1 / 16

Final Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Academic Misconduct

Final Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Academic Misconduct. Academic Senate Meeting 9/17/02. Committee Membership. Sara Cames (Undergraduate Judiciary Cabinet) Trey Childress (Graduate Student Government) Cheryl Contant (City & Regional Planning, COA) Gus Giebelhaus (HTS, IAC)

hammer
Télécharger la présentation

Final Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Academic Misconduct

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Final Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Academic Misconduct Academic Senate Meeting 9/17/02

  2. Committee Membership • Sara Cames (Undergraduate Judiciary Cabinet) • Trey Childress (Graduate Student Government) • Cheryl Contant (City & Regional Planning, COA) • Gus Giebelhaus (HTS, IAC) • Hal Irvin (Office of Organizational Development) • Gary May (ECE, COE) • Andy Smith (Dean’s Office, COS) • Ray Vito (ex officio, Student Honor Comm. chair) • Karen Boyd (ex officio, Sr. Assoc. Dean of Students)

  3. Review Committee Recommendations • Office or organization responsible • Actions taken or needed • Action items for Senate

  4. Recommendation #1: Establish benchmarks for time for processing cases • Office of the Dean of Students • Workgroup (staff, faculty, students) led by Amy Stalzer (Success Programs) -- ongoing • Review process, establish “reasonable” expectations on time requirements through process. For example, Student can expect a hearing in xx days after refusing to accept the administrative resolution

  5. Recommendation #2: Increase resources/staffing for academic misconduct process • Office of Dean of Students • Resources provided in Spring, 2002 • New staff hired: • Acting Assistant Dean for Integrity (investigator) • Ethics Education Coordinator • Administrative Assistant – in process • Computerized case tracking system – on-line

  6. Recommendation #3: Increase size of pool of faculty/students to hear cases through Student Honor Committee • Office of Provost – interim solution • Alternates identified for faculty and students • Two or three cases per week • Faculty Senate – needs action • Amend Statutes and Bylaws for Committee composition • Coordinate with Rules and Resolutions Committee

  7. Recommendation #3: Increase size of pool of faculty/students to hear cases through Student Honor Committee • Modify SHC membership: • Current 4 faculty  Propose 12 faculty • Current 3 students (2 UG, 1 G)  Propose 9 students (6 UG, 3 G) • Empanel a Student Honor Committee for hearing as a quorum (as currently defined) of 3 faculty (including chair) and 2 students (at least from the same group as accused)

  8. Recommendation #4: Additional training for SHC members • Office of Dean of Students, faculty, students • Began “Education Sessions” on honor code, process, hearings, and sanctions • Materials available via CD and on-line • Currently, education program required for “new” SHC members

  9. Recommendation #5: Schedule hearings in summer, if needed • Faculty, Dean of Students, SHC • Purpose: to ensure a “timely” response • Implemented with limited success in Summer 2002 • Schedule hearings only if student, instructor, and witnesses are available • Ongoing

  10. Recommendation #6: Greater faculty involvement earlier in process • If instructor and student agree, 3-way conversation between instructor, student, and Assistant Dean initially about suspicions • Office of Dean of Students, faculty • Workgroup (faculty, staff, students) to define implementation process and test – ongoing

  11. Recommendation #7: Strong relationship between Provost and Dean of Students offices • Office of Provost, Dean of Students Office • Recommended ongoing reports, updates, alerts • Ongoing and positive

  12. Recommendation #8: Create Committee on Academic Integrity • Faculty Senate • Need to amend Statutes and Bylaws to establish “Committee on Academic Integrity” • Membership: Elected faculty representatives (4), appointed students (2 from SGA), with SHC chair, Dean of Students, Honor Advisor chair as ex officio members

  13. Recommendation #8: Create Committee on Academic Integrity • Tasks: Continue monitoring and evaluation of academic integrity issues and Honor Code implementation process • Develop a proactive, educational strategy campus-wide • Develop “best practices” for faculty • Consider changes in current process • Coordinate with Student Honor Committee – implementation; Dean of Students – process, education; Student Honor Advisors – education

  14. Recommendation #9: Maintain administrative integrity of hearing process • Dean of Students, Honor Committee Chair • Once hearing scheduled, no administrative resolution of a case without the concurrence of SHC Chair • Operating rule – ongoing

  15. Recommendation #10: Require non-credit course on academic integrity as part of sanctions • Dean of Students, faculty • Ethics educator establishing committee (faculty, students, staff) to develop course for 1st time offenders • Available by August, 2003

  16. Action Items • Statutes and Bylaw Committee: • Enhance membership of Student Honor Committee, yet maintain size of hearing quorum • Establish new Committee on Academic Integrity • Ongoing faculty support for bench-marking, expanding size of SHC, developing sanction course, and forming new committee on academic integrity

More Related