1 / 19

ESPN/ERA-EDTA registry

ESPN/ERA-EDTA registry. Status. Karlijn van Stralen Enrico Verrina, Jane Tizard, Kitty Jager. Outline. 1st part – registry – Karlijn van Stralen Aims Database Data from 2006 2nd part – results – Jane Tizard Variation within Europe Possibilities for extended research. Aim.

gzifa
Télécharger la présentation

ESPN/ERA-EDTA registry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESPN/ERA-EDTA registry Status Karlijn van Stralen Enrico Verrina, Jane Tizard, Kitty Jager

  2. Outline • 1st part – registry – Karlijn van Stralen • Aims • Database • Data from 2006 • 2nd part – results – Jane Tizard • Variation within Europe • Possibilities for extended research

  3. Aim To improve the outcome of children with ESRD throughout Europe

  4. ESPN / ERA-EDTA registry • ESRD is a rare disease • Few patients per country • Cooperation needed to study • Subgroup analyses • Rare PRDs • Survival • Study differences between countries • Research • Establish research networks • Generate hypotheses for more specific analyses • Initiate multi-centre studies

  5. ERA-EDTA registry • Collection of data via ERA-EDTA registry • High quality data • However • No detailed information • Few countries collecting paediatric data • No inclusion of separate paediatric registries

  6. ESPN / ERA-EDTA registry • Collaboration of the ESPN with ERA-EDTA registry • Information from • ERA-EDTA countries with paediatric data • Separate paediatric registries • New (paediatric) registries • Strongly endorse collaboration with adult registries

  7. Data collection • Individual patient data • Standardisation of variables through NephroQUEST project • Specification for paediatric population

  8. Data collection - differentiation • Essential • E.g. Patient identifier, Date of Birth, Start of RRT, Treatment type, changes in treatment • Extended A • E.g. GFR, weight, height, type of transplant, comorbidities, blood pressure • Extended B • E.g. First visit nephrologist, medication use, peritonitis

  9. Database • Facilitate datacollection • Access version • Easy for individual patient collection • Less sensitive to errors • Excel version • Easy for merging large datasets • Sensitive to errors

  10. Database - Access

  11. Database – Excel

  12. Where do we stand? • Sent out database format to many countries • Received many datasets • Merged all datasets • Analysed first results

  13. Participating countries Extended data collection Only collection of essential data Essential data via ERA-EDTA Intention for data collection

  14. Data - 2006 • Population covered • 446,609,104 general population • 82,101,803 children aged 0-15 • New patients in 2006 • 451 • Total patients in 2006 • 2386

  15. Incidence of RRT in children <15 years (pmarp) High > 6 pmarp Medium 5.0 – 6.0 pmarp Low < 5 pmarp Range 0 – 15.2 pmarp

  16. Prevalence of RRT in children <15 years (pmarp) High > 30 pmarp Medium 20 – 30 pmarp Low < 20 pmarp Range 5 – 89 pmarp

  17. Causes of differences • Small numbers/random variation • Registry • No pre-emptive transplantation patients • Low coverage – but has been checked • Cause of renal disease • E.g. Finnish type nephropathy • Differences in health care • Catch – up of patients • Differences in health systems

More Related