1 / 30

Project Walk Through

Project Walk Through. Professor Hanne Tønnesen MD PHD &  Nermin Ghith, MPH, PHD Student Shu-Ti Chiou MD PHD MSc Oliver Groene MSc PHD. Contents. Design and outcomes Methods Analyses Ethical considerations Project Organization and Economy Authorships and Publication. Design.

gray-boone
Télécharger la présentation

Project Walk Through

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Walk Through Professor Hanne Tønnesen MD PHD &  Nermin Ghith, MPH, PHD Student Shu-Ti Chiou MD PHD MSc Oliver Groene MSc PHD

  2. Contents • Design and outcomes • Methods • Analyses • Ethical considerations • Project Organization and Economy • Authorships and Publication

  3. Design • An RCT with hospital departments allocated to one of the two groups • Undergo the Recognition Process immediately = Intervention group • Continue their usual routine = Control group

  4. Design cont. After one year • The Control group begins the recognition process (= delayed start), • The Intervention group (=immediate-start) continues with the recognition process.

  5. Randomization • computerised • blocks of unknown sizes • stratification for each participating country • performed by independent researcher

  6. Outcomes Frequency of health promotion services regarding • smoking • excessive alcohol use • overweight • mal-nutrition • physical inactivity

  7. Outcomes • Physical, mental, and social health status by Short Form Health Survey (SF36) • patients • staff (McHorney, Colleen A.; Ware, John E.; Raczek, Anastasia E. Med Care 1993; 31: 247-263)

  8. Material • 2 x 44 clinical hospital departments • Minimal relevant difference 30% in delivery of HP services • P-2 basic HP deliveries of 40% • P-1 expected HP deliveries of 70% • N=2x40+10% drop outs = 2x44

  9. Inclusion criteria • All kinds of clinical hospital departments are eligible; from university as well as non-university clinical hospital departments

  10. Exclusion criteria • Palliative care departments, paediatric departments, nursing homes, non-hospital departments, and primary care facilities • WHO-HPH standards and tools are not validated for these clinical activities.

  11. Clin Dept n = 2x44 Intervention Data collect Control TAU R RP RP Intervention Data collect Control Data collect 1y 2y Site Visit & Data Val Control Data collect Site Visit & Data Val Trial Profile

  12. Methods First step: • Inclusion • Agreement • Allocation

  13. Methods – Baseline Package • CD Rom • Project description, Action plan and Time schedule tailored for the participating department • Manual (a written form and a video) and material for collection of data • Case report files (CRF): documents, forms for internal MR Audit, Patient and Staff Surveys • Inspiration material for Quality Plan

  14. Data collection • Copies of Policies, Guidelines, and Programs etc (translated into English) • signed by Head of Dept, H/HS Coordinator and N/R Coordinator - see “Data Form” • Internal Audit of 50 consecutive medical records (from the month prior to inclusion) • see “MR Audit Form” • Survey for patients and staff • see “SF-36 + Additional forms”

  15. Quality plan • Use baseline results • Clear milestones • Action plan and Time line for implementation in the following 12 months • The Hospital/HS Management, the Head of Department as well as the N/R and H/HS Coordinators sign the plan • See “Manual”.

  16. Returning baseline package • All collected data and the Quality Plan are sent to WHO-CC in Copenhagen.

  17. Implementation of Quality Plan • Implement Quality Plan over 12 months according to Milestones, Action plan and Time line • Minor adjustments often necessary according to changes in hospital structure, patient groups, staff etc in order to reach the Milestones

  18. Follow-up Package • Data collection similar to baseline: • Internal MR Audit • Surveys • Revised Quality Plan

  19. Data validation after 1 yr • Only after receiving all materials at WHO-CC in Copenhagen • Visit to confirm the data from internal MR audit and surveys results • Interviews with staff and patients • External audit of 50 randomly selected MR

  20. Trial Profile Clin Dept n = 2x44 Intervention Data collect Control TAU R RP RP Intervention Data collect Control Data collect 1y 2y Site Visit & Data Val Control Data collect Site Visit & Data Val

  21. Certificates

  22. Analyses • ITT by an external researcher • Frequency of health promotion services delivered • Fishers’ Exact Test • Physical, mental, and social health status are scored using the SF-36 • Mann-Whitney Test

  23. Ethical considerations • Scientific Ethical Committee in the Danish Capital Region (International trials) • Danish Data Protection Agency (International trials) • Data Security and Confidentiality • Departments will be anonymised • Only the research team have access • Patients and staff surveys carried out in accordance with hospital guidelines • Patients and staff data are anonymous (without PIN) at collection

  24. Project Organisation • WHO-CC research team and International Supervisors • Responsible for research quality, data analysis and scientific writing • National/Regional and H/HS Coordinators from HPH Networks • Responsible for supporting project • Hospital Managements and Heads of participating departments • Responsible for driving the project, collecting data and implement QP

  25. Project Organisation • Approved by the Copenhagen University as a part of the PHD study for Nermin Ghith • Supervised by • Hanne Tønnesen MD PHD • Shu-Ti Chiou MD PHD MSc • Oliver Groene MSc PHD • Study incorporated in MoU between WHO and HPH

  26. Project Economy • Hospitals & Departments and Networks secure own resources related to participation • Resources, office facilities etc. for the PHD student are covered by • WHO-CC, Bispebjerg University Hospital • Health Science, Faculty of Medicine Lund University

  27. Authorships & Publication • Main results will be included in the PHD of Nermin Ghith, who will draft the main paper(s) under supervision • National/Regional Networks and participating Hospitals/Departments can publish own data together with research team • Authorship follows the Vancouver Criteria

  28. Authorships & Publication • Maximum one active contributor from each N/R Network will be co-author • Other contributors can be acknowledged according to their work

  29. Authorships & Publication • Publication of the research results in International scientific journals • Further dissemination in clinical, scientific and public forums as well as media including WHO and HPH Network websites

  30. Contents • Design and outcomes • Methods • Analyses • Ethical considerations • Project Organization and Economy • Authorships and Publication

More Related