1 / 13

UNDERSTANDING BRAND SCHEMAS THROUGH BRAND CONCEPT MAPS

UNDERSTANDING BRAND SCHEMAS THROUGH BRAND CONCEPT MAPS. BRAND CONCEPT MAPS. Identifies Salient Brand Associations Individual maps are aggregated into consensus maps Method requires little experience or statistical techniques. Procedure for Constructing Brand Concept Maps.

gwidon
Télécharger la présentation

UNDERSTANDING BRAND SCHEMAS THROUGH BRAND CONCEPT MAPS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UNDERSTANDING BRAND SCHEMAS THROUGH BRAND CONCEPT MAPS

  2. BRAND CONCEPT MAPS • Identifies Salient Brand Associations • Individual maps are aggregated into consensus maps • Method requires little experience or statistical techniques

  3. Procedure for Constructing Brand Concept Maps I. Elicitation Stage • Solicit brand associations through open-ended questions about the brand • Select those that at least 50% of respondents mentioned • Write these associations on cards

  4. Procedure for Constructing Brand Concept Maps II. Mapping Stage • Tell respondent to think about brand, look over cards & select relevant ones, add cards if needed • Explain BCM with an example, stressing significance of line types • Have respondent construct BCM for target brand, with target brand in middle

  5. Procedure for Constructing Brand Concept Maps III. Aggregation Stage • Identify core brand associations (50% cutoff) • Identify first-order associations (ratio of first-order mentions/total mentions needs to be greater than 50% & superordinate > subordinate) • Remaining core brands are placed on the map linking them to first-order associations and all other links are made (ave. number of times each link mentioned across maps as cut-off) • For each link place lines (1-3) to signify intensity of connection (average number of lines respondents used to represent that linkage in their individual map)

  6. Implication of Brand Schemas • Assess Positioning; strategy vis-a’-vis positioning • Brand Extensions • Schema-Consistent Inferences • Categorization

  7. Schemas are not stored randomly Schemas are grouped into categories and linked to one another CONTENT vs. STRUCTURE

  8. Implications of Categorization (attributional vs. relational) • Taxonomic vs. Goal Derived • Similarity • Impact of product/category knowledge • Context Dependency • Likelihood of retrieving alternative • Defines Competitors • Substitutes • Measuring market share • Things for breakfast vs. things for breakfast when on the run • Share-of-stomach measure

  9. Implications of Categorization • Brand Evaluation • Expectations • Proximity to prototype • Category incongruency • Piecemeal vs. Schema-driven affect • New Beverage: Zippy • Carbonated • Coffee-flavored • Served cold • With or without milk

  10. New Product Positioning ACHIEVING THE RIGHT “MIX” • Associate brand with appropriate category • Differentiate brand from other category members

  11. Exemplar-Based Positioning Abstract-Based Positioning Soda Market: Coke Cereal Market: Crunchy Doesn’t get soggy in milk Daily amount of fiber Great taste New Product Positioning • ASSOCIATE YOUR BRAND TO WHAT??

More Related