1 / 24

Cystic lesion of pancreas

Cystic lesion of pancreas. Chan Chi King North District Hospital. The tumor, now the size of a small coconut , was a little above and to the left of the umbilicus, feeling like a tense cyst, & pulsating plainly form motion transmitted from the aorta. The dignosis of pancreatic cyst was made.

gzifa
Télécharger la présentation

Cystic lesion of pancreas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cystic lesion of pancreas Chan Chi King North District Hospital

  2. The tumor, now the size of a small coconut , was a little above and to the left of the umbilicus, feeling like a tense cyst, & pulsating plainly form motion transmitted from the aorta. The dignosis of pancreatic cyst was made.. Ann Surg. 1893 Aug;18(2):227-8

  3. How common? • Prevalence 0.21% to 24.3% • Ikeda M. et al 1994; Kimura W. et al. 1995 • Size and number of pancreatic cysts increase with age Zhang. et al. 2002 • ? 80~90% pseudocyst • ? 10% cystic neoplasm • (1% of primary pancreatic neoplasm)

  4. Cystic lesion of pancreas • A broad spectrum of pathological entities • Distinguish pancreatic pseudocyst/ non-neoplastic cyst from pancreatic cystic neoplasm • Distinguish benign cystic neoplasm from potential malignant cystic neoplasm

  5. Non-neoplastic lesions Pseudocyst Inflammatory pancreatic cyst Simple epithelial cyst VHL Cystic fibrosis Neoplastic lesions Serous cystic neoplasm Mucinous cystic neoplasm Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) Cystic endocrine neoplasm Solid Pseudopapillary neoplasm Ducal adenocarcinoma with cystic degeneration Acinar cell cystadenocarcinoma

  6. Epidemiology Brugge WR. et al.NEJM.2004.

  7. Presentation • Found incidentally during imaging • Jaundice.. Abdominal pain.. weight loss.. Anorexia.. History of pancreatitis History of alcohol abuse History of abdominal injury Spinelli KS et al. Ann Surg.2004 Goh BK et al. Am J Surg.2006 Frenandez-del Castilo C et al. Arch Surg.2003 Allen PJ et al. J Gastrointest Surg.2003 >1/3 of Case Symptomatic cysts are associated with higher risk of malignancy ?Cofounding with increasedsize

  8. Role of CT • Characterization of pancreatic cysts • May facilitate differentiation between histological variants for larger lesions • Remain non-diagnostic for small lesions • Firm diagnosis ~ 25 -40%

  9. Microcystic Cyst with solid component Unilocular Cyst Marcocystic Dushyant V. Sahani et al. RadioGraphics 2005 Massachusetts General Hospital

  10. Microcystic lesion: serous cystic neoplasm

  11. Marcocystic lesion Mucinous cystic neoplasm

  12. Cyst with solid component IPMN

  13. Unilocular cyst

  14. Role of MRI • Better delineate the architecture of cystic lesion • Better delineation of pancreatic duct • Not superior to thin cut CT in making diagnosis

  15. Role of PET scan • Italian group at Padua Sperti C et al. J Gastrointest surg. 2005 • > 90% sensitivity / positive predicting value distinguish malignant from benign • Unable to distinguish pre-malignant from benign

  16. Role of EUS morphologyaccuracy ~ 51% • Determine type and structure of cystic lesion • Facilitate fine needle aspiration • Examination of pancreatic ducts and parenchyma

  17. Fine needle aspiratoncystic fluid analysis • Cytology • Tumor markers • CEA, CA19-9, CA 15-3, CA 72-4 • Amylase • Others

  18. Small cystic lesions ( less than 3cm) • ~50% pre-malignant potential • ~ 13-20% malignancy ( < 3cm) • Resect or not to resect? • Surveillance? How? How Often? EUS/ CT Individualized decision Retrospective study Selection bias Overestimate the risk

  19. End

More Related