1 / 43

XENON Dark Matter Project

XENON Dark Matter Project. Karen Chen Boston College Nevis Labs, Columbia REU 2009. Outline. I: Xenon Detector Concepts ER and NR Discrimination II: Previous Work XENON100 III: Current Work XENON100 Upgrade. Xenon Detector Concept. Xe Dual phase TPC

hackette
Télécharger la présentation

XENON Dark Matter Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. XENON Dark Matter Project Karen Chen Boston College Nevis Labs, Columbia REU 2009

  2. Outline • I: Xenon Detector Concepts • ER and NR Discrimination • II: Previous Work • XENON100 • III: Current Work • XENON100 Upgrade

  3. Xenon Detector Concept Xe Dual phase TPC • Evidence of non-baryonic dark matter • WIMPs • Elastic collisions anode cathode

  4. Xenon Detector Concept • Interaction • (S1) Light • e- drift • Proportional scintillation • (S2) Light anode cathode

  5. ER and NR Sources • Nuclear recoils (NR) • Neutrons • Created from cosmic muons • (alpha,n) • WIMPs • Electronic recoils (ER) • Gamma and beta rays • construction materials cathode anode

  6. ER and NR Sources • Maximize WIMP events • Large detector size • Minimize Background • Low radioactivity materials • Shielding • Underground laboratory (LNGS)

  7. XENON Detectors Past, Present, and Future • XENON10 (2005-2007) • Demonstrated dual phase xenon TPC for WIMP search • XENON100 (2006-2009) • 50kg fiducial volume (FV) mass • Simulation and Experimental results • XENON100+ (2009-2012) • 100kg FV • Under current R&D (that’s me!) • Detector Geometry • Background simulations • Based on XENON100 data • XENON1T (2013-2015) • 1 ton FV • Early R&D

  8. XENON100 • Screen materials for radioactivity • 238U, 232Th, 40K, and 60Co • Ge detector • Vary by manufacturer and thickness Measured radiation rates for materials in XENON100 (plus QUPIDS)

  9. XENON100 • How many bananas is that? • PMTs and bases – 4.2 Bq • Stainless steel – 4.1 Bq • PTFE – 0.1 Bq • Total – 8.4 Bq • Banana* ~ 20 Bq, ~2x • Human** ~ 4000 Bq, ~476x **Wikipedia *http://www.radlab.nl/radsafe/archives/9503/msg00074.html

  10. XENON100 • Background rate for different materials MC Simulation by Alex

  11. PMTs and QUPIDs • Primary BG source • Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) • Lowest radioactivity on the market! • Need lower radioactivity PMTs! • Quartz Photon Intensifying Detector (QUPID) • Developed by Hamamatsu Photonics and Prof. Arisaka (UCLA)

  12. PMTs and QUPIDs XENON10 and XENON100 • 98 top PMTs with ~24% QE • 80 bottom PMTs with ~34% QE XENON100+ and XENON1T • Same top array • 19 bottom QUPIDs • $$$ QUPIDs created for XENON100 Upgrade

  13. XENON100 Upgrade Improvements on XENON100 • Reducing Background • Lower radioactivity materials • QUPIDs • More Xe, less material • Cryostat - Domed for stability • Steel thickness from 1.5mm to 0.1mm • Need to test • Exception: • More can be better Shielding Scaling Up Add radius or height?

  14. XENON100 Upgrade • Steel vs Copper Cryostat • Copper • High thermal conductivity • Soft Metal • Low BG • Stainless Steel • Medium thermal conductivity • Sturdy • High BG MC Simulation by Alex

  15. XENON100 Upgrade • Copper • High thermal conductivity • Soft Metal • Low BG • Stainless Steel • Medium thermal conductivity • Sturdy • High BG LXe 170K

  16. Shielding • Separate the xenon • Cooling tower moved for Xenon100 • The trade off: • Less external BG • neutrons, muons • More intrinsic BG • radioactive decay • Cutting Costs: • XENON1T Shield Shielding for Xenon100 Upgrade

  17. XENON100 Upgrade • Detector Geometry • Double the mass • Height or radius? • Radius limited by QUPIDs • Increase the height • height  drift length • Drift Length Concerns • High voltage • Pileup Problem QUPIDs

  18. Pileup Problem • What is pileup? • Events recorded by trigger • Noise or signal? • Record length • Time for electron to drift from one end to the other • S1 and S2 signal in one event • Multiple events -> Uncertainty

  19. Pileup Problem • Event A S1 Signal • Electron A drifts • Event B S1 Signal • Electrons drift • Event B S2 Signal • Event A S2 Signal • Which signal corresponds to which event? Detector

  20. Pileup Problem Estimate likelihood of pileup n =true interaction rate m =recorded count rate τ = dead time (record length) m = ne-nτ* Percent Loss = 1 - e-nτ • But what is the trigger rate? *Radiation Detection and Measurement by Knoll pgs 120-123

  21. XENON100 Upgrade • Ideas into Monte Carlo Simulations • If I use this geometry, what BG can I expect? • Geant4 • Create the detector geometry • XENON100 • Simplified: Bell, Cryostat, PMTs, Teflon panel Simulate the decay chains 238U, 232Th, 40K, 60Co Scale by radioactivity of each material Analyze - Make appropriate cuts Multiple scatters, energy Fiducial volume

  22. XENON100 Upgrade Steel Cryostat (Inner) Bell Steel Cryostat (Inner) PMTs Teflon Teflon Panel QUPIDs TPC/Target Xe Veto

  23. XENON100 Upgrade • Ideas into Monte Carlo Simulations • If I use this geometry, what BG can I expect? • Geant4 • Create the detector geometry • XENON100 • Simplified: Bell, Cryostat, PMTs, Teflon panel • Simulate the decay chains • 238U, 232Th, 40K, 60Co • Scale by radioactivity of each material Analyze - Make appropriate cuts Multiple scatters, energy Fiducial volume

  24. XENON100 Upgrade • Simulation check: • Rates scale with mass XENON100 (Alex) XENON100 Upgrade (Karen)

  25. XENON100 Upgrade • Side note: • Manipulating energy spectrum with thickness K40 U238 Th232 Co60 K40 U238 Th232 Co60

  26. XENON100 Upgrade • Side note: • Material thickness and K-40 spectrum

  27. XENON100 Upgrade • Event Rate and Energy All Materials PMTs Steel Teflon Copper Trigger rate estimate: ~0.05Hz

  28. XENON100 Upgrade • Ideas into Monte Carlo Simulations • If I use this geometry, what BG can I expect? • Geant4 • Create the detector geometry • XENON100 • Simplified: Bell, Cryostat, PMTs, Teflon panel • Simulate the decay chains • 238U, 232Th, 40K, 60Co • Scale by radioactivity of each material • Analyze - Make appropriate cuts • Multiple scatters, energy • Fiducial volume

  29. XENON100 Upgrade • Number of scatters • Detector Resolution • ~3mm • Single scatter events in the target volume • Good efficiency from PMTs • Events in the xenon veto • Low efficiency of veto PMTs • need >50keVee of energy

  30. XENON100 Upgrade • Different energy in veto cuts

  31. XENON100 Upgrade • Different energy in veto cuts • Histogram of events in the best volume cut

  32. XENON100 Upgrade Xenon100 Event distribution (Alex) • Event Distribution • Fiducial Volume Cut • Low background core • Radial vs Height cuts

  33. XENON100 Upgrade • Event Distribution: PMTs

  34. XENON100 Upgrade • Event Distribution: Steel

  35. XENON100 Upgrade • Event Distribution: Teflon

  36. XENON100 Upgrade • Event Distribution: Copper

  37. XENON100 Upgrade • Event Distribution: All

  38. XENON100 Upgrade • Event Distribution Patterns • Top Heavy: Steel and PMTs • Radial: Teflon, Steel (somewhat) Radial cut - - - - - - - - - - - - > Height cut

  39. XENON100 Upgrade • Added Top Xenon Veto Xe Top Veto Xe Veto

  40. XENON100 Upgrade • Current Design and BG rate • Steel contribution is lowered! • Looks promising! • Reached low background rates in proposal • Doubled FV

  41. Summary • XENON100 • BG contribution from different materials • XENON100 upgrade • Steel vs Copper cryostat • Doubling the mass -> height ->drift length • Pileup – not an issue • Ideas for detector geometry • Analyzed MC simulation results • Effect of veto energy cut • Background levels, trigger rate • Re-simulated with top LXe veto -> Steel BG • BG levels within design levels in NSF proposal

  42. Acknowledgements • XENON Group • Rafael • Elena Aprile • Guillame, Bin, Kyungeun (Elizabeth), Luke • Emily • Nevis REU • Mike Shaevitz, John Parsons • All my fellow REU students

  43. Questions? • XENON100 • BG contribution from different materials • XENON100 upgrade • Steel vs Copper cryostat • Doubling the mass -> height ->drift length • Pileup – not an issue • Analyzed MC simulation results • Effect of veto energy cut • Background levels, trigger rate • Re-simulated with top LXe veto • BG levels within design levels in NSF proposal

More Related