1 / 13

Jeffrey P. Morgenthaler, Walter M. Harris (U. Washington), Michael R. Combi (U. Michigan)

Large Aperture [O I] 6300 Å Observations of Comet Hyakutake: Implications for the Photochemistry of OH and [O I] Production in Comet Hale-Bopp. Jeffrey P. Morgenthaler, Walter M. Harris (U. Washington), Michael R. Combi (U. Michigan). Emission line from a metastable state of oxygen

gwylan
Télécharger la présentation

Jeffrey P. Morgenthaler, Walter M. Harris (U. Washington), Michael R. Combi (U. Michigan)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Large Aperture [O I] 6300 Å Observations of Comet Hyakutake: Implications for the Photochemistry of OH and [O I] Production in Comet Hale-Bopp Jeffrey P. Morgenthaler, Walter M. Harris (U. Washington), Michael R. Combi (U. Michigan)

  2. Emission line from a metastable state of oxygen O(1D) difficult to get to with photon excitation Product of electron excitation or molecular dissociation 110 s lifetime What is [O I] 6300 Å?

  3. Hale-Bopp had “too much” [O I] • By a factor of 3—4 • Assuming standard H2O and OH photochemistry • 4 instruments on 3 telescopes • Morgenthaler et al., Ap.J., 2001 asked: is photochemistry correct? • OH in particular

  4. Likely Answer • Glinski et al. (2004): Hale-Bopp coma dense enough for gas phase chemistry: O + OH → O2 + H • Simple coma model with 14 concentric shells • Complex chemical model with 55 reactions • O2 efficient at producing [O I] • OH → [O I] branching ratio still needed to be raised to match Hale-Bopp data

  5. Do [O I] observations of other comets support any change in OH branching ratios? • Uwe Fink [O I] profiles of many comets consistent with standard H2O and OH photochemistry • Fink et al. do not cleanly separate airglow and NH2 • Sensitivity of long-slit spectrometers to extended sources is low compared to wide-field Fabry-Pérots • OH does dominates [O I] >104 km • Fink sensitivity to [O I] from OH may be too low to address this issue

  6. Fabry-Pérot Observations • Solar minimum comets: • Hale-Bopp (Morgenthaler et al. 2001) • “Too much” [O I] • Halley (Magee-Sauer et al. 1988, 1990), Hyakutake (this work) • Highly variable production rates • Solar max comet: Austin • Good agreement with standard photochemistry (Schultz et al. 1993)

  7. Comet Austin [O I] Profile (Schultz et al. 1993)

  8. Hyakutake (2006 March 23)

  9. Hyakutake (2006 March 23)

  10. Hyakutake (2006 March 23)

  11. Hyakutake (2006 March 23) • Time-varying Haser model based on Combi et al. (2005) Q(H2O) values • Glinski et al. (2004) modified OH → [O I] branching ratio (BR3G) not compatible • Model fits data best with standard photochemistry • Let’s stick with standard H2O and OH photochemistry

  12. Halley measured profiles steeper than model

  13. Halley measured profiles steeper than model • Hyakutake model based on actual Q(H2O) values (Combi et al. 2005) fits well • Halley time-varying model based on Q(C2) values (Schleicher et al. 1990) • CN and NH2 profiles match C2 well (Combi et al. 1993) • Does H2O have a different inner coma or outgassing or behavior than CN, NH2, and C2?

More Related