) – debt incurred to pay nondischargeable federal tax

  4. Chapters 7 and 13 Discharges*Generally* • See sections I.A., B. and C. in materials • 523(a)(14B) – Federal election fines or penalties • 523(a)(15) – non-DSO debt from divorce or separation • 523(a)(16) – post-petition membership association fee or assessment • 523(a)(17) – filing fee or expense imposed on prisoner • 523(a)(18) – ERISA or TSP loan • 523(a)(19) – securities law violation or fraud

  5. Chapters 7 and 13 Debtor Discharges*Time Limits* • Chapter 7 to Chapter 7 • See section I.D.1. in materials • Eight years • Filing to filing • Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 • See section I.D.2. in materials • Four years • “Filed under” apply to original or converted case? Probably converted

  6. Chapters 7 and 13 Debtor Discharges*Time Limits* • Chapter 13 to Chapter 7 • See section I.D.3. in materials • Six years • Meaning of “payments under the plan” – probably means just that, not payments to unsecured creditors • Chapter 13 to Chapter 13 • See Section I.D.4. in materials • Two years • Filing to filing even though unlikely event • Can still file, but cannot get discharge (same with chapter 7 to 13)

  7. Chapter 13 Discharge Requirements • See section I.F. in materials • 1328(a) – debtor certification that all DSOs due on or before date of certification (including pre-petition, as provided in the plan) have been paid • 1328(g) – debtor education certificate • 1328(h) – finding of no reasonable cause to believe 522(q)(1) is applicable or that there is pending proceeding charging such a felony or liability for such kind of debt

  8. Effect of Audit on Chapter 7 Discharge • See section I.G. in materials • 727(d)(4)(A) – revocation of discharge if debtor has failed to explain satisfactorily a material misstatement in audit • 727(d)(4)(B) – revocation of discharge if debtor has failed to explain satisfactorily his failure to make requested audit documents and information available for inspection • USTP has currently suspended audits due to budgetary constraints • First USTP public report on debtor audits issued in April • http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/reports_studies/docs/Debtor_Audit_Report_FY2007.pdf

  9. Paying Debtor’s Counsel in Chapter 13 • See section II.A. in materials • How much? • See section II.A.2. in materials • Southern District of Texas • $3,085 max (plus filing fee) • $2,700 max if dismissed before or w/i 120 days of confirmation • National range $2,500 - $3,750 • When? • See section II.A.3. in materials • Southern District of Texas • Secured and/or adequate protection payments first? (see In re DeSardi, 340 B.R. 790 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2006))

  10. Paying Creditor’s Counsel in Chapter 13 • See section II.B. in materials • State law allows, and Bankruptcy Code contemplates, payment of attorney’s fees of mortgagee’s counsel • How? • 2016? (see In re Padilla, 379 B.R. 643 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2007)) • Notice? • Invoice to debtor?

  11. Credit Counseling*General* • 109(h)(1) – an individual may not be a debtor unless he receives credit counseling from an approved provider within 180-day period preceding date of filing • Does not apply in involuntary cases • In re Allen, 378 B.R. 151 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2007) • In re Diloreto, 2008 WL 141922 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2008)

  12. Credit Counseling*General* • See section III.A. in materials • UST (bankruptcy administrator) approves counselors • http://www.usdoj.gov.ust/eo/bapcpa/ccde/cc_approved.htm • UST interim final rule – 28 C.F.R. 58.15-17 • UST proposed final rule – comment period ended April 1

  13. Credit Counseling*Curriculum* • See section III.A. in materials • 109(h)(1) - “opportunities available for credit counseling” and assistance in “performing a related budget analysis” • 111(c)(2)(E) – “provide adequate counseling with respect to a client’s credit problems that includes an analysis of such client’s current financial condition, factors that caused such financial condition, and how such client can develop a plan to respond to the problems without incurring negative amortization of debt” • Further guidance from UST final rule?

  14. Credit Counseling*Timing* • 180 Days • See section III.B.1. in materials • Does court have discretion not to dismiss/strike if this issue is raised? Probably not • In re Dyer, 381 B.R. 200 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 2007) • In re Giles, 361 B.R. 212 (Bankr. D. Utah 2007) • But see In re Bricksin, 346 B.R. 497 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2006); In re Enloe, 373 B.R. 123 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2007) • UST and chapter 13 trustee have discretion • Repeat Filers • See section III.B.2. in materials • No distinction in statute or reported decisions • Timely certificate may serve repeat filings but stale certificate could not

  15. Credit Counseling*Timing* • On the Petition Date or One Day Prior • See section III.B.3. in materials • Courts go both ways • On Petition Date • One Day Prior • Again, UST and chapter 13 trustee have discretion

  16. Credit Counseling*Eligibility and the Effect of Ineligibility* • Jurisdictional? • See section III.C.1. in materials • Majority rule is that it is not jurisdictional • Application of stay? • See section III.C.2. of materials • Split • Southern District of Texas – not applicable (see In re Salazar, 339 B.R. 622 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2006))

  17. Credit Counseling*Eligibility and the Effect of Ineligibility* • Strike petition or dismiss case? • See section III.D. of materials • Another split • 362(c)(3): if petition filed within 1 year of dismissal of prior case, stay limited to 30 days • Southern District of Texas – striking petition and annulling stay (see Wyttenback v. C.I.R., 382 B.R. 726 (S.D. Tex. 2008)) • See also In re Hubbard, 333 B.R. 377 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2005) • UST position, however, is for dismissal, and majority appears to be headed to dismissal (see In re Jones, 352 B.R. 813 (S.D. Tex. 2006))

  18. Credit Counseling*109(h)(2) Exemption by UST* • See section III.E.1. of materials • 109(h)(2) – UST determines that the approved agencies in a district are not “reasonably able to provide adequate services to the additional individuals” as a result of this bankruptcy requirement • Four districts in Louisiana and Mississippi had waivers due to Hurricane Katrina, but now only Eastern District of Louisiana still has a waiver

  19. Credit Counseling*109(h)(3) Extension-Exigent Circumstances* • See section III.E.2. of materials • Certification • Written? • Verified? • Majority holds that unsworn statements are insufficient (see In re Hubbard, 333 B.R. 377 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2005)) • By debtor? Counsel? • Debtor must personally verity • Specific facts as to particular debtor • In re Mingueta, 338 B.R. 833 (Bank. C.D. Cal. 2006) (debtor must substantiate and specify circumstances or steps taken to attempt to obtain credit counseling before filing) • In re Rodriguez, 336 B.R. 462 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2005) (facts must distinguish debtor from those generally expected to comply with counseling requirement)

  20. Credit Counseling*109(h)(3) Extension-Exigent Circumstances* • See section III.E.2. of materials • Exigent Circumstances • Foreclosure? Depend if state has nonjudicial foreclosure, like Texas? • In re Henderson, 364 B.R. 906 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2007) (court was persuaded that in Texas, where non-judicial foreclosure sales are permitted on short notice to borrower, foreclosure on family home is itself “exigent circumstance”) • Cf. In re Hedquist, 342 B.R. 295 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2006) (delay until eve of foreclosure, despite ample notice, not “exigent circumstance”) • Debtor must timely seek counseling • In re Wilson, 346 B.R. 59 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 2006) (debtor must request counseling prepetition) • In re Randolph, 342 B.R. 633 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005) (exigent circumstances exception does not extend to debtor who “simply fails to prioritize the counseling requirement”)

  21. Credit Counseling*109(h)(3) Extension-Exigent Circumstances* • See section III.E.2. of materials • Could not obtain during five days of request made • Certification must be satisfactory to court • Proposed new rule would deem certificate satisfactory unless court orders otherwise • Again, UST and chapter 13 trustee have discretion

  22. Credit Counseling*109(h)(4) Permanent Waiver* • See section III.E.3. of materials • Disability – debtor is so physically impaired as to be unable, after reasonable effort, to participate in required briefing • Incapacity – debtor is impaired by reason of mental illness or mental deficiency so as to be incapable of realizing and making rational decisions with respect to financial responsibilities • Active military duty in a military combat zone • Incarcerated debtors disabled or incapacitated? • In re Latovljevic, 343 B.R. 817 (Bank. N.D. W.Va. 2006) (no) • In re Vollmer, 361 B.R. 811 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2007) (yes)

  23. Credit Counseling*109(h)(4) Permanent Waiver* • See section III.E.3. of materials • Dead debtors disabled or incapacitated? • In re Trembulak, 2007 WL 420188 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2007) • Other Disabilities? • In re Jarrell, 364 B.R. 899 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2007) (mental illness) • In re Howard, 359 B.R. 589 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2007) (physical disability) • In re Tulper, 345 B.R. 322 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2006) (physical disability) • Sword or Shield? • In re Mendez, 367 B.R. 109 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2007) (debtor waived strict compliance with 109) • In re Lilliefors, 379 B.R. 608 (Bank. E.D. Va. 2007) (debtor judicially estopped from denying he completed counseling)

  24. Debtor Education • Timing • Bankruptcy Rule 1007(b)(7) • Chapter 7 – 45 days of date “first set” for 341 • Chapter 13 – no later than last plan payment made or 1328(b) motion for discharge • Noncompliance results in closing of case with no discharge • Majority rule is that debtor must pay filing fee to reopen – see section III.G. of materials

  25. Application of 707(b) to Converted Case • See section IV. of materials • Does it apply? • If so, as of what date?

  26. Chapter 13 Plan Modifications • See section V. of materials • What is the standard? Does the means test apply?

More Related