1 / 21

We are Family: Administering Collaborative Center Awards

May 7, 2008. We are Family: Administering Collaborative Center Awards. Introduction:. Centers are funded by complex awards Challenging issues unlike other awards Explore these differences Opportunity to share experiences and possible solutions Communication is IMPORTANT

hakan
Télécharger la présentation

We are Family: Administering Collaborative Center Awards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. May 7, 2008 We are Family: Administering Collaborative Center Awards

  2. Introduction: • Centers are funded by complex awards • Challenging issues unlike other awards • Explore these differences • Opportunity to share experiences and possible solutions • Communication is IMPORTANT • START EARLY!!

  3. It starts with the RFP, BAA or PA • Who provides the leadership for the proposal? • Centers are usually interdisciplinary • How many departments will participate from the lead institution? • How many other institutions or entities will participate? • Who coordinates the administrative and budgetary aspects of the proposal? • Communicate with Sponsored Projects Office and other central resources

  4. It starts with the RFP, BAA or PA (cont'd) • Proposals will be different for contracts, grants and cooperative agreements • RFP may require comment on possible contract award language • Can your institution accept certain language that may be contained in the award? • Cost sharing strategy • Is it required? • Who will provide it?

  5. It starts with the RFP, BAA or PA (cont'd) • Contracts may include a require a Small Business Contracting Plan • Use institutional resources to help • Sponsored Projects Office • Small Business Development Center • Cooperative agreement may require HBCU Institutions or MSI as partners • Review required institutional and agency forms for subrecipients

  6. It starts with the RFP, BAA or PA (cont'd) • Make sure your Sponsored Projects Office is aware of your impending proposal by forwarding a copy of the announcement. • Communication is Essential • Read Announcement • Work Together

  7. Award Mechanism • Grants are easier to administer with fewer restrictions • Contracts have more restrictions and require more approvals for changes in the budget • Awards may restrict some of the budget that requires prior approval before its release • Awards with subcontracts will be affected by timeliness of the award

  8. Center Operations • Financial / administrative personnel requirements • Direct / indirect cost categories • Cost sharing • Institutional support • Advisory mechanism • Other unfunded mandates • Internal RFP process

  9. Subawards • Facilitating the award process • Review of updated workscope and budget • Identify start and end dates • Flow down of award terms and conditions • Security clauses • Intellectual Property • Other subaward monitoring

  10. Subawards (cont’d) • Special considerations for foreign partners • Payment method • Cost reimbursement • Fixed price • Banking issues • Progress Reporting • Monitoring invoices

  11. Effort Certification • Lead institution issues: • Personnel cross colleges and departments • Online vs. manual certification process • Partner institutions issues: • Each institution has its own system • Monitor invoices for personnel costs vs. budget plan

  12. Cost Sharing • Identify funding • Affects of cost sharing • Mandatory vs. Voluntary • Documentation required • Don’t forget to certify the cost share

  13. Indirect Cost Recovery • Reduction of indirect cost recovery when funds are issuedoutside the lead institution • Review institutional policies regarding sharing of indirect cost recovery amongcolleges • Access to the indirect cost recovery to support the infrastructure of the center.

  14. Financial Reporting • Determine management reporting needs • Personnel • Project burn rates • Frequency of reporting • PI ability to redirect funds as needed

  15. Other Funding • Program Income • Individual projects vs. center mission activities • Allocating costs • Monitoring personnel effort • Possible restrictions

  16. Compliance • Lead institution responsible for monitoring • Human and animal protocols • Chemical/Bio-Weapons Control • Select agent approval • Small business reporting • Security plan requirements • Intellectual property • Request information prior to issuing subaward(s)

  17. Continued Funding • Annual Reporting • Renewal Process • Site Visit • Competitive vs. Non-competitive • Audits • Documentation • Retention

  18. Close-out • Review close-out requirements • Start early via communication both to internal and external partners • Programmatic and Financial report • Other reports • Invention • Subwards • Equipment

  19. Discussion / Questions • You Are Not Alone!

  20. Contact Information • Faith Mrutu, faith@umn.edu National Center for Food Protection and Defense University of Minnesota • Pat Jondahl, jonda001@umn.edu Sponsored Projects Administration University of Minnesota

More Related